Journal Metrics

  • IF value: 6.086 IF 6.086
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 6.174 IF 5-year
    6.174
  • SNIP value: 1.812 SNIP 1.812
  • IPP value: 5.140 IPP 5.140
  • SJR value: 3.969 SJR 3.969
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 303-315, 2014
www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/303/2014/
doi:10.5194/gmd-7-303-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions
S. M. Miller1, A. M. Michalak2, and P. J. Levi1
1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
2Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract. Many inverse problems in the atmospheric sciences involve parameters with known physical constraints. Examples include nonnegativity (e.g., emissions of some urban air pollutants) or upward limits implied by reaction or solubility constants. However, probabilistic inverse modeling approaches based on Gaussian assumptions cannot incorporate such bounds and thus often produce unrealistic results. The atmospheric literature lacks consensus on the best means to overcome this problem, and existing atmospheric studies rely on a limited number of the possible methods with little examination of the relative merits of each.

This paper investigates the applicability of several approaches to bounded inverse problems. A common method of data transformations is found to unrealistically skew estimates for the examined example application. The method of Lagrange multipliers and two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods yield more realistic and accurate results. In general, the examined MCMC approaches produce the most realistic result but can require substantial computational time. Lagrange multipliers offer an appealing option for large, computationally intensive problems when exact uncertainty bounds are less central to the analysis. A synthetic data inversion of US anthropogenic methane emissions illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.


Citation: Miller, S. M., Michalak, A. M., and Levi, P. J.: Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 303-315, doi:10.5194/gmd-7-303-2014, 2014.
 
Search GMD
Final Revised Paper
PDF XML
Citation
Discussion Paper
Share