Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1609-1619, 2014
http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/1609/2014/
doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1609-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Development and technical paper
07 Aug 2014
Limiting the parameter space in the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
S. Kemp1, M. Scholze2, T. Ziehn3, and T. Kaminski4 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, VIC 3195, Australia
4FastOpt GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract. Terrestrial ecosystem models are employed to calculate the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide between land and atmosphere. These models may be heavily parameterised. Where reliable estimates are unavailable for a parameter, it remains highly uncertain; uncertainty of parameters can substantially contribute to overall model output uncertainty. This paper builds on the work of the terrestrial Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS), which, here, assimilates atmospheric CO2 concentrations to optimise 19 parameters of the underlying terrestrial ecosystem model (Biosphere Energy Transfer and Hydrology scheme, BETHY). Previous experiments have shown that the identified minimum may contain non-physical parameter values. One way to combat this problem is to use constrained optimisation and so avoid the optimiser searching non-physical regions. Another technique is to use penalty terms in the cost function, which are added when the optimisation searches outside of a specified region. The use of parameter transformations is a further method of avoiding this problem, where the optimisation is carried out in a transformed parameter space, thus ensuring that the optimal parameters at the minimum are in the physical domain. We compare these different methods of achieving meaningful parameter values, finding that the parameter transformation method shows consistent results and that the other two provide no useful results.

Citation: Kemp, S., Scholze, M., Ziehn, T., and Kaminski, T.: Limiting the parameter space in the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1609-1619, doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1609-2014, 2014.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share