<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/inc/gmd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-959X</issn>
		<eissn>1991-9603</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmd-3-293-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/293/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/293/2010/gmd-3-293-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/3/293/2010/gmd-3-293-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>293</start_page>
	<end_page>307</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-04-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Modeling the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates from moraines</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>P. J. Applegate</name>
			<email>patrick.applegate@natgeo.su.se</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. M. Urban</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>B. J. C. Laabs</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Keller</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. B. Alley</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16801, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Geological Sciences, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, New York, 14454, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">now at: Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Geomorphic process modeling allows us to evaluate different methods for
estimating moraine ages from cosmogenic exposure dates, and may provide a
means to identify the processes responsible for the excess scatter among
exposure dates on individual moraines. Cosmogenic exposure dating is an
elegant method for estimating the ages of moraines, but individual exposure
dates are sometimes biased by geomorphic processes. Because exposure dates
may be either &quot;too young&quot; or &quot;too old,&quot; there are a variety of methods
for estimating the ages of moraines from exposure dates. In this paper, we
present Monte Carlo-based models of moraine degradation and inheritance of
cosmogenic nuclides, and we use the models to examine the effectiveness of
these methods. The models estimate the statistical distributions of exposure
dates that we would expect to obtain from single moraines, given reasonable
geomorphic assumptions. The model of moraine degradation is based on prior
examples, but the inheritance model is novel. The statistical distributions
of exposure dates from the moraine degradation model are skewed toward young
values; in contrast, the statistical distributions of exposure dates from
the inheritance model are skewed toward old values. Sensitivity analysis
shows that this difference is robust for reasonable parameter choices. Thus,
the skewness can help indicate whether a particular data set has problems
with inheritance or moraine degradation. Given representative distributions
from these two models, we can determine which methods of estimating moraine
ages are most successful in recovering the correct age for test cases where
this value is known. The mean is a poor estimator of moraine age for data
sets drawn from skewed parent distributions, and excluding outliers before
calculating the mean does not improve this mismatch. The extreme estimators
(youngest date and oldest date) perform well under specific circumstances,
but fail in other cases. We suggest a simple estimator that uses the
skewnesses of individual data sets to determine whether the youngest date,
mean, or oldest date will provide the best estimate of moraine age. Although
this method is perhaps the most globally robust of the estimators we tested,
it sometimes fails spectacularly. The failure of simple methods to provide
accurate estimates of moraine age points toward a need for more
sophisticated statistical treatments.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Anderson, R. S. and Humphrey, N. F.: Interaction of weathering and transport processes in the evolution of arid landscapes, in: Quantitative dynamic stratigraphy, Prentice-Hall, 349–361, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Applegate, P. J., Lowell, T. V., and Alley, R. B.: Comment on &quot;Absence of cooling in New Zealand during the Younger Dryas chronozone&quot;, Science, 320, 746d, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Applegate, P. J.: Estimating the ages of glacial landforms from the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates, PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, United States, available online at http://etda.libraries.psu.edu/, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Balco, G., Stone, J. O., Lifton, N. A., and Dunai, T. J.: A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements, Quat. Geochronol., 3, 174–195, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Benn, D. I. and Evans, D. J. A.: Glaciers and glaciation, Hodder Arnold, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Benson, L., Madole, R., Landis, G., and Gosse, J.: New data for late Pleistocene Pinedale alpine glaciation from southwestern Colorado, Quat. Sci. Rev., 24, 49–65, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Bevington, P. R. and Robinson, D. K.: Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 336, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Bierman, P. R., Reuter, J. M., Pavich, M., et al.: Using cosmogenic nuclides to contrast rates of erosion and sediment yield in a semi-arid, arroyo-dominated landscape, Rio Puerco Basin, New Mexico, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 935–953, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Briner, J. P., Kaufman, D. S., Manley, W. F., Finkel, R. C., and Caffee, M. W.: Cosmogenic exposure dating of late Pleistocene moraine stabilization in Alaska, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 117, 1108–1120, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Brown, E. T., Molnar, P., and Bourlés, D. L.: Comment on &quot;Slip-rate measurements on the Karakorum Fault may imply secular variations in fault motion&quot;, Science, 309, 1326b, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., and Tukey, J. W.: Graphical methods for data analysis: Wadsworth, 395, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Chevalier, M.-L., Ryerson, F. J., Tapponier, P., et al.: Slip-rate measurements on the Karakorum Fault may imply secular variations in fault motion, Science, 307, 411–414, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Croarkin, C. and Tobias, P. (Eds.): NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, accessed 18 September 2009, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Dyurgerov, M. B. and Meier, M. F.: Twentieth century climate change: evidence from small glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1406–1411, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Dreimanis, A.: Tills: their genetic terminology and classification, in: Genetic classification of glacigenic deposits, Balkema, 17–84, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Dunne, J., Elmore, D., and Muzikar, P.: Scaling factors for the rates of production of cosmogenic nuclides for geometric shielding and attenuation at depth on sloped surfaces, Geomorphology, 27, 3–11, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Fletcher, C. A. J.: Computational techniques for fluid dynamics, volume 1 (2nd ed.), Springer, 401, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Gibbons, A. B., Megeath, J. D., and Pierce, K. L.: Probability of moraine survival in a succession of glacial advances, Geology, 12, 327–330, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C., Klein, J., Evenson, E. B., Lawn, B., and Middleton, R.: Beryllium-10 dating of the duration and retreat of the last Pinedale glacial sequence, Science, 268, 1329–1333, 1995a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C., Evenson, E. B., Klein, J., Lawn, B., and Middleton, R.: Precise cosmogenic 10Be measurements in western North America: support for a global Younger Dryas cooling event, Geology, 23, 877–880, 1995b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C. and Phillips, F. M.: Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application, Quat. Sci. Rev., 20, 1475–1560, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Granger, D. E. and Muzikar, P. F.: Dating sediment burial with in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides: theory, techniques, and limitations, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 188, 269–281, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Granger, D. E., Fabel, D., and Palmer, A. N.: Pliocene-Pleistocene incision of the Green River, Kentucky, determined from radioactive decay of cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be in Mammoth Cave sediments, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 113, 825–836, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Hallet, B. and Putkonen, J.: Surface dating of dynamic landforms: young boulders on aging moraines, Science, 265, 937–940, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Hanks, T.: The age of scarplike landforms from diffusion-equation analysis, in: Quaternary geochronology: methods and applications, American Geophysical Union Reference Shelf, 4, American Geophysical Union, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Heisinger, B., Lal, D., Jull, A. J. T., et al.: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons 1. Fast muons, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 200, 345–355, 2002a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Heisinger, B., Lal, D., Jull, A. J. T., et al.: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons 2. Capture of negative muons, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 200, 357–369, 2002b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Hilborn, R. and Mangel, M.: The ecological detective: confronting models with data, Monographs in Population Biology, 28, 315, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Ivy-Ochs, S., Kerschner, H., and Schlüchter, C.: Cosmogenic nuclides and the dating of Lateglacial and early Holocene glacier variations: the Alpine perspective, Quatern. Int., 164–165, p. 53–63, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Jansen, E., Overpeck, J., Briffa, K. R., et al.: Paleoclimate, in: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 433–498, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Kaplan, M. R., Douglass, D. C., Singer, B. S., Ackert, R. P., and Caffee, M. W.: Cosmogenic nuclide chronology of pre-last glacial maximum moraines at Lago Buenos Aires, 46&amp;deg; S, Argentina, Quaternary Res., 63, 301–315, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Kelly, M. A., Lowell, T. V., Hall, B. L., et al.: A 10Be chronology of lateglacial and Holocene mountain glaciation in the Scoresby Sund region, east Greenland: implications for seasonality during lateglacial time, Quat. Sci. Rev., 27, 2273–2282, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Krüger, J.: Moraine ridges formed from subglacial frozen-on sediment slabs and their differentiation from push moraines, Boreas, 25, 57–63, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Laabs, B. J. C., Refsnider, K. A., Munroe, J. S., et al.: Latest Pleistocene glacial chronology of the Uinta Mountains: support for moisture-driven asynchrony of the last deglaciation, Quat. Sci. Rev., 28, 1171–1187, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Lal, D.: Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: in situ nuclide production rates and erosion models, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 104, 424–439, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Lal, D. and Chen, J.: Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces II: special cases of exposure histories of boulders, soils, and beach terraces, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 236, 797–813, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Licciardi, J. M., Clark, P. U., Brook, E. J., Elmore, D., and Sharma, P.: Variable responses of western U. S. glaciers during the last deglaciation, Geology, 32, 81–84, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Masarik, J. and Wieler, R.: Production rates of cosmogenic nuclides in boulders, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 216, 201–208, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Murphy, E. A.: One cause? Many causes? The argument from the bimodal distribution, J. Chron. Dis., 17, 301–324, 1964. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Muzikar, P.: General models for episodic surface denudation and its measurement by cosmogenic nuclides, Quaternary Geochronol., 4, 50–55, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Nash, D. B.: Morphologic dating and modeling degradation of fault scarps, in: Active Tectonics, National Academy Press, 266, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Oerlemans, J.: Extracting a climate signal from 169 glacier records, Science, 308, 675–677, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> O&apos;Neal, M. A.: The effects of slope degradation on lichenometric dating of Little Ice Age moraines, Quaternary Geochronol., 1, 121–128, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Pelletier, J. D., DeLong, S. B., al-Suwaidi, A. H., et al.: Evolution of the Bonneville shoreline scarp in west-central Utah: comparison of scarp-analysis methods and implications for the diffusion model of hillslope evolution, Geomorphology, 74, 257–270, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Pelletier, J. D.: Quantitative modeling of earth surface processes, Cambridge University Press, 304, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P.: Numerical recipes in Fortran 77 (2nd ed.), Cambridge, 927, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Putkonen, J. and Swanson, T.: Accuracy of cosmogenic ages for moraines, Quaternary Res., 59, 255–261, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Putkonen, J., Connolly, J., and Orloff, T.: Landscape evolution degrades the geologic signature of past glaciations, Geomorphology, 97, 208–217, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Richmond, G. M.: Geologic map of the Fremont Lake South quadrangle, Sublette County, Wyoming, 1:50 000, U. S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1138, 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., Sklar, L. S., and Dietrich, W. E.: Hillslope evolution by nonlinear creep and landsliding: an experimental study, Geology, 29, 143–146, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Schaefer, J. M., Oberholzer, P., Zhao, Z., et al.: Cosmogenic beryllium-10 and neon-21 dating of late Pleistocene glaciations in Nyalam, monsoonal Himalayas, Quat. Sci. Rev., 27, 295–311, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Seong, Y. B., Owen, L. A., Caffee, M. W., et al.: Rates of basin-wide rockwall retreat in the K2 region of the central Karakoram defined by terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide 10Be, Geomorphology, 107, 254–262, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Shackleton, N. J.: The 100,000-year ice-age cycle identified and found to lag temperature, carbon dioxide, and orbital eccentricity, Science, 289, 1899–1902, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Wolkowinsky, A. J. and Granger, D. E.: Early Pleistocene incision of the San Juan River, Utah, dated with 26Al and 10Be, Geology, 32, 749–752, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Zimmerman, S. G., Evenson, E. B., Gosse, J. C., and Erskine, C. P.: Extensive boulder erosion resulting from a range fire on the type-Pinedale moraines, Fremont Lake, Wyoming, Quaternary Res., 42, 255–264, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Zreda, M. G., Phillips, F. M., and Elmore, D.: Cosmogenic 36Cl accumulation in unstable landforms 2. Simulations and measurements on eroding moraines, Water Resour. Res., 30, 3127–3136, 1994. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

