1Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB,
2National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
3Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
4Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, Université
Pierre et Marie Curie/CNRS, Paris, France
für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre,
6School of Earth and Environment,
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
7CICERO – Center for International
Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Oslo, Norway
of California, Irvine, CA, USA
9Nicholas School of the Environment,
Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
10Joint Global Change
Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 5825 University
Research Court, Suite 3500, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Received: 01 Jun 2016 – Discussion started: 12 Jul 2016
Abstract. The Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP) is endorsed by the Coupled-Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) and is designed to quantify the climate and air quality impacts of aerosols and chemically reactive gases. These are specifically near-term climate forcers (NTCFs: methane, tropospheric ozone and aerosols, and their precursors), nitrous oxide and ozone-depleting halocarbons. The aim of AerChemMIP is to answer four scientific questions.
Revised: 16 Dec 2016 – Accepted: 04 Jan 2017 – Published: 09 Feb 2017
1. How have anthropogenic emissions contributed to global radiative forcing and affected regional climate over the historical period?
2. How might future policies (on climate, air quality and land use) affect the abundances of NTCFs and their climate impacts?
3.How do uncertainties in historical NTCF emissions affect radiative forcing estimates?
4. How important are climate feedbacks to natural NTCF emissions, atmospheric composition, and radiative effects?
These questions will be addressed through targeted simulations with CMIP6 climate models that include an interactive representation of tropospheric aerosols and atmospheric chemistry. These simulations build on the CMIP6 Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) experiments, the CMIP6 historical simulations, and future projections performed elsewhere in CMIP6, allowing the contributions from aerosols and/or chemistry to be quantified. Specific diagnostics are requested as part of the CMIP6 data request to highlight the chemical composition of the atmosphere, to evaluate the performance of the models, and to understand differences in behaviour between them.
Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585-607, doi:10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017, 2017.