Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-919-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-919-2012
Model description paper
 | 
05 Jul 2012
Model description paper |  | 05 Jul 2012

MAESPA: a model to study interactions between water limitation, environmental drivers and vegetation function at tree and stand levels, with an example application to [CO2] × drought interactions

R. A. Duursma and B. E. Medlyn

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Global agricultural ammonia emissions simulated with the ORCHIDEE land surface model
Maureen Beaudor, Nicolas Vuichard, Juliette Lathière, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Didier Hauglustaine
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1053–1081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023, 2023
Short summary
ForamEcoGEnIE 2.0: incorporating symbiosis and spine traits into a trait-based global planktic foraminiferal model
Rui Ying, Fanny M. Monteiro, Jamie D. Wilson, and Daniela N. Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 813–832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-813-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-813-2023, 2023
Short summary
FABM-NflexPD 2.0: testing an instantaneous acclimation approach for modeling the implications of phytoplankton eco-physiology for the carbon and nutrient cycles
Onur Kerimoglu, Markus Pahlow, Prima Anugerahanti, and Sherwood Lan Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-95-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-95-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluating the vegetation–atmosphere coupling strength of ORCHIDEE land surface model (v7266)
Yuan Zhang, Devaraju Narayanappa, Philippe Ciais, Wei Li, Daniel Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Martin G. De Kauwe, Laurent Li, and Fabienne Maignan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9111–9125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022, 2022
Short summary
Non-Redfieldian carbon model for the Baltic Sea (ERGOM version 1.2) – implementation and budget estimates
Thomas Neumann, Hagen Radtke, Bronwyn Cahill, Martin Schmidt, and Gregor Rehder
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8473–8540, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8473-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8473-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ainsworth, E. A. and Long, S. P.: What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2, New Phytol., 165, 351–371, 2005.
Ainsworth, E. A. and Rogers, A.: The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions, Plant Cell Environ., 30, 258–270, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x, 2007.
Atkinson, C. and Taylor, J.: Effects of elevated CO2 on stem growth, vessel area and hydraulic conductivity of oak and cherry seedlings, New Phytol., 133, 617–626, 1996.
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions., in: Progress in photosynthesis research, edited by: Biggins, J., Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 221–224, 1987.
Barton, C. V. M., Ellsworth, D. S., Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., Tissue, D. T., Adams, M. A., Eamus, D., Conroy, J. P., McMurtrie, R. E., Parsby, J., and Linder, S.: Whole-tree chambers for elevated atmospheric CO2 experimentation and tree scale flux measurements in south-eastern Australia: The Hawkesbury Forest Experiment, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 941–951, 2010.