<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/inc/gmd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-959X</issn>
		<eissn>1991-9603</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmd-2-175-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/175/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/175/2009/gmd-2-175-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/175/2009/gmd-2-175-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>175</start_page>
	<end_page>195</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-04</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">ECHMERIT V1.0 – a new global fully coupled mercury-chemistry and transport model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Jung</name>
			<email>g.jung@cs.iia.cnr.it</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>I. M. Hedgecock</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. Pirrone</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">IIA-CNR, Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Italian National Research Council, c/o UNICAL, 87036 Rende, Italy</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Mercury is a global pollutant due to its long lifetime in the atmosphere. Its
hemispheric transport patterns and eventual deposition are therefore of major
concern. For the purpose of global atmospheric mercury chemistry and
transport modelling the ECHMERIT model was developed. ECHMERIT, based on the
global circulation model ECHAM5 differs from most global mercury models in
that the emissions, chemistry (including general tropospheric chemistry and
mercury chemistry), transport and deposition are coupled on-line to the GCM.
The chemistry mechanism includes an online calculation of photolysis rate
constants using the Fast-J photolysis mechanism, the CBM-Z tropospheric
gas-phase mechanism and aqueous-phase chemistry based on the MECCA mechanism.
Additionally, a mercury chemistry mechanism that incorporates gas and aqueous
phase mercury chemistry is included. A detailed description of the model,
including the wet and dry deposition modules, and the implemented emissions
is given in this technical report. First model testing and evaluation show a
satisfactory model performance for surface ozone and mercury mixing ratios
(with a mean bias of 1.46 nmol/mol for ozone and a mean bias of 13.55 fmol/mol for
TGM when compared with EMEP station data). Requirements regarding measurement
data and emission inventories which could considerably improve model skill
are discussed.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> AMAP/UNEP: Technical Background Report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/UNEP Chemicals Branch, 159~pp., online available at: www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/Atmospheric_Emissions/Technical_background_report.pdf, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Ariya, P A., Khalizov, A., and Gidas, A.: Reactions of gaseous mercury with atomic and molecular halogens: kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 7310–7320, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bey, I., Jacob, D J., Yantosca, R M., Logan, J A., Field, B D., Fiore, A M., Li, Q., Liu, H Y., Mickley, L J., and Schultz, M G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology- Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23095, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Brinkop, S. and Sausen, R.: A finite difference approximation for convective transports which maintains positive tracer concentrations, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, 70, 245–248, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Bullock, O R.: Current methods and research strategies for modeling atmospheric mercury, Fuel Processing Technology, 65–66, 459–471, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> CAMx: CAMx, user&apos;s guide, version 4.40, Environ International Corporation, California, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Chang, J C. and Hanna, S R.: Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87, 167–196, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Christensen, J. H., Brandt, J., Frohn, L. M., and Skov, H.: Modelling of Mercury in the Arctic with the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2251–2257, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Clever, H L., Johnson, S A., and Derrick, M E.: The solubility of Mercury and Some Sparingly Soluble Mercury Salts in Water and Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Refer. Data, 14, 631–680, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Damian, V., Sandu, A., Damian, M., Potra, F., and Carmichael, G R.: The kinetic preprocessor KPP: a software environment for solving chemical kinetics, Comput. Chem. Eng., 26, 1567–1579, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Dastoor, A P. and Larocque, Y.: Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a modelling study, Atmos. Environ., 38, 147–161, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H H., Coggins, A M., Spain, T G., Jennings, S G., and Temme, C.: Long-term measurements of atmospheric mercury at Mace Head, Irish west coast, between 1995 and 2001, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5267–5276, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Ebinghaus, R., Banic, C., Beauchamp, S., Jaffe, D., Kock, H H., Pirrone, N., Poissant, L., Sprovieri, F., and Weiss, P S.: Spatial coverage and temporal trends of land-based atmospheric mercury measurements in the northern and southern hemispheres, chapter 9 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications; Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 168–219, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Beirle, S., Spichtinger, N., James, P., Forster, C., Junker, C., Wagner, T., Platt, U., and Jennings, S. G.: The North Atlantic Oscillation controls air pollution transport to the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1769–1778, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Fortuin, J. and Kelder, H.: An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31 709–31 734, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Friedli, H R., Arellano, A F., Cinnirella, S., and Pirrone, N.: Mercury chemical transformation in the gas, aqueous and heterogenous phase: state-of-the-art science and uncertainties, chapter 15 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications; Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 345–376, 2008a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Friedli, H R., Arellano, A F., Cinnirella, S., and Pirrone, N.: Mercury emissions from global biomass burning: spatial and temporal distribution, chapter 8 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications; Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 145–167, 2008b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Ganzeveld, L. and Lelieveld, J.: Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry-general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 20999–21012, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Ganzeveld, L., Lelieveld, J., and Roelofs, G.-J.: A dry deposition parameterization for sulfur oxides in a chemistry and general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 5679–5694, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Ganzeveld, L. N., van Aardenne, J. A., Butler, T. M., Lawrence, M. G., Metzger, S. M., Stier, P., Zimmermann, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: Anthropogenic and natural offline emissions and the online EMissions and dry DEPosition submodel EMDEP of the Modular Earth Submodel system (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 6, 5457–5483, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> G&amp;aring;rdfeldt, K. and Jonsson, M.: Is bimolecular reduction of Hg(II) complexes possible in aqueous systems of environmental importance, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 4478–4482, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Granier, C., Lamarque, J F., Mieville, A., Muller, J F., Olivier, J., Orlando, J., Peters, J., Petron, G., Tyndall, G., and Wallens, S.: POET, a database of surface emissions of ozone precursors, online available at: http://www.aero.jussieu.fr/projet/ACCENT/POET.php, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Grell, G., Knoche, R., Peckham, S., and McKeen, S.: Online versus offline air quality modeling on cloud-resolving scales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16117, doi:10.1029/2004GL020175, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Hagemann, S.: An improved land surface parameter dataset for global and regional climate models, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Hall, B.: The gas phase oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 301–315, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Hall, B. and Bloom, N S.: Report to the Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Hedgecock, I M. and Pirrone, N.: Chasing quicksilver: Modeling the atmospheric lifetime of \chemHg^0(g) in the marine boundary layer at various latitudes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 69–76, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Hedgecock, I M., Trunfio, G A., Pirrone, N., and Sprovieri, F.: Mercury chemistry in the MBL: Mediterranean case and sensitivity studies using the AMCOTS (Atmospheric Mercury Chemistry over the Sea) model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 7217–7230, \doi10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.002, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Hedgecock, I M., Pirrone, N., Trunfio, G A., and Sprovieri, F.: Integrated mercury cycling, transport, and air-water exchange (MECAWEx) model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20302, \doi10.1029/2006JD007117, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Horowitz, L W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D L., Emmons, L K., Rasch, P J., Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J F., Schultz, M G., Tyndall, G S., et~al.: A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D24), 4784, \doi10.1029/2002JD002853, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Hynes, A J., Donohoue, D L., Goodsite, M E., and Hedgecock, I M.: Our current understanding of major chemical and physical processes affecting mercury dynamics in the atmosphere and at the air-water/terrestrial interfaces, chapter 14 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 322–344, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Jacobson, M Z.: Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Jaeglé, L., Strode, S A., Selin, N E., and Jacob, D J.: The GEOS-chem model, chapter 18 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications; Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 401–410, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Kerkweg, A., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4617–4632, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.: What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Liang, Q., Jaeglé, L., Jaffe, D A., Weiss-Penzias, P., Heckman, A., and Snow, J A.: Long-range transport of Asian pollution to the northeast Pacific: Seasonal variations and transport pathways of carbon monoxide, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S07, doi:10.1029/2003JD004402, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Lin, C.-J. and Pehkonen, S O.: Aqueous free radical chemistry of mercury in the presence of iron oxides and ambient aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4125–4137, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Lin, C.-J. and Pehkonen, S O.: Aqueous Phase Reactions of Mercury with Free Radicals and Chlorine: Implications for Atmospheric Mercury Chemistry, Chemosphere, 38, 1253–1263, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Lin, S J. and Rood, R B.: Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Transport Schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Lindberg, S., Dong, W., and Meyers, T.: Transpiration of gaseous elemental mercury through vegetation in a subtropical wetland in Florida, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5207–5219, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Lindberg, S., Bullock, R., Ebinghaus, R., Engstrom, D., Feng, X., Fitzgerald, W., Pirrone, N., Prestbo, E., and Seigneur, C.: A synthesis of progress and uncertainties in attributing the sources of mercury in deposition, AMBIO, 36, 19–33, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Lohman, K., Seigneur, C., Gustin, M., and Lindeberg, S.: Sensitivity of the global atmospheric cycle of mercury to emissions, Appl. Geochem., 23, 454–466, \doi10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.022, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Lott, F. and Miller, M.: The Representation of Sub-Grid Scale Orography in GCMs, NATO ASI SERIES I Global Environmental Change, 50, 275–290, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Lubick, N.: Ocean mercury on the increase, Nature, 459, 620–620, doi:10.1038/459620b, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Mason, R P.: Mercury emissions from natural sources and their importance in the global mercury cycle, chapter 7 in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications; Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 130–144, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Mueller, J.-F. and Brasseur, G.: IMAGES: a three-dimensional chemical transport model of the global troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 16445–16490, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Munthe, J.: The aqueous oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone, Atmos. Environ., 26A, 1461–1468, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> New, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P.: Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 1: development of a 1961-90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology, J. Climate, 12, 829–856, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> New, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P.: Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 2: development of 1901-96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate, J. Climate, 13, 2217–2238, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Nordeng, T E.: Extended Versions of the Convective Parametrization Scheme at ECMWF and Their Impact on the Mean and Transient Activity of the Model in the Tropics, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Pacyna, E G., Pacyna, J M., Steenhuisen, F., and Wilson, S.: Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4048–4063, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Pacyna, J M., Pacyna, E G., and Aas, W.: Changes of emissions and atmospheric deposition of mercury, lead, and cadmium, Atmos. Environ. International, 43, 117–127, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Pai, P., Karamchandani, P., and Seigneur, C.: Simulation of the regional atmospheric transport and fate of mercury using a comprehensive Eulerian model, Atmos. Environ., 31, 2717–2732, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Pal, B. and Ariya, P A.: Studies of ozone initiated reactions of gaseous mercury: kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 572–579, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Pehkonen, S O. and Lin, C.-J.: Aqueous photochemistry of mercury with organic acids, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. (1995), 48, 144–150, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Peters, J. A. H W. and Olivier, J. G J.: EDGAR3/POET Enussuibs; 1997 emissions and scenarios for 1995-2020; Technical background infromation on global and regional sectoral emissions, RIVM, Bilthoven, report no. 773301003, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Pirrone, N. and Mason, R.: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications Interim Report of the UNEP Global Partnership on Atmospheric Mercury Transport and Fate Research, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Pirrone, N. and Mason, R. (Eds.): Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models, Springer, USA, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Pirrone, N., Keeler, G J., and Nriagu, J O.: Regional differences in worldwide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 17, 2981–2987, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="60" content_type="text"> Pleijel, K. and Munthe, J.: Modelling the Atmospheric Mercury Cycle - Chemistry in Fog Droplets, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1441–1457, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="61" content_type="text"> Pongprueksa, P., Lin, C J., Lindberg, S E., Jang, C., Braverman, T., Russell~Bullock, O., Ho, T C., and Chu, H W.: Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models III: Boundary and initial conditions, model grid resolution, and Hg (II) reduction mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1828–1845, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="62" content_type="text"> Roeckner, E., Baeuml, G., Bonventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., and Tompkins, A.: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. PART I: Model description, Report 349, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="63" content_type="text"> Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="64" content_type="text"> Sander, R.: Modeling Atmosheric Chemistry: Interactions between Gas-Phase Species and Liquid Cloud/Aerosol Particles, Survey Geophys., 20, 1–31, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="65" content_type="text"> Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 445–450, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="66" content_type="text"> Sandu, A. and Sander, R.: Technical note: Simulating chemical systems in Fortran90 and Matlab with the Kinetic PreProcessor KPP-2.1, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 187–195, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="67" content_type="text"> Schroeder, W H., Anlauf, K.-G., Barrie, L A., Lu, J Y., Steffen, A., Schneeberger, D R., and Berg, T.: Arctic springtime depletion of mercury, Nature, 394, 331–332, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="68" content_type="text"> Schulzweida, U., Kornblueh, L., and Quast, R.: CDO User&apos;s Guide, Climate Data Operators, Version 1.0.7, Tech. rep., online available at: www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/software/cdo/, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="69" content_type="text"> Schwartz, S E.: Mass-transport considerations pertinent to aqueous phase reactions of gases in liquid-water clouds, pp. 415–471, in: W. Jaeschle, Editor, Chemistry of Multiphase Atmospheric Systems NATO ASI Series G6, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="70" content_type="text"> Seigneur, C., Lohman, K., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Shia, R.-L.: Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D21), 27795–27809, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="71" content_type="text"> Seigneur, C., Karamchandani, P., Vijayaraghavan, K., Lohman, K., Shia, R L., and Levin, L.: On the effect of spatial resolution on atmospheric mercury modeling, Sci. Total Environ., 304, 73–81, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="72" content_type="text"> Seigneur, C., Vijayaraghavan, K., Lohmann, K., Karamchandani, P., and Scott, C.: Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 555–569, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="73" content_type="text"> Seigneur, C., Vijayaraghavan, K., and Lohman, K.: Atmospheric mercury chemistry: sensitivity of global model simulations to chemical reactions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmospheres, 111, D22306, doi:10.1029/2005JD006780, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="74" content_type="text"> Seinfeld, C P. and Pandis, S N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="75" content_type="text"> Selin, N E., Jacob, D J., Park, R J., Yantosca, R M., Strode, S., Jaeglé, L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02308, \doi10.1029/2006JD007450, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="76" content_type="text"> Sellers, P J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y C., and Dalcher, A.: A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 505–531, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="77" content_type="text"> Slemr, F. and Scheel, H E.: Trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations at the summit of the Wank mountain, Southern Germany, Atmos. Environ., 32, 845–853, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="78" content_type="text"> Slemr, F., Brunke, E G., Ebinghaus, R., Temme, C., Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Schroeder, W., Steffen, A., and Berg, T.: Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1977, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(10), 1516, \doi10.1029/2003GL016954, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="79" content_type="text"> Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Hermann, M., Kock, H. H., Martinsson, B. G., Schuck, T., Sprung, D., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Gaseous mercury distribution in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere observed onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1957–1969, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="80" content_type="text"> Slinn, S A. and Slinn, W. G N.: Prediction for particle deposition of natural waters, Atmos. Environ., 14, 1013–1016, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="81" content_type="text"> Sommar, J., Hallquist, M., Ljungström, E., and Lindqvist, O.: On the gas phase reactions between volatile biogenic mercury species and the nitrate radical, J. Atmos. Chem., 27, 233–247, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="82" content_type="text"> Sommar, J., G&amp;aring;rdfeldt, K., Strömberg, D., and Feng, X.: A kinetic study of the gas-phase reaction between the hydroxyl radical and atomic mercury, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3049–3054, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="83" content_type="text"> Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Hedgecock, I M., Landis, M S., and Stevens, R K.: Intensive atmospheric mercury measurements at Terra Nova Bay in Antarctica during November and December 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D23), 4722, \doi10.1029/2002JD002057, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="84" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Eckhardt, S., Forster, C., James, P., and Spichtinger, N.: On the pathways and timescales of intercontinental air pollution transport, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D23), 4684, \doi10.1029/2001JD001396, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="85" content_type="text"> Streets, D., Zhang, Q., and Wu, Y.: Projections of Global Mercury Emissions in 2050, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2983–2988, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="86" content_type="text"> Swartzendruber, P C., Jaffe, D A., M.Prestbo, E., Weiss-Penzias, P., Selin, N E., Park, R., Jacob, D J., Strode, S., and Jaeglé, L.: Observations of reactive gaseous mercury in the free troposphere at the Mount Bachelor Observatory, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24301, doi:10.1029/2006JD007415, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="87" content_type="text"> Taylor, K E., Williamson, D., and Zwiers, F.: AMIPII Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Concentration Boundary Conditions, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="88" content_type="text"> Thompson, A., Witte, J., McPeters, R., Oltmans, S., Schmidlin, F., Logan, J., M.Fujiwara, Kirchhoff, V., Posny, F., Coetzee, G., Hoegger, B., Kawakami, S., Ogawa, T., Johnson, B., Vömel, H., and Labow, G.: Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology 1. Comparison with Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and ground-based measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 108, D28238, \doi10.1029/2001JD000967, 2003.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="89" content_type="text"> Tiedtke, M.: A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="90" content_type="text"> Tokos, J. J S., Hall, B., Calhoun, J A., and Prestbo, E M.: Homogeneous gas-phase reaction of \chemHg^0 with \chemH_2O_2, \chemO_3, \chemCH_3I, and \chem(CH_3)_2S: Implications for atmospheric Hg cycling, Atmos. Environ.(1994), 32, 823–827, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="91" content_type="text"> Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Influence of different convection parameterisations in a GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5475–5493, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="92" content_type="text"> Travnikov, O.: Contribution of the intercontinental atmospheric transport to mercury pollution in the Northern Hemisphere, Atmos. Environ., 39, 7541–7548, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="93" content_type="text"> Van~Loon, L L., Mader, E A., and Scott, S L.: Sulfite Stabilization and Reduction of the Aqueous Mercuric Ion: Kinetic Determination of Sequential Formation Constants, J. Phys. Chem. A., 105, 3190–3195, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="94" content_type="text"> Vermette, S., Lindberg, S., and Bloom, N.: Field tests for a regional mercury deposition network—sampling design and preliminary test results, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1247–1251, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="95" content_type="text"> Vijayaraghavan, K., Karamchandani, P., Seigneur, C., Balmori, R., and Chen, S Y.: Plume-in-grid modeling of atmospheric mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D24305, \doi10.1029/2008JD010580, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="96" content_type="text"> Wang, Z. and Pehkonen, S O.: Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous bromine: atmospheric implications, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3675–3688, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="97" content_type="text"> Wesely, M L.: Parameterization of the surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="98" content_type="text"> Wesely, M L. and Hicks, B B.: Some factors that affect the deposition rates of sulfur dioxide and similar gases on vegetation, Journal of Air Pollution Control Assessment, 27, 1110–1116, 1977. </reference>
		<reference numeration="99" content_type="text"> Wesely, M L. and Hicks, B B.: A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2261–2282, 2000.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="100" content_type="text"> Wild, O., Zhu, X., and Prather, M J.: Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In-and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models, J. Atmos. Chem., 37, 245–282, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="101" content_type="text"> Yang, X., Cox, R., Warwick, N., Pyle, J., Carver, G., O&apos;Connor, F., and Savage, N.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D23311, \doi10.1029/2005JD006244, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="102" content_type="text"> Zaveri, R A. and Peters, L K.: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 30387–30415, 1999. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

