Articles | Volume 3, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-415-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-415-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications
T. Heus
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstraße 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
C. C. van Heerwaarden
Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. J. J. Jonker
Department of Multi-Scale Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
A. Pier Siebesma
Department of Multi-Scale Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
S. Axelsen
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The~Netherlands
K. van den Dries
Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
O. Geoffroy
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
A. F. Moene
Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
D. Pino
Applied Physics Department, Technical University of Catalonia, and Institute for Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC), Barcelona, Spain
S. R. de Roode
Department of Multi-Scale Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
J. Vilà-Guerau de Arellano
Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Related subject area
Atmospheric sciences
Accelerating models for multiphase chemical kinetics through machine learning with polynomial chaos expansion and neural networks
A machine learning emulator for Lagrangian particle dispersion model footprints: a case study using NAME
Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach
ISAT v2.0: an integrated tool for nested-domain configurations and model-ready emission inventories for WRF-AQM
Estimation of CH4 emission based on an advanced 4D-LETKF assimilation system
Accelerated estimation of sea-spray-mediated heat flux using Gaussian quadrature: case studies with a coupled CFSv2.0-WW3 system
AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation
A method for generating a quasi-linear convective system suitable for observing system simulation experiments
The second Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land configuration, RAL2
A dynamic ammonia emission model and the online coupling with WRF–Chem (WRF–SoilN–Chem v1.0): development and regional evaluation in China
SCIATRAN software package (V4.6): update and further development of aerosol, clouds, surface reflectance databases and models
Deep learning models for generation of precipitation maps based on numerical weather prediction
An inconsistency in aviation emissions between CMIP5 and CMIP6 and the implications for short-lived species and their radiative forcing
On the use of Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) spectrally resolved radiances to test the EC-Earth climate model (v3.3.3) in clear-sky conditions
Incorporation of aerosol into the COSPv2 satellite lidar simulator for climate model evaluation
The impact of altering emission data precision on compression efficiency and accuracy of simulations of the community multiscale air quality model
AerSett v1.0: a simple and straightforward model for the settling speed of big spherical atmospheric aerosols
Optimization of weather forecasting for cloud cover over the European domain using the meteorological component of the Ensemble for Stochastic Integration of Atmospheric Simulations version 1.0
Bayesian transdimensional inverse reconstruction of the Fukushima Daiichi caesium 137 release
Implementation of HONO into the chemistry–climate model CHASER (V4.0): roles in tropospheric chemistry
Isoprene and monoterpene simulations using the chemistry–climate model EMAC (v2.55) with interactive vegetation from LPJ-GUESS (v4.0)
A modern-day Mars climate in the Met Office Unified Model: dry simulations
The AirGAM 2022r1 air quality trend and prediction model
Evaluation of a cloudy cold-air pool in the Columbia River basin in different versions of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model
Comparing Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 column observations with the CAMS regional air quality ensemble
Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO2 measurements over Antwerp, Belgium
Adapting a deep convolutional RNN model with imbalanced regression loss for improved spatio-temporal forecasting of extreme wind speed events in the short to medium range
Technical descriptions of the experimental dynamical downscaling simulations over North America by the CAM5.4-MPAS4.0 variable-resolution model
ICLASS 1.1, a variational Inverse modelling framework for the Chemistry Land-surface Atmosphere Soil Slab model: description, validation, and application
Towards an improved representation of carbonaceous aerosols over the Indian monsoon region in a regional climate model: RegCM
The E3SM Diagnostics Package (E3SM Diags v2.7): a Python-based diagnostics package for Earth system model evaluation
A method for transporting cloud-resolving model variance in a multiscale modeling framework
The Mission Support System (MSS v7.0.4) and its use in planning for the SouthTRAC aircraft campaign
GENerator of reduced Organic Aerosol mechanism (GENOA v1.0): an automatic generation tool of semi-explicit mechanisms
Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework
Evaluation of high-resolution predictions of fine particulate matter and its composition in an urban area using PMCAMx-v2.0
A local data assimilation method (Local DA v1.0) and its application in a simulated typhoon case
Improved advection, resolution, performance, and community access in the new generation (version 13) of the high-performance GEOS-Chem global atmospheric chemistry model (GCHP)
Source Attribution of Ozone and Precursors in the Northeast U.S. Using Multiple Photochemical Model Based Approaches (CMAQ v5.3.2 and CAMx v7.10)
Lightning assimilation in the WRF model (Version 4.1.1): technique updates and assessment of the applications from regional to hemispheric scales
Optimization of snow-related parameters in the Noah land surface model (v3.4.1) using a micro-genetic algorithm (v1.7a)
Development of an LSTM broadcasting deep-learning framework for regional air pollution forecast improvement
Forecasting tropical cyclone tracks in the Northwest Pacific based on a deep-learning model
A local particle filter and its Gaussian mixture extension implemented with minor modifications to the LETKF
A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
Importance of different parameterization changes for the updated dust cycle modeling in the Community Atmosphere Model (version 6.1)
CLGAN: A GAN-based video prediction model for precipitation nowcasting
Data fusion uncertainty-enabled methods to map street-scale hourly NO2 in Barcelona city: a case study with CALIOPE-Urban v1.0
PyFLEXTRKR: a Flexible Feature Tracking Python Software for Convective Cloud Analysis
Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign
Thomas Berkemeier, Matteo Krüger, Aryeh Feinberg, Marcel Müller, Ulrich Pöschl, and Ulrich K. Krieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2037–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Kinetic multi-layer models (KMs) successfully describe heterogeneous and multiphase atmospheric chemistry. In applications requiring repeated execution, however, these models can be too expensive. We trained machine learning surrogate models on output of the model KM-SUB and achieved high correlations. The surrogate models run orders of magnitude faster, which suggests potential applicability in global optimization tasks and as sub-modules in large-scale atmospheric models.
Elena Fillola, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Alistair Manning, Simon O'Doherty, and Matt Rigby
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1997–2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Lagrangian particle dispersion models are used extensively for the estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes using atmospheric observations. However, these models do not scale well as data volumes increase. Here, we develop a proof-of-concept machine learning emulator that can produce outputs similar to those of the dispersion model, but 50 000 times faster, using only meteorological inputs. This works demonstrates the potential of machine learning to accelerate GHG estimations across the globe.
Maria J. Chinita, Mikael Witte, Marcin J. Kurowski, Joao Teixeira, Kay Suselj, Georgios Matheou, and Peter Bogenschutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Low clouds are one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate prediction. In this paper, we introduce the first version of the unified turbulence and shallow convection parameterization named SHOC+MF developed to improve the representation of shallow cumulus clouds in the Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM). Here, we also show promising preliminary results in a single-column model framework for two benchmark cases of shallow cumulus convection.
Kun Wang, Chao Gao, Kai Wu, Kaiyun Liu, Haofan Wang, Mo Dan, Xiaohui Ji, and Qingqing Tong
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1961–1973, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study establishes an easy-to-use and integrated framework for a model-ready emission inventory for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)–Air Quality Numerical Model (AQM). A free tool called the ISAT (Inventory Spatial Allocation Tool) was developed based on this framework. ISAT helps users complete the workflow from the WRF nested-domain configuration to a model-ready emission inventory for AQM with a regional emission inventory and a shapefile for the target region.
Jagat S. H. Bisht, Prabir K. Patra, Masayuki Takigawa, Takashi Sekiya, Yugo Kanaya, Naoko Saitoh, and Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1823–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we estimated CH4 fluxes using an advanced 4D-LETKF method. The system was tested and optimized using observation system simulation experiments (OSSEs), where a known surface emission distribution is retrieved from synthetic observations. The availability of satellite measurements has increased, and there are still many missions focused on greenhouse gas observations that have not yet launched. The technique being referred to has the potential to improve estimates of CH4 fluxes.
Ruizi Shi and Fanghua Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1839–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the Gaussian quadrature method, a fast algorithm of sea-spray-mediated heat flux is developed. Compared with the widely used single-radius algorithm, the new fast algorithm shows a better agreement with the full spectrum integral of spray flux. The new fast algorithm is evaluated in a coupled modeling system, and the simulations of sea surface temperature, wind speed and wave height are improved. Thereby, the new fast algorithm has great potential to be used in coupled modeling systems.
Forwood Wiser, Bryan K. Place, Siddhartha Sen, Havala O. T. Pye, Benjamin Yang, Daniel M. Westervelt, Daven K. Henze, Arlene M. Fiore, and V. Faye McNeill
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1801–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a reduced model of atmospheric isoprene oxidation, AMORE-Isoprene 1.0. It was created using a new Automated Model Reduction (AMORE) method designed to simplify complex chemical mechanisms with minimal manual adjustments to the output. AMORE-Isoprene 1.0 has improved accuracy and similar size to other reduced isoprene mechanisms. When included in the CRACMM mechanism, it improved the accuracy of EPA’s CMAQ model predictions for the northeastern USA compared to observations.
Jonathan D. Labriola, Jeremy A. Gibbs, and Louis J. Wicker
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1779–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) are simulated case studies used to understand how different assimilated weather observations impact forecast skill. This study introduces the methods used to create an OSSE for a tornadic quasi-linear convective system event. These steps provide an opportunity to simulate a realistic high-impact weather event and can be used to encourage a more diverse set of OSSEs.
Mike Bush, Ian Boutle, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Charmaine Franklin, Kirsty Hanley, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Huw Lewis, Adrian Lock, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Belinda Roux, Stuart Webster, and Mark Weeks
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1713–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Building on the baseline of RAL1, the RAL2 science configuration is used for regional modelling around the UM partnership and in operations at the Met Office. RAL2 has been tested in different parts of the world including Australia, India and the UK. RAL2 increases medium and low cloud amounts in the mid-latitudes compared to RAL1, leading to improved cloud forecasts and a reduced diurnal cycle of screen temperature. There is also a reduction in the frequency of heavier precipitation rates.
Chuanhua Ren, Xin Huang, Tengyu Liu, Yu Song, Zhang Wen, Xuejun Liu, Aijun Ding, and Tong Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1641–1659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1641-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1641-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia in the atmosphere has wide impacts on the ecological environment and air quality, and its emission from soil volatilization is highly sensitive to meteorology, making it challenging to be well captured in models. We developed a dynamic emission model capable of calculating ammonia emission interactively with meteorological and soil conditions. Such a coupling of soil emission with meteorology provides a better understanding of ammonia emission and its contribution to atmospheric aerosol.
Linlu Mei, Vladimir Rozanov, Alexei Rozanov, and John P. Burrows
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1511–1536, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1511-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1511-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper summarizes recent developments of aerosol, cloud and surface reflectance databases and models in the framework of the software package SCIATRAN. These updates and developments extend the capabilities of the radiative transfer modeling, especially by accounting for different kinds of vertical inhomogeneties. Vertically inhomogeneous clouds and different aerosol types can be easily accounted for within SCIATRAN (V4.6). The widely used surface models and databases are now available.
Adrian Rojas-Campos, Michael Langguth, Martin Wittenbrink, and Gordon Pipa
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1467–1480, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1467-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1467-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper presents an alternative approach for generating high-resolution precipitation maps based on the nonlinear combination of the complete set of variables of the numerical weather predictions. This process combines the super-resolution task with the bias correction in a single step, generating high-resolution corrected precipitation maps with a lead time of 3 h. We used using deep learning algorithms to combine the input information and increase the accuracy of the precipitation maps.
Robin N. Thor, Mariano Mertens, Sigrun Matthes, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Sabine Brinkop, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, and Steven Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1459–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We report on an inconsistency in the latitudinal distribution of aviation emissions between two versions of a data product which is widely used by researchers. From the available documentation, we do not expect such an inconsistency. We run a chemistry–climate model to compute the effect of the inconsistency in emissions on atmospheric chemistry and radiation and find that the radiative forcing associated with aviation ozone is 7.6 % higher when using the less recent version of the data.
Stefano Della Fera, Federico Fabiano, Piera Raspollini, Marco Ridolfi, Ugo Cortesi, Flavio Barbara, and Jost von Hardenberg
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1379–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1379-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1379-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The long-term comparison between observed and simulated outgoing longwave radiances represents a strict test to evaluate climate model performance. In this work, 9 years of synthetic spectrally resolved radiances, simulated online on the basis of the atmospheric fields predicted by the EC-Earth global climate model (v3.3.3) in clear-sky conditions, are compared to IASI spectral radiance climatology in order to detect model biases in temperature and humidity at different atmospheric levels.
Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Quaas, David M. Winker, Artem Feofilov, and Nick Schutgens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1359–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol has a large impact on climate. Using a lidar aerosol simulator ensures consistent comparisons between modeled and observed aerosol. We present a lidar aerosol simulator that applies a cloud masking and an aerosol detection threshold. We estimate the lidar signals that would be observed at 532 nm by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization overflying the atmosphere predicted by a climate model. Our comparison at the seasonal timescale shows a discrepancy in the Southern Ocean.
Michael S. Walters and David C. Wong
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1179–1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1179-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A typical numerical simulation that associates with a large amount of input and output data, applying popular compression software, gzip or bzip2, on data is one good way to mitigate data storage burden. This article proposes a simple technique to alter input, output, or input and output by keeping a specific number of significant digits in data and demonstrates an enhancement in compression efficiency on the altered data but maintains similar statistical performance of the numerical simulation.
Sylvain Mailler, Laurent Menut, Arineh Cholakian, and Romain Pennel
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1119–1127, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1119-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1119-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Large or even
giantparticles of mineral dust exist in the atmosphere but, so far, solving an non-linear equation was needed to calculate the speed at which they fall in the atmosphere. The model we present, AerSett v1.0 (AERosol SETTling version 1.0), provides a new and simple way of calculating their free-fall velocity in the atmosphere, which will be useful to anyone trying to understand and represent adequately the transport of giant dust particles by the wind.
Yen-Sen Lu, Garrett H. Good, and Hendrik Elbern
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1083–1104, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Weather Forecasting and Research (WRF) model consists of many parameters and options that can be adapted to different conditions. This expansive sensitivity study uses a large-scale simulation system to determine the most suitable options for predicting cloud cover in Europe for deterministic and probabilistic weather predictions for day-ahead forecasting simulations.
Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, Marc Bocquet, Olivier Saunier, and Yelva Roustan
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1039–1052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
When radionuclides are released into the atmosphere, the assessment of the consequences depends on the evaluation of the magnitude and temporal evolution of the release, which can be highly variable as in the case of Fukushima Daiichi.
Here, we propose Bayesian inverse modelling methods and the reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo technique, which allows one to evaluate the temporal variability of the release and to integrate different types of information in the source reconstruction.
Phuc Thi Minh Ha, Yugo Kanaya, Fumikazu Taketani, Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, Benjamin Schreiner, Klaus Pfeilsticker, and Kengo Sudo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 927–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
HONO affects tropospheric oxidizing capacity; thus, it is implemented into the chemistry–climate model CHASER. The model substantially underpredicts daytime HONO, while nitrate photolysis on surfaces can supplement the daytime HONO budget. Current HONO chemistry predicts reductions of 20.4 % for global tropospheric NOx, 40–67 % for OH, and 30–45 % for O3 in the summer North Pacific. In contrast, OH and O3 winter levels in China are greatly enhanced.
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 885–906, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-885-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-885-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are released by vegetation and have a major impact on atmospheric chemistry and aerosol formation. Non-interacting vegetation constrains the majority of numerical models used to estimate global BVOC emissions, and thus, the effects of changing vegetation on emissions are not addressed. In this work, we replace the offline vegetation with dynamic vegetation states by linking a chemistry–climate model with a global dynamic vegetation model.
Danny McCulloch, Denis E. Sergeev, Nathan Mayne, Matthew Bate, James Manners, Ian Boutle, Benjamin Drummond, and Kristzian Kohary
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 621–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-621-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present results from the Met Office Unified Model (UM) to study the dry Martian climate. We describe our model set-up conditions and run two scenarios, with radiatively active/inactive dust. We compare both scenarios to results from an existing Mars climate model, the planetary climate model. We find good agreement in winds and air temperatures, but dust amounts differ between models. This study highlights the importance of using the UM for future Mars research.
Sam-Erik Walker, Sverre Solberg, Philipp Schneider, and Cristina Guerreiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 573–595, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-573-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-573-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a statistical model for estimating trends in the daily air quality observations of NO2, O3, PM10 and PM2.5, adjusting for trends and short-term variations in meteorology. The model is general and may also be used for prediction purposes, including forecasting. It has been applied in a recent comprehensive study in Europe. Significant declines are shown for the pollutants from 2005 to 2019, mainly due to reductions in emissions not attributable to changes in meteorology.
Bianca Adler, James M. Wilczak, Jaymes Kenyon, Laura Bianco, Irina V. Djalalova, Joseph B. Olson, and David D. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 597–619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Rapid changes in wind speed make the integration of wind energy produced during persistent orographic cold-air pools difficult to integrate into the electrical grid. By evaluating three versions of NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model, we demonstrate how model developments targeted during the second Wind Forecast Improvement Project improve the forecast of a persistent cold-air pool event.
John Douros, Henk Eskes, Jos van Geffen, K. Folkert Boersma, Steven Compernolle, Gaia Pinardi, Anne-Marlene Blechschmidt, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Augustin Colette, and Pepijn Veefkind
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 509–534, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We focus on the challenges associated with comparing atmospheric composition models with satellite products such as tropospheric NO2 columns. The aim is to highlight the methodological difficulties and propose sound ways of doing such comparisons. Building on the comparisons, a new satellite product is proposed and made available, which takes advantage of higher-resolution, regional atmospheric modelling to improve estimates of troposheric NO2 columns over Europe.
Catalina Poraicu, Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Dominique Fonteyn, Frederik Tack, Felix Deutsch, Quentin Laffineur, Roeland Van Malderen, and Nele Veldeman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 479–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution WRF-Chem simulations are conducted over Antwerp, Belgium, in June 2019 and evaluated using meteorological data and in situ, airborne, and spaceborne NO2 measurements. An intercomparison of model, aircraft, and TROPOMI NO2 columns is conducted to characterize biases in versions 1.3.1 and 2.3.1 of the satellite product. A mass balance method is implemented to provide improved emissions for simulating NO2 distribution over the study area.
Daan R. Scheepens, Irene Schicker, Kateřina Hlaváčková-Schindler, and Claudia Plant
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 251–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The production of wind energy is increasing rapidly and relies heavily on atmospheric conditions. To ensure power grid stability, accurate predictions of wind speed are needed, especially in the short range and for extreme wind speed ranges. In this work, we demonstrate the forecasting skills of a data-driven deep learning model with model adaptations to suit higher wind speed ranges. The resulting model can be applied to other data and parameters, too, to improve nowcasting predictions.
Koichi Sakaguchi, L. Ruby Leung, Colin M. Zarzycki, Jihyeon Jang, Seth McGinnis, Bryce E. Harrop, William C. Skamarock, Andrew Gettelman, Chun Zhao, William J. Gutowski, Stephen Leak, and Linda Mearns
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1199, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We document details of the regional climate downscaling dataset produced by a global variable-resolution model. The experiment is unique for its following a standard protocol designed for coordinated experiments of regional models. Negligible influence of post-processing on statistical analysis, importance of simulation quality outside of the target region, and computational challenges that our model code faced under rapidly changing super computer systems are illustrated.
Peter J. M. Bosman and Maarten C. Krol
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 47–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-47-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-47-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We describe an inverse modelling framework constructed around a simple model for the atmospheric boundary layer. This framework can be fed with various observation types to study the boundary layer and land–atmosphere exchange. With this framework, it is possible to estimate model parameters and the associated uncertainties. Some of these parameters are difficult to obtain directly by observations. An example application for a grassland in the Netherlands is included.
Sudipta Ghosh, Sagnik Dey, Sushant Das, Nicole Riemer, Graziano Giuliani, Dilip Ganguly, Chandra Venkataraman, Filippo Giorgi, Sachchida Nand Tripathi, Srikanthan Ramachandran, Thazhathakal Ayyappen Rajesh, Harish Gadhavi, and Atul Kumar Srivastava
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate representation of aerosols in climate models is critical for minimizing the uncertainty in climate projections. Here, we implement region-specific emission fluxes and a more accurate scheme for carbonaceous aerosol ageing processes in a regional climate model (RegCM4) and show that it improves model performance significantly against in situ, reanalysis, and satellite data over the Indian subcontinent. We recommend improving the model performance before using them for climate studies.
Chengzhu Zhang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Ryan Forsyth, Tom Vo, Shaocheng Xie, Zeshawn Shaheen, Gerald L. Potter, Xylar S. Asay-Davis, Charles S. Zender, Wuyin Lin, Chih-Chieh Chen, Chris R. Terai, Salil Mahajan, Tian Zhou, Karthik Balaguru, Qi Tang, Cheng Tao, Yuying Zhang, Todd Emmenegger, Susannah Burrows, and Paul A. Ullrich
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9031–9056, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9031-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9031-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system model (ESM) developers run automated analysis tools on data from candidate models to inform model development. This paper introduces a new Python package, E3SM Diags, that has been developed to support ESM development and use routinely in the development of DOE's Energy Exascale Earth System Model. This tool covers a set of essential diagnostics to evaluate the mean physical climate from simulations, as well as several process-oriented and phenomenon-based evaluation diagnostics.
Walter Hannah and Kyle Pressel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8999–9013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8999-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8999-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A multiscale modeling framework couples two models of the atmosphere that each cover different scale ranges. Traditionally, fluctuations in the small-scale model are not transported by the flow on the large-scale model grid, but this is hypothesized to be responsible for a persistent, unphysical checkerboard pattern. A method is presented to facilitate the transport of these small-scale fluctuations, analogous to how small-scale clouds and turbulence are transported in the real atmosphere.
Reimar Bauer, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Jörn Ungermann, May Bär, Markus Geldenhuys, and Lars Hoffmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8983–8997, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8983-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8983-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Mission Support System (MSS) is an open source software package that has been used for planning flight tracks of scientific aircraft in multiple measurement campaigns during the last decade. Here, we describe the MSS software and its use during the SouthTRAC measurement campaign in 2019. As an example for how the MSS software is used in conjunction with many datasets, we describe the planning of a single flight probing orographic gravity waves propagating up into the lower mesosphere.
Zhizhao Wang, Florian Couvidat, and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8957–8982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8957-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Air quality models need to reliably predict secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) at a reasonable computational cost. Thus, we developed GENOA v1.0, a mechanism reduction algorithm that preserves the accuracy of detailed gas-phase chemical mechanisms for SOA formation, thereby improving the practical use of actual chemistry in SOA models. With GENOA, a near-explicit chemical scheme was reduced to 2 % of its original size and computational time, with an average error of less than 3 %.
Felix Kleinert, Lukas H. Leufen, Aurelia Lupascu, Tim Butler, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8913–8930, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the effects of spatially aggregated upstream information as input for a deep learning model forecasting near-surface ozone levels. Using aggregated data from one upstream sector (45°) improves the forecast by ~ 10 % for 4 prediction days. Three upstream sectors improve the forecasts by ~ 14 % on the first 2 d only. Our results serve as an orientation for other researchers or environmental agencies focusing on pointwise time-series predictions, for example, due to regulatory purposes.
Brian T. Dinkelacker, Pablo Garcia Rivera, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Peter J. Adams, and Spyros N. Pandis
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8899–8912, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8899-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8899-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of a chemical transport model in reproducing PM2.5 concentrations and composition was evaluated at the finest scale using measurements from regulatory sites as well as a network of low-cost monitors. Total PM2.5 mass is reproduced well by the model during the winter when compared to regulatory measurements, but in the summer PM2.5 is underpredicted, mainly due to difficulties in reproducing regional secondary organic aerosol levels.
Shizhang Wang and Xiaoshi Qiao
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8869–8897, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8869-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8869-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A local data assimilation scheme (Local DA v1.0) was proposed to leverage the advantage of hybrid covariance, multiscale localization, and parallel computation. The Local DA can perform covariance localization in model space, observation space, or both spaces. The Local DA that used the hybrid covariance and double-space localization produced the lowest analysis and forecast errors among all observing system simulation experiments.
Randall V. Martin, Sebastian D. Eastham, Liam Bindle, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Thomas L. Clune, Christoph A. Keller, William Downs, Dandan Zhang, Robert A. Lucchesi, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Robert M. Yantosca, Yanshun Li, Lucas Estrada, William M. Putman, Benjamin M. Auer, Atanas L. Trayanov, Steven Pawson, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8731–8748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric chemistry models must be able to operate both online as components of Earth system models and offline as standalone models. The widely used GEOS-Chem model operates both online and offline, but the classic offline version is not suitable for massively parallel simulations. We describe a new generation of the offline high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) that enables high-resolution simulations on thousands of cores, including on the cloud, with improved access, performance, and accuracy.
Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Benjamin Murphy, Christian Hogrefe, and Barron H. Henderson
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-273, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-273, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emissions sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.
Daiwen Kang, Nicholas K. Heath, Robert C. Gilliam, Tanya L. Spero, and Jonathan E. Pleim
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8561–8579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8561-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8561-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A lightning assimilation (LTA) technique implemented in the WRF model's Kain–Fritsch (KF) convective scheme is updated and applied to simulations from regional to hemispheric scales using observed lightning flashes from ground-based lightning detection networks. Different user-toggled options associated with the KF scheme on simulations with and without LTA are assessed. The model's performance is improved significantly by LTA, but it is sensitive to various factors.
Sujeong Lim, Hyeon-Ju Gim, Ebony Lee, Seungyeon Lee, Won Young Lee, Yong Hee Lee, Claudio Cassardo, and Seon Ki Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8541–8559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface model (LSM) contains various uncertain parameters, which are obtained by the empirical relations reflecting the specific local region and can be a source of uncertainty. To seek the optimal parameter values in the snow-related processes of the Noah LSM over South Korea, we have implemented an optimization algorithm, a micro-genetic algorithm using the observations. As a result, the optimized snow parameters improve snowfall prediction.
Haochen Sun, Jimmy C. H. Fung, Yiang Chen, Zhenning Li, Dehao Yuan, Wanying Chen, and Xingcheng Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8439–8452, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a novel deep-learning layer, the broadcasting layer, to build an end-to-end LSTM-based deep-learning model for regional air pollution forecast. By combining the ground observation, WRF-CMAQ simulation, and the broadcasting LSTM deep-learning model, forecast accuracy has been significantly improved when compared to other methods. The broadcasting layer and its variants can also be applied in other research areas to supersede the traditional numerical interpolation methods.
Liang Wang, Bingcheng Wan, Shaohui Zhou, Haofei Sun, and Zhiqiu Gao
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1216, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1216, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The past 24-h TC trajectory and meteorological field data were used to forecast TC tracks in the Northwest Pacific from hours 6–72 based on GRU_CNN we proposed in this paper, which has better prediction results than traditional single deep-learning methods. The historical steering flow of cyclones has a significant effect on improving the accuracy of short-term forecasting, while, in long-term forecasting, the SST and geopotential height will have a particular impact.
Shunji Kotsuki, Takemasa Miyoshi, Keiichi Kondo, and Roland Potthast
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8325–8348, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8325-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Data assimilation plays an important part in numerical weather prediction (NWP) in terms of combining forecasted states and observations. While data assimilation methods in NWP usually assume the Gaussian error distribution, some variables in the atmosphere, such as precipitation, are known to have non-Gaussian error statistics. This study extended a widely used ensemble data assimilation algorithm to enable the assimilation of more non-Gaussian observations.
Martin Vojta, Andreas Plach, Rona L. Thompson, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8295–8323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8295-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8295-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In light of recent global warming, we aim to improve methods for modeling greenhouse gas emissions in order to support the successful implementation of the Paris Agreement. In this study, we investigate certain aspects of a Bayesian inversion method that uses computer simulations and atmospheric observations to improve estimates of greenhouse gas emissions. We explore method limitations, discuss problems, and suggest improvements.
Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Jasper F. Kok, Xiaohong Liu, Mingxuan Wu, Danny M. Leung, Douglas S. Hamilton, Louisa K. Emmons, Yue Huang, Neil Sexton, Jun Meng, and Jessica Wan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8181–8219, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8181-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8181-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study advances mineral dust parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM; version 6.1). Efforts include 1) incorporating a more physically based dust emission scheme; 2) updating the dry deposition scheme; and 3) revising the gravitational settling velocity to account for dust asphericity. Substantial improvements achieved with these updates can help accurately quantify dust–climate interactions using CAM, such as the dust-radiation and dust–cloud interactions.
Yan Ji, Bing Gong, Michael Langguth, Amirpasha Mozaffari, and Xiefei Zhi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-859, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-859, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Formulating the short-term precipitation forecasting as a video prediction task, a novel deep learning architecture CLGAN is proposed in this work. A benchmark data set is newly built for the task, on minute-level precipitation measurements. Our results show that the GAN-component of CLGAN encourages the model to generate predictions sharing statistical properties of observed precipitation, which makes it outperform the baseline in dichotomous and spatial scores for heavy precipitation events.
Alvaro Criado, Jan Mateu Armengol, Hervé Petetin, Daniel Rodríguez-Rey, Jaime Benavides, Marc Guevara, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Albert Soret, and Oriol Jorba
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1147, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1147, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The goal of this work is to derive and evaluate a general statistical post-processing tool specifically designed for the street scale that can be applied to any urban air quality system. Our data-fusion methodology corrects NO2 fields based on continuous hourly observations and experimental campaigns. This study able us to obtain exceedance probability maps of air quality standards. In 2019, 13 % of the Barcelona area had a 70 % or higher probability of exceeding the annual legal NO2 limit.
Zhe Feng, Joseph Hardin, Hannah C. Barnes, Jianfeng Li, L. Ruby Leung, Adam Varble, and Zhixiao Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1136, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1136, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
PyFLEXTRKR is a flexible atmospheric feature tracking framework with specific capabilities to track convective clouds from a variety of observations and model simulations. The package has a collection of multi-object identification algorithms and has been optimized for large datasets. This paper describes the algorithms and demonstrate applications on tracking deep convective cells and mesoscale convective systems from observations and model simulations at a wide range of scales.
Youhua Tang, Patrick C. Campbell, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Fanglin Yang, Barry Baker, Daniel Tong, Ariel Stein, Jianping Huang, Ho-Chun Huang, Li Pan, Jeff McQueen, Ivanka Stajner, Jose Tirado-Delgado, Youngsun Jung, Melissa Yang, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Tom Ryerson, Donald Blake, Joshua Schwarz, Jose-Luis Jimenez, James Crawford, Glenn Diskin, Richard Moore, Johnathan Hair, Greg Huey, Andrew Rollins, Jack Dibb, and Xiaoyang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7977–7999, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper compares two meteorological datasets for driving a regional air quality model: a regional meteorological model using WRF (WRF-CMAQ) and direct interpolation from an operational global model (GFS-CMAQ). In the comparison with surface measurements and aircraft data in summer 2019, these two methods show mixed performance depending on the corresponding meteorological settings. Direct interpolation is found to be a viable method to drive air quality models.
Cited articles
Ackerman, A., van Zanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Savic-Jovcic, V., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Krueger, S. K., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A., Moeng, C.-H., Nakamura, K., Ovtchinnikov, M., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Weinbrecht, S., and Zulauf, M.: Large-eddy simulations of a drizzling, stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1083–1110, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2582.1, 2009.
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: {T}he impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01174, 2004.
Axelsen, S. L. and van Dop, H.: Large-Eddy Simulations and observations of slope flow, Acta Geophysica, 57, 853–857, 2009.
Basu, S., Steeneveld, G. J., Holtslag, A. A. M., and Bosveld, F. C.: Large-Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Case Setup for GABLS3, in: 18th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Stockholm, Sweden, 9–13 June, 2008, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 8A.7, 2008.
Beare, R. J., Macvean, M. K., Holtslag, A. A. M., Cuxart, J., Esau, I., Golaz, J.-C., Jimenez, M. A., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., Lund, T. S., Lundquist, J. K., Mccabe, A., Moene, A. F., Noh, Y., Raasch, S., and Sullivan, P.: {A}n Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable Boundary Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 247–272, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-2820-6, 2006.
Beljaars, A. C. M.: {N}umerical schemes for parametrizations, in: Proceedings of the ECMWF Seminar on Numerical Methods in Atmospheric Models, ECMWF, 1–42, 1991.
Betts, A. K.: {P}arametric interpretation of trade-wind cumulus budget studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1934–1945, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1934:PIOTWC>2.0.CO;2, 1975.
Bou-Zeid, E., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M.: A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows, Physics of Fluids, 17, 025105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839152, 2005.
Bretherton, C. S., Krueger, S. K., Wyant, M. C., Bechtold, P., Meijgaard, E. V., Stevens, B., and Teixeira, J.: A {GCSS} boundary-layer cloud model intercomparison study of the first {ASTEX L}agrangian experiment, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 93, 341–380, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002005429969, 1999a.
Bretherton, C. S., Mac{V}ean, M. K., Bechtold, P., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D. C., Moeng, C.-H., Siebesma, A. P., Stevens, B., Stevens, D. E., I.Sykes, and Wyant, M. C.: {A}n intercomparison radiatively-driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 391–423, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555402, 1999b.
Bretherton, C. S., Mc{C}aa, J. R., and Grenier, H.: A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. P}art {I}: {D}escription and 1{D results, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 864–882, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0864:ANPFSC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Bretherton, C. S., Blossey, P. N., and Uchida, J.: {C}loud droplet sedimentation, entrainment efficiency, and subtropical stratocumulus albedo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 3307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027648, 2007.
Brown, A. R., Cederwall, R. T., Chlond, A., Duynkerke, P. G., Golaz, J. C., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A. P., Mac{V}ean, M. K., Moeng, C.-H., Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Stevens, B.: {L}arge-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 128, 1075–1093, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002320373210, 2002.
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 181–189, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO;2, 1971.
Cahalan, R. and Joseph, J.: Fractal statistics of cloud fields, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0261:FSOCF>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Cahalan, R. F., Oreopoulos, L., Marshak, A., Evans, K. F., Davis, A. B., Pincus, R., Yetzer, K. H., Mayer, B., Davies, R., Ackerman, T. P., Barker, H. W., Clothiaux, E. E., Ellingson, R. G., Garay, M. J., Kassianov, E., Kinne, S., Macke, A., O'Hirok, W., Partain, P. T., Prigarin, S. M., Rublev, A. N., Stephens, G. L., Szczap, F., Takara, E. E., V{á}rnai, T., Wen, G., and Zhuravleva, T. B.: {T}he {I3RC}: {B}ringing together the most advanced radiative transfer tools for cloudy atmospheres, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 1275–1293, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-9-1275, 2005.
Cuijpers, J. W. M.: {S}ubgrid Parameterization in a large-eddy simulation model, in: Ninth Symp. on Turbulence and Diffusion, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Roskilde, Denmark, 176–179, 1990.
Cuijpers, J. W. M. and Duynkerke, P. G.: {L}arge-eddy simulation of trade-wind cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 151–162, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0151:IOSANE>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
de Roode, S. R., Duynkerke, P. G., and Jonker, H. J. J.: {L}arge-eddy simulation: {H}ow large is large enough?, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 403–421, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0403:LSHLIL>2.0.CO;2, 2004a.
de Roode, S. R., Jonker, H. J. J., Duynkerke, P. G., and Stevens, B.: {C}ountergradient fluxes of conserved variables in the clear convective and stratocumulus-topped boundary layer: {T}he role of the entrainment flux, Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 179–196, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020167.25780.16, 2004b.
de Roode, S. R.: {T}he role of eddy diffusivity profiles on stratocumulus liquid water path biases, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 2786–2793, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3426.1, 2007.
de Roode, S. R. and Los, A.: The effect of temperature and humidity fluctuations on the liquid water path of non-precipitating closed-cell stratocumulus, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 403–416, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.222, 2008.
de Rooy, W. C. and Siebesma, A. P.: A {s}imple {p}arameterization for {d}etrainment in {s}hallow {c}umulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 560–576, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2201.1, 2008.
Deardorff, J. W.: {T}heoretical expression for the counter-gradient vertical heat flux, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 5900–5904, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC077i030p05900, 1972.
Deardorff, J. W.: Three-dimensional numerical modeling of the planetary boundary layer, in: Workshop on Meteorology, edited by: Haugen, D. A., American Meteorological Society, 271–311, 1973.
Deardorff, J. W.: {S}tratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three dimensional model, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119502, 1980.
Dosio, A. and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {S}tatistics of absolute and relative dispersion in the atmospheric convective boundary layer: a Large-Eddy Simulation study, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1253–1272, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3689.1, 2006.
Dosio, A., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., Holtslag, A. A. M., and Builtjes, P. J. H.: {D}ispersion of a passive tracer in buoyancy- and shear-driven boundary layers., J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 1116–1130, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1116:DOAPTI>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Dosio, A., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., Holtslag, A. A. M., and Builtjes, P. J. H.: {R}elating {E}ulerian and {L}agrangian statistics for the turbulent dispersion in the atmospheric convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1175–1191, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3393.1, 2005.
Duda, D. P., Stephens, G. L., and Cox, S. K.: {M}icrophysical and radiative properties of marine stratocumulus from tethered balloon measurements, J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 170–186, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0170:MARPOM>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Duynkerke, P., Jonker, P., Chlond, A., van Zanten, M., Cuxart, J., Clark, P., Sanchez, E., Martin, G., Lenderink, G., and Teixeira, J.: {I}ntercomparison of three- and one-dimensional model simulations and aircraft observations of stratocumulus, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 92, 453–487, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002006919256, 1999.
Duynkerke, P. G.: Turbulence, radiation and fog in Dutch Stable Boundary Layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 90, 447–477, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026441904734, 1999.
Duynkerke, P. G., de Roode, S. R., Van Zanten, M. C., et al.: Observations and numerical simulation of the diurnal cycle of the EUROCS stratocumulus case, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 3269–3296, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.139, 2004.
Emanuel, K. A.: {A}tmospheric Convection, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
Fedorovich, E., Conzemius, R., and Mironov, D.: Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linearly stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large-eddy simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 281–295, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0281:CEIASL>2.0.CO;2, 2004a.
Fedorovich, E., R.Conzemius, Esau, I., Chow, F. K., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C.-H., Sullivan, P., Pino, D., and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {E}ntrainment Into Sheared Convective Boundary Layers As Predicted By Different Large Eddy Simulation Codes, in: The 16th Symposium on Boundary-Layers and Turbulence, 2004b.
Fouquart, Y.: {R}adiation in boundary layer clouds, in: Report, JSC/CAS Workshop on Modelling of Cloud-Topped Boundary Layer, Fort Collins, CO, WMO/TD 75, Appendix D, 40 pp, 1985.
Fu, Q. and Liou, K.: On the Correlated k-Distribution Method for Radiative Transfer in Nonhomogenecous Atmospheres, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 2139–2156, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2139:OTCDMF>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Fu, Q., Liou, K. N., Cribb, M. C., Charlock, T. P., and Grossman, A.: Multiple Scattering Parameterization in Thermal Infrared Radiative Transfer, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2799–2812, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2799:MSPITI%>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Galmarini, S., Beets, C., Duynkerke, P., and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Stable Nocturnal Boundary Layers: A Comparison of One-Dimensional and Large-Eddy Simulation Models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 88, 181–210, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001158702252, 1998.
Gao, S., Gao, Z., and Voke, P.: Balance Equatios in Finite-Volume Large-Eddy Simulations, Tech. rep., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Surrey University, England, 1994.
Geoffroy, O., Brenguier, J.-L., and Burnet, F.: Parametric representation of the cloud droplet spectra for LES warm bulk microphysical schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4835–4848, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4835-2010, 2010.
Geoffroy, O., Siebesma, A. P, and Burnet, F.: Parametric representation of the rain drop spectra for bulk microphysics, in preparation , 2010.
G{ó}rska, M., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., LeMone, M., and van Heerwaarden, C.: Mean and Flux Horizontal Variability of Virtual Potential Temperature, Moisture, and Carbon Dioxide: Aircraft Observations and LES Study, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 4435–4451, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2230.1, 2008.
Haiden, T. and Whiteman, C. D.: Katabatic Flow Mechanisms on a Low-Angle Slope, J. Appl. Metor., 44, 113–126., https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM-2182.1, 2005.
Heus, T. and Jonker, H. J. J.: {S}ubsiding {s}hells around {s}hallow {c}umulus {c}louds, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1003–1018, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2322.1, 2008.
Heus, T., van Dijk, G., Jonker, H. J. J., and van den Akker, H. E. A.: {M}ixing in shallow cumulus clouds studied by {L}agrangian particle tracking, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 2581–2597, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2572.1, 2008.
Heus, T., Pols, C. F. J., Jonker, H. J. J., van den Akker, H. E. A. and Lenschow, D. H.: Observational validation of the compensating mass flux through the shell around cumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 101–112 2009.
Holtslag, B.: Preface: GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary-layer Study (GABLS) on Stable Boundary Layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 243–246, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9008-6, 2006.
Hundsdorfer, W., Koren, B., Vanloon, M., and Verwer, J. G.: A positive finite-difference advection scheme, J. Comput. Phys., 117, 35–46, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1042, 1995.
Jarvis, P. G.: The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. Lon., 273B, 593–610, 1976.
Jonker, H. J. J., Duynkerke, P. G., and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: {M}esoscale fluctuations in scalars generated by boundary layer convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 801–808, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0801:MFISGB>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Jonker, H. J. J., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Duynkerke, P. G.: {C}haracteristic length scales of reactive species in a convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0041:CLSORS>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Jonker, H. J. J., Heus, T., and Sullivan, P. P.: A refined view of vertical transport by cumulus convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032606, 2008.
Joseph, J. H., Wiscombe, W. J., and Weinman, J. A.: {T}he delta-{E}ddington approximation for radiative flux transfer, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2452–2459, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2452:TDEAFR>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
Kaimal, J. and Finnigan, J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, USA, 1994.
Khairoutdinov, M. and Kogan, Y.: A new cloud physics parameterization in a large-eddy simulation model of marine stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<0229:ANCPPI>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Khanna, S. and Brasseur, J. G.: {T}hree-dimensional buoyancy and shear-induced local structure of the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 710–743, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0710:TDBASI>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Kim, S. W., Park, S. U., Pino, D., and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Parameterization of entrainment in a sheared convec boundary layer using a first-order jump model, J. Atmos. Sci., 120, 455–475, 2006.
Kosovi{ć}, B. and Curry, J.: A Large Eddy Simulation Study of a Quasi-Steady, Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1052–1068, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1052:ALESSO>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Krol, M. C., Molemaker, M. J., and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {E}ffects of turbulence and heterogeneous emissions on photochemically active species in the convective boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6871–6884, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900958, 2000.
Larson, V. E., Kotenberg, K. E., and Wood, N. B.: An analytic longwave radiation formula for liquid layer clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 689–699, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3315.1, 2007.
Lilly, D.: {M}odels of cloud-topped mixed layers under a strong inversion, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 292–309, 1968.
Lilly, D. K.: {T}he representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments, in: Proc. IBM Scientific Computing symp. on Environmental Sciences, edited by: Goldstine, H., 195–210, 1967.
Louis, J. F.: A parametric model of vertical fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117978, 1979.
Marshall, J. and Palmer, W.: The distribution of raindrops with size, J. Meteorol., 5, 165–166, 1948.
Neggers, R. A. J., Duynkerke, P. G., and Rodts, S. M. A.: S}hallow cumulus convection: {A validation of large-eddy simulation against aircraft and {L}andsat observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 2671–2696, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.93, 2003a.
Neggers, R. A. J., Jonker, H. J. J., and Siebesma, A. P.: {S}ize statistics of cumulus cloud populations in large-eddy simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1060–1074, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60<1060:SSOCCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003b.
Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Heus, T.: T}he {KNMI Parameterization Testbed, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., in preparation , 2010.
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. and Brost, R. A.: {T}he decay of convective turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 532–546, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0532:TDOCT>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. and de Valk, J. P. J. M. M.: A {L}arge eddy simulation of buoyant and non-buoyant plume dispersion in the atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 21, 2573–2587, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90189-2, 1987.
Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models, Mon. Weather Rev., 3, 536–549,1989.
Petersen, A. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: A first-order closure for covariances and fluxes of reactive species in the convective boundary layer, J. Appl. Meteor., 38, 1758–1776, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1758:AFOCFC>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Petersen, A. C., Beets, C., van Dop, H., Duynkerke, P. G., and Siebesma, A. P.: {M}ass-{f}lux {c}haracteristics of {r}eactive {s}calars in the {c}onvective {b}oundary {l}ayer, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 37–56, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0037:MFCORS>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Pincus, R. and Stevens, B.: Monte Carlo Spectral Integration: a Consistent Approximation for Radiative Transfer in Large Eddy Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 1, 1, 9 pp., https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.1, 2009.
Pino, D. and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Effects of the shear in the convective boundary layer: {A}nalysis of the turbulent kinetic energy budget, Acta Geophysica, 56, 167–193, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0037-z, 2008.
Pino, D., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Duynkerke, P. G.: {T}he contribution of shear to the evolution of a convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1913–1926, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1913:TCOSTT>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Pino, D., Jonker, H. J. J., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Dosio, A.: Role of the shear and inversion strength during sunset turbulence over land, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 121, 537–556, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9080-6, 2006a.
Pino, D., Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Kim, S. W.: Representing sheared convective boundary layer by zeroth- and first-order jump mixed layer models: large-eddy simulation verification, J. Appl. Meteor., 45, 1224–1243, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1913:TCOSTT>2.0.CO;2, 2006b.
Pinsky, M. B. and Khain, A. P.: Effects of in-cloud nucleation and turbulence on droplet spectrum formation in cumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 128, 501–533, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002321042072, 2002.
Randall, D.: {C}onditional instability of the fist kind upside down, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 125–150, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<0125:CIOTFK>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Rauber, R. M., Stevens, B., Ochs, H. T., Knight, C. A., Albrecht, B. A., Blyth, A. M., Fairall, C. W., Jensen, J. B., Lasher-Trapp, S. G., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Vali, G., Anderson, J. R., Baker, B. A., Bandy, A. R., F., B., Brenguier, J.-L., Brewer, W. A., Brown, P. R. A., Chuang, P., Cotton, W. R., Di Girolamo, L., Geerts, B., Gerber, H., G{ö}ke, S., Gomes, L., Heikes, B. G., Hudson, J. G., Kollias, P., P., L. R., Krueger, S., Lenschow, D. H., Nuijens, L., O'Sullican, D. W. O., Rilling, R. A., Rogers, D. C., Siebesma, A. P., Snodgrass, E., Stith, J. L., Thornton, D. C., Tucker, S., Twohy, C. H., and Zuidema, P.: R}ain in (shallow) cumulus over the ocean – {T}he {RICO campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1912–1928, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-12-1912, 2007.
Rodts, S. M. A., Duynkerke, P. G., and Jonker, H. J. J.: {S}ize distributions and dynamical properties of shallow cumulus clouds from aircraft observations and satellite data, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1895–1912, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1895:SDADPO>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Rogers, R. R., Baumgardner, R. M., Ethier, S. A., Carter, D. A., and Ecklund, W. L.: Comparison of raindrop size distributions measured by radar wind profiler and by airplane, J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 694–699, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<0694:CORSDM>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Schumann, U.: {L}arge-eddy simulation of turbulent diffusion with chemical reactions in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1713–1729, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90056-5, 1989.
Schumann, U.: Large-eddy simulation of the up-slope boundary layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc, 116, 637–670, https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.49306, 1990.
Seifert, A.: On the parameterization of evaporation of raindrops as simulated by a one-dimensional rainshaft model, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3608–3619, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2586.1, 2008.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection, Atmos. Res., 59, 265–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0, 2001.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. {P}art 1: {M}odel description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4, 2006.
Shettle, E. P. and Weinman, J. A.: {T}he transfer of solar irradiance through inhomogeneous turbid atmospheres evaluated by {E}ddingtons approximation, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1048–1055, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<1048:TTOSIT>2.0.CO;2, 1970.
Siebesma, A. P. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: {E}valuation of parametric assumptions for shallow cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 650–666, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0650:EOPAFS>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Siebesma, A. P. and Jonker, H. J. J.: {A}nomalous scaling of cumulus cloud boundaries, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 214–217, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.214, 2000.
Siebesma, A. P., Bretherton, C. S., Brown, A., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J., Duynkerke, P. G., Jiang, H. L., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C. H., Sanchez, E., Stevens, B., and Stevens, D. E.: A large eddy simulation intercomparison study of shallow cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1201–1219, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)60<1201:ALESIS>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Simpson, J. and Wiggert, V.: {M}odels of precipitating cumulus towers, Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 471–489, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1969)097<0471:MOPCT>2.3.CO;2, 1969.
Smagorinsky, J.: G}eneral circulation experiments with the primitive equations: {I. {T}he basic equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2, 1963.
Sommeria, G.: {T}hree-dimensional simulation of turbulent processes in an undisturbed trade-wind boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 216–241, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0216:TDSOTP>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
Sommeria, G. and Deardorff, J. W.: {S}ubgrid-scale condensation in models of non-precipitating clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 344–355, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0344:SSCIMO>2.0.CO;2, 1977.
Stephens, G. L.: {T}he parameterization of radiation for numerical weather prediction and climate models, Mon. Weather Rev., 112, 826–867, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<0826:TPORFN>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Stevens, B.: {E}ntrainment in stratocumulus-topped mixed layers, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2663–2690, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.01.202, 2002.
Stevens, B. and Seifert, A.: Understanding macrophysical outcomes of microphysical choices in simulations of shallow cumulus convection, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 86a, 143–162, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.86A.143, 2008.
Stevens, B., Ackerman, A. S., Albrecht, B. A., Brown, A. R., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J., Duynkerke, P. G., Lewellen, D. C., Mac{V}ean, M. K., Neggers, R. A. J., Sanchez, E., Siebesma, A. P., and Stevens, D. E.: {S}imulations of trade wind cumuli under a strong inversion, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1870–1891, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1870:SOTWCU>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Stevens, B., Moeng, C. H., Ackerman, A. S., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., De Roode, S., Edwards, J., Golaz, J. C., Jiang, H. L., Khairoutdinov, M., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A., Muller, F., Stevens, D. E., Whelan, E., and Zhu, P.: {E}valuation of large-Eddy simulations via observations of nocturnal marine stratocumulus, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1443–1462, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2930.1, 2005.
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Springer, USA, 1988.
Sullivan, P. P., Moeng, C.-H., Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., and Mayor, S. D.: {S}tructure of the entrainmentzone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3042–3064, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<3042:SOTEZC>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Thomson, D. J.: {C}riteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech., 180, 529–556, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087001940, 1987.
van Heerwaarden, C. C. and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {R}elative humidity as an indicator for cloud formation over heterogeneous land surfaces, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3263–3277, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2591.1, 2008.
van Zanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Siebesma, A. P., et al.: RICO Intercomparison, in preparation , 2010.
Verwer, J. G.: Gauss seidel iterations for stiff nodes from chemical kinetics, J. Sci. Comput., 15, 1243–1250, 1994.
Verwer, J. G. and Simpson, D.: Explicit methods for stiff ODEs from atmosperic chemistry, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 18, 413–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9274(95)00068-6, 1995.
Verzijlbergh, R. A., Jonker, H. J. J., Heus, T., and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Turbulent dispersion in cloud-topped boundary layers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1289–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1289-2009, 2009.
Vil{à-Guerau de Arellano}, J. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: {T}he chemistry of a dry cloud: the effects of radiation and turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1573–1584, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1573:TCOADC>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Vil{à-Guerau de Arellano}, J., Dosio, A., Vinuesa, J. F., Holtslag, A. A. M., and Galmarini, S.: The dispersion of chemically reactive species in the atmospheric boundary layer, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 87, 23–38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0059-2, 2004.
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Patton, E. G.: Transport and chemical transformations influenced by shallow cumulus over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3219–3231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005, 2005.
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., van den Dries, K., and Pino, D.: On inferring isoprene emission surface flux from atmospheric boundary layer concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3629–3640, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3629-2009, 2009.
Vinuesa, J. F. and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {F}luxes and (co-)variances of reacting scalars in the convective boundary layer, Tellus B, 55, 935–949, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1435-6935.2003.00073.x, 2003.
Vinuesa, J. F. and Vil{à}-Guerau de Arellano, J.: {I}ntroducing effective reaction rates to account for the inefficient mixing in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 39, 445–461, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.003, 2005.
Weil, J. C., Sullivan, P. P., and Moeng, C. H.: {T}he use of large-eddy simulations in {L}agrangian particle dispersion models, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2877–2887, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3302.1, 2004.
Wesseling, P.: Von Neumann stability conditions for the convection-diffusion equation, IMA J. Num. Anal., 16, 583–598, https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/16.4.583, 1996.
Wicker, L. J. and Skamarock, W. C.: {T}ime-{s}plitting {m}ethods for {e}lastic {m}odels {u}sing {f}orward {t}ime {s}chemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 2088–2097, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2088:TSMFEM>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Wilson, D. K.: An alternative function for the wind and temperature gradients in unstable surface layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 151–158, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018718707419, 2001.
Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward numerical modeling in the "Terra Incognita", J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1816:TNMITT>2.0.CO;2,2004.
Yaglom, A. M.: Comments on wind and temperature flux-profile relationships, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 11, 89–102, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221826, 1977.
Zilitinkevich, S. S., Elperin, T., Kleeorin, N., and Rogachevskii, I.: Energy- and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure model for stably stratified flows. Part I: steady-state, homogeneous regimes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 125, 167–191, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9189-2, 2007.