<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/inc/gmd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-959X</issn>
		<eissn>1991-9603</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmd-2-267-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/267/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/267/2009/gmd-2-267-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/267/2009/gmd-2-267-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>267</start_page>
	<end_page>280</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-12-15</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Quantifying atmospheric transport, chemistry, and mixing using a new  trajectory-box model and a global atmospheric-chemistry GCM</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Riede</name>
			<email>hella.riede@mpic.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Jöckel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Sander</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Air Chemistry Department, P.O. Box  3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present a novel method for the quantification of transport, chemistry, and
mixing along atmospheric trajectories based on a consistent model hierarchy.
The hierarchy consists of the new atmospheric-chemistry trajectory-box model
CAABA/MJT and the three-dimensional (3-D) global ECHAM/MESSy
atmospheric-chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model. CAABA/MJT employs the
atmospheric box model CAABA in a configuration using the
atmospheric-chemistry submodel MECCA (M), the photochemistry submodel JVAL
(J), and the new trajectory submodel TRAJECT (T), to simulate chemistry along
atmospheric trajectories, which are provided offline. With the same
chemistry submodels coupled to the 3-D EMAC model and consistent
initial conditions and physical parameters, a unique consistency between the
two models is achieved. Since only mixing processes within the 3-D 
model are excluded from the model consistency, comparisons of results from
the two models allow to separate and quantify contributions of transport,
chemistry, and mixing along the trajectory pathways. Consistency of transport
between the trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT and the 3-D EMAC model is
achieved via calculation of kinematic trajectories based on 3-D wind
fields from EMAC using the trajectory model LAGRANTO. The combination of the
trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT and the trajectory model LAGRANTO can be
considered as a Lagrangian chemistry-transport model (CTM) moving isolated
air parcels. The procedure for obtaining the necessary statistical basis for
the quantification method is described as well as the comprehensive
diagnostics with respect to chemistry.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The quantification method presented here allows to investigate the
characteristics of transport, chemistry, and mixing in a grid-based
3-D model. The analysis of chemical processes within the
trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT is easily extendable to include, for
example, the impact of different transport pathways or of mixing
processes onto chemistry. Under certain prerequisites described here, the
results can be used to complement observations with detailed information
about the history of observed air masses.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Arteta, J. and Cautenet, S.: Study of ozone distribution over the south-eastern France (ESCOMPTE campaign): discrimination between ozone tendencies due to chemistry and to transport, J. Atmos. Chem., 58, 111–130, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Barbosa, P. M., Stroppiana, D., and Grégoir, J.-M.: An assessment of vegetation fire in Africa (1981–1991): Burned areas, burned biomass, and atmospheric emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 933–950, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Jang, J. C., Jeffries, H. E., and Tonnesen, S.: Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution – II Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 29, 3101–3114. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Tost, H.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System,Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Kentarchos, A. S., Roelofs, G. J., and Lelieveld, J.: Altitude distribution of tropospheric ozone over the Northern Hemisphere during 1996, simulated with a chemistry-general circulation model at two different horizontal resolutions, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17453–17469, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: Simulation of detailed aerosol chemistry on the global scale using MECCA-AERO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2973–2985, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Knudsen, B M., Pommereau, J.-P., Garnier, A., Nunez-Pinharanda, M., Denis, L., Letrenne, G., Durand, M., and Rosen, J M.: Comparison of stratospheric air parcel trajectories based on diffe-rent meteorological analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3415–3424, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Landgraf, J. and Crutzen, P J.: An efficient method for online calculations of photolysis and heating rates, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 863–878, \doi10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Lehmann, R.: An algorithm for the determination of all significant pathways in chemical reaction systems, J. Atmos. Chem., 47, 45–78, 2004. \bibitem[Manonom(2000)] Manonom2000 Manonom, R., Xiaoen, L., and Wongwises, P.: A new Lagrangian-Eulerian coupling model system, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 17, 587–600, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> McBride, J L. and Ebert, E E.: Verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts from operational numerical weather prediction models over Australia, Weather Forecast., 15, 103–121, \doi10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> McKenna, D S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, \doi10.1029/2000JD000114, 2002.  \bibitem[Parrish et~al.(2007)] Parrish2007 Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Forster, C., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., and de Gouw, J. A.: Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, 34, \doi10.1029/2006JD007583, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, \doi10.1175/JCLI3824.1, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 445-450, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Sander, R., Gromov, S., Harder, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Kubistin, D., Riede, H., Taraborrelli, D., and Xie, Z.-Q.: The atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-3.0, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Sandu, A. and Sander, R.: Technical note: Simulating chemical systems in Fortran90 and Matlab with the Kinetic PreProcessor KPP-2.1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 187–195, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Scheele, M P., Siegmund, P C., and Velthoven, P. F J.: Sensitivity of trajectories to data resolution and its dependence on the starting point: in or outside a tropopause fold, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 267–273, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Sinnhuber, B.-M., Müller, R., J., L., Bovensmann, H., Eyring, V., Klein, U., Trentmann, J., Burrows, J P., and Künzi, K F.: Interpretation of mid-stratospheric Arctic ozone measurements using a photochemical box-model, J. Atmos. Chem., 34, 281–290, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Grewe, V., and Garny, H.: Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5489–5504, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Stohl, A.: Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories – a review and bibliography, Atmos. Environ., 32, 947–966, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Wotawa, G., Seibert, P., and Kromp-Kolb, H.: Interpolation errors in wind fields as a function of spatial and temporal resolution and their impact on different types of kinematic trajectories, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 2149–2165, \doi10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Haimberger, L., Scheele, M P., and Wernli, H.: An intercomparison of results from three trajectory models, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 127–135, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Wernli, H. and Davies, H C.: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: The method and some applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 467–489, \doi10.1256/smsqj.53810, 1997. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

