Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2701-2722, 2015
http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/8/2701/2015/
doi:10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
01 Sep 2015
Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83)
A. L. Atchley1, S. L. Painter2, D. R. Harp1, E. T. Coon1, C. J. Wilson1, A. K. Liljedahl3,4, and V. E. Romanovsky5 1Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
2Climate Change Science Institute, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
3Water and Environmental Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USA
4International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USA
5Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USA
Abstract. Climate change is profoundly transforming the carbon-rich Arctic tundra landscape, potentially moving it from a carbon sink to a carbon source by increasing the thickness of soil that thaws on a seasonal basis. However, the modeling capability and precise parameterizations of the physical characteristics needed to estimate projected active layer thickness (ALT) are limited in Earth system models (ESMs). In particular, discrepancies in spatial scale between field measurements and Earth system models challenge validation and parameterization of hydrothermal models. A recently developed surface–subsurface model for permafrost thermal hydrology, the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS), is used in combination with field measurements to achieve the goals of constructing a process-rich model based on plausible parameters and to identify fine-scale controls of ALT in ice-wedge polygon tundra in Barrow, Alaska. An iterative model refinement procedure that cycles between borehole temperature and snow cover measurements and simulations functions to evaluate and parameterize different model processes necessary to simulate freeze–thaw processes and ALT formation. After model refinement and calibration, reasonable matches between simulated and measured soil temperatures are obtained, with the largest errors occurring during early summer above ice wedges (e.g., troughs). The results suggest that properly constructed and calibrated one-dimensional thermal hydrology models have the potential to provide reasonable representation of the subsurface thermal response and can be used to infer model input parameters and process representations. The models for soil thermal conductivity and snow distribution were found to be the most sensitive process representations. However, information on lateral flow and snowpack evolution might be needed to constrain model representations of surface hydrology and snow depth.

Citation: Atchley, A. L., Painter, S. L., Harp, D. R., Coon, E. T., Wilson, C. J., Liljedahl, A. K., and Romanovsky, V. E.: Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2701-2722, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015, 2015.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Development and calibration of a process-rich model representation of thaw-depth dynamics in Arctic tundra is presented. Improved understanding of polygonal tundra thermal hydrology processes, of thermal conduction, surface and subsurface saturation and snowpack dynamics is gained by using measured field data to calibrate and refine model structure. The refined model is then used identify future data needs and observational studies.
Development and calibration of a process-rich model representation of thaw-depth dynamics in...
Share