<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/inc/gmd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-959X</issn>
		<eissn>1991-9603</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmd-3-105-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/105/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/105/2010/gmd-3-105-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/105/2010/gmd-3-105-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>105</start_page>
	<end_page>122</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-02-10</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The efficient global primitive equation climate model SPEEDO V2.0</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. A. Severijns</name>
			<email>c.severijns@knmi.nl</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>W. Hazeleger</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), de Bilt, The Netherlands</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The efficient primitive-equation coupled atmosphere-ocean model SPEEDO V2.0
is presented. The model includes an interactive sea-ice and land component.
SPEEDO is a global earth system model of intermediate complexity. It has a
horizontal resolution of T30 (triangular truncation at wave number 30) and 8
vertical layers in the atmosphere, and a horizontal resolution of 2 degrees
and 20 levels in the ocean. The parameterisations in SPEEDO are developed in
such a way that it is a fast model suitable for large ensembles or long runs
(of &lt;i&gt;O&lt;/i&gt;(10&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;) years) on a typical current workstation. The model has no flux
correction. We compare the mean state and inter-annual variability of the
model with observational fields of the atmosphere and ocean. In particular
the atmospheric circulation, the mid-latitude patterns of variability and
teleconnections from the tropics are well simulated. To show the capabilities
of the model, we performed a long control run and an ensemble experiment with
enhanced greenhouse gases. The long control run shows that the model is
stable. CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; doubling and future climate change scenario experiments show a
climate sensitivity of 1.84 K W&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, which is within the range
of state-of-the-art climate models. The spatial response patterns are
comparable to state-of-the-art, higher resolution models. However, for very
high greenhouse gas concentrations the parameterisations are not valid. We
conclude that the model is suitable for past, current and future climate
simulations and for exploring wide parameter ranges and mechanisms of
variability. However, as with any model, users should be careful when using
the model beyond the range of physical realism of the parameterisations and
model setup.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bracco, A., Kucharski, F., Molteni, F., Hazeleger, W., and Severijns, C.: Internal and forced modes of variability in the Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12707, doi:10.1029/2005GL023154, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Breugem, W P., Hazeleger, W., and Haarsma, R J.: Mechanisms of northern tropical Atlantic variability and response to \chemCO_2 doubling, J. Climate, 20, 11, 2691–2705, 2007. %</reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Brix, H. and Gerdes, R.: % North Atlantic Deep Water and Antarctic Bottom Water: Their % interaction and influence on the variability of the global ocean % circulation, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3022-3038, % doi:10.1029/2002JC001335, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Brovkin, V., Bendtsen, J., Claussen, M., Ganopolski, A., Kubatzki, C., Petoukhov, V., Andreev, A.: Carbon cycle, vegetation and climate dynamics in the Holocene: Experiments with the CLIMBER-2 model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1139–1151, doi: 10.1029/2001GB001662, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Claussen, M., Mysak, L. A., Weaver, A. J., et al.: Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models, Clim. Dynam., 18, 579–586, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Cosimo, J.: Bootstrap sea ice concentrations from NIMBUS-7 SMMR and SSM/I, January 1978 to December 2007, Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center, digital media, 1999, updated 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Cunningham, S A., Kanzow, T., Rayner, D., Baringer, M O., Johns, W E., Marotzke, J., Longworth, H R., Grant, E M., Hirschi, J J.-M., Beal, L M., Meinen, C S., and Bryden, H L.: Temporal variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26N, Science, 317, 935–938, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Dai, A., Wigley, T M L., Boville, B A., Kiehl, J T., and Buja, L E.: Climates of the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries Simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model, J. Climate, 14, 485–519, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Danabasoglu, G. and McWilliams, J C.: Sensitivity of the global ocean circulation to parameterizations of mesoscale tracer transports, J. Climate, 8, 2967–2987, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Farneti, R. and Vallis, G. K.: An Intermediate Complexity Climate Model (ICCMp1) based on the GFDL flexible modelling system, Geosci. Model Dev., 2, 73–88, 2009. %</reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Fichefet, T. and % Gaspar, P.: A model study of upper ocean-sea ice interactions, J. % Phys. Oceanogr., 18, 181-195, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Gent, P R. and Williams, J C.: Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 150–155, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Goose, H. and Fichefet, T.: Importance of ice-ocean interactions for the global ocean circulation: a model study, J. Geophys. Res., 104(C10), 23337–23355, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Hazeleger, W., Severijns, C., Seager, R., and Molteni, F.: Tropical Pacific-driven decadal energy transport variability, J. Climate, 18, 2037–2051, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Hazeleger, W. and Haarsma, R J.: Sensitivity of tropical Atlantic climate to mixing in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model, Clim. Dynam., 25, 4, 387–99, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Hazeleger, W., Severijns, C., Haarsma, R., Selten, F., and Sterl, A.: SPEEDO: model description and validation of a flexible coupled model for climate studies, Technical report 257, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, 38~pp., 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Hurrell, J W.: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation and relationships to regional temperature and precipitation, Science, 269, 676–679, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Johns, T C., Durman, C F., Banks, H T., Roberts, M J., McLaren, A J., Ridley, J K., Senior, C A., Williams, K D., Jones, A., Rickard, G J., Cusack, S., Ingram, W J., Crucifix, M., Sexton, D M H., Joshi, M M., Dong, B.-W., Spencer, H., Hill, R S R., Gregory, J M., Keen, A B., Pardaens, A K., Lowe, J A., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stark, S., and Searl, Y.: The New Hadley Centre Climate Model (HadGEM1): Evaluation of Coupled Simulations, J. Climate, 19, 1327–1352, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Joos, F., Prentice, I C., Sitch, S., Meyer, R., Hooss, G., Plattner, G.-K., Gerber, S., and Hasselmann, K.: Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 891–907, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistleret, R., et al.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–470, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Kiehl, J T. and Trenberth, K E.: Earths annual global mean energy budget, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78~pp., 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Knight, J R., Allan, R. J., Folland, C. K., et al.: A signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20708, doi:10.1029/2005GL024233, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Kucharski, F., Molteni, F., and Bracco, A.: Decadal interactions between the western tropical Pacific and the North Atlantic Oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 26, 79–91, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Marotzke, J.: Influence of convective adjustment on the stability of the thermohaline circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 903–907, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Marsh, R., Hazeleger, W., Yool, A., and Rohling, E.: Stability of the thermohaline circulation under millennial \chemCO_2 forcing and two alternative controls on Atlantic salinity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L03605, doi:10.1029/2006GL027815, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> McPhaden, M J., Busalacchi, A J., Cheney, R., Donguy, J.-R., Gage, K S., Halpern, D., Ji, M., Julian, P., Meyers, G., Mitchum, G T., Niiler, P P., Picaut, J., Reynolds, R W., Smith, N., and Takeuchi, K.: The Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere observing system: A decade of progress, J. Geophys. Res., 103(14), 14169–14240, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Meehl, G. A., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, J F B., Stouffer, R J. and Taylor, K E.: The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A new era in climate change research, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1383–1394, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Mellor, G L. and Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 16, 1829–1846, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Molteni, F.: Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parameterizations. I: Model climatology and variability in multi-decadal experiments, Clim. Dynam., 20, 175–191, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Montenegro, A., Brovkin, V., Eby, M., Archer, D., and Weaver, A J.: Long term fate of anthropogenic carbon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19707, doi:10.1029/2007GL030905, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., et al.: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 599~pp., 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Opsteegh, J D., Haarsma, R J., Selten, F M., and Kattenberg, A.: ECBILT: A dynamic alternative to mixed boundary conditions in ocean models, Tellus~A, 50, 348–367, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Orsi, A H., Johnson, G C., and Bullister, J L.: Circulation, mixing and production of Antarctic bottom water, Prog. Oceanogr., 43, 55–109, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Reynolds, R W., Rayner, N A., Smith, T M., Stokes, D C., and Wang, W.: An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for Climate, J. Climate, 15, 1609–1625, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Roche, D. M., Dokken, T. M., Goosse, H., Renssen, H., and Weber, S. L.: Climate of the Last Glacial Maximum: sensitivity studies and model-data comparison with the LOVECLIM coupled model, Clim. Past, 3, 205–224, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Rossow, W B. and Schiffer, R A.: ISCCP Cloud Data Products, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 71, 2–20, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Schmidt, G A., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J E., Aleinov, I., Bell, N., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Friend, A D., Hall, T M., Hu, Y,. Kelley, M., Kiang, N Y., Koch, D., Lacis, A A., Lerner, J., Lo, K K., Miller, R L., Nazarenko, L., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, J., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Russell, G L., Sato, M., Shindell, D T., Stone, P H., Sun, S., Tausnev, N.,Thresher, D., and Yao, M.-S.: Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data, J. Climate, 19, 153–192, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Severijns, C A. and Hazeleger, W.: Optimizing parameters in an atmospheric general circulation model, J. Climate, 18(17), 3527–3535, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Smith, R. S., Gregory, J. M., and Osprey, A.: A description of the FAMOUS (version XDBUA) climate model and control run, Geosci. Model Dev., 1, 53–68, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Stephens, C., Antonov, J I., Boyer, T P., Conkright, M E., Locarnini, R A., O&apos;Brien, T D., and Garcia, H E.: World Ocean Atlas 2001, Volume 1: Temperature, in: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 49, edited by: Levitus, S., US Government Printing Office, Wash., DC, 167~pp., 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Sutton, R T. and Hodson, D L R.: Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate, Science, 309, 115–118, doi:10.1126/science.1109496, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Tiedke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Trenberth, K E. and Caron, J M.: Estimates of meridional atmosphere and ocean heat transports, J. Climate, 14, 3433–3443, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Trenberth, K E., Fasullo, J T., and Kiehl, J T.: Earth&apos;s Global Energy Budget, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 311–324, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> van Oldenborgh, G. J., Philip, S. Y., and Collins, M: El Niño in a changing climate: a multi-model study, Ocean Sci., 1, 81–95, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Wallace, J. M. and Gutzler, D S.: Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere Winter, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 784–812, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Weaver, A J., Eby, M., Wiebe, E C., Bitz, C M., Duffy, P B., Ewen, T L., Fanning, A F., Holland, M M., MacFadyen, A., Matthews, H D., Meissner, K J., Saenko, O., Schmittner, A., Wang, H., and Yoshimori, M.: The UVic Earth System Climate Model: Model description, climatology and application to past, present and future climates, Atmos. Ocean, 39, 361–428, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Xie, P. and Arkin, P A.: Analysis of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions, J. Climate, 9, 840–858, 1996.  </reference>
	</references>
</article>

