<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd"><rss version="0.91"><channel><title>GMD - Latest Articles</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/</link> <description>Geoscientific Model Development Latest Articles</description><language>en</language><item><title>A model for global biomass burning in preindustrial time: LPJ-LMfire (v1.0)</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/643/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;A model for global biomass burning in preindustrial time: LPJ-LMfire (v1.0)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 643-685, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): M. Pfeiffer, A. Spessa, and J. O. Kaplan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fire is the primary disturbance factor in many terrestrial ecosystems.
Wildfire alters vegetation structure and composition, affects carbon storage
and biogeochemical cycling, and results in the release of climatically
relevant trace gases including CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, CO, CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;,
NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;, and aerosols. One way of assessing the impacts of global
wildfire on centennial to multi-millennial timescales is to use process-based
fire models linked to dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). Here we
present an update to the LPJ-DGVM and a new fire module based on SPITFIRE
that includes several improvements to the way in which fire occurrence,
behaviour, and the effects of fire on vegetation are simulated. The new
LPJ-LMfire model includes explicit calculation of natural ignitions, the
representation of multi-day burning and coalescence of fires, and the
calculation of rates of spread in different vegetation types. We describe a
new representation of anthropogenic biomass burning under preindustrial
conditions that distinguishes the different relationships between humans and
fire among hunter-gatherers, pastoralists, and farmers. We evaluate our model
simulations against remote-sensing-based estimates of burned area at regional
and global scale. While wildfire in much of the modern world is largely
influenced by anthropogenic suppression and ignitions, in those parts of the
world where natural fire is still the dominant process (e.g. in remote areas
of the boreal forest and subarctic), our results demonstrate a significant
improvement in simulated burned area over the original SPITFIRE. The new fire
model we present here is particularly suited for the investigation of
climate–human–fire relationships on multi-millennial timescales prior to
the Industrial Revolution.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane   modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project   (WETCHIMP)</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/617/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane   modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project   (WETCHIMP)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 617-641, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. Wania, J. R. Melton, E. L. Hodson, B. Poulter, B. Ringeval, R. Spahni, T. Bohn, C. A. Avis, G. Chen, A. V. Eliseev, P. O. Hopcroft, W. J. Riley, Z. M. Subin, H. Tian, P. M. van Bodegom, T. Kleinen, Z. C. Yu, J. S. Singarayer, S. Zürcher, D. P. Lettenmaier, D. J. Beerling, S. N. Denisov, C. Prigent, F. Papa, and J. O. Kaplan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Wetland and Wetland CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Intercomparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP)
was created to evaluate our present ability to simulate large-scale wetland
characteristics and corresponding methane (CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) emissions. A multi-model
comparison is essential to evaluate the key uncertainties in the mechanisms
and parameters leading to methane emissions. Ten modelling groups joined
WETCHIMP to run eight global and two regional models with a common
experimental protocol using the same climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide
(CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) forcing datasets. We reported
 the main conclusions from the intercomparison effort in a companion
  paper (Melton et al., 2013). Here
we provide technical details for the six experiments, which included an
equilibrium, a transient, and an optimized run plus three sensitivity
experiments (temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
concentration). The diversity of approaches used by the models is summarized
through a series of conceptual figures, and is used to evaluate the wide
range of wetland extent and CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes predicted by the models in the
equilibrium run. We discuss relationships among the various approaches and
patterns in consistencies of these model predictions. Within this group of
models, there are three broad classes of methods used to estimate wetland
extent: prescribed based on wetland distribution maps, prognostic
relationships between hydrological states based on satellite observations,
and explicit hydrological mass balances. A larger variety of approaches was
used to estimate the net CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; fluxes from wetland systems. Even though
modelling of wetland extent and CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions has progressed
significantly over recent decades, large uncertainties still exist when
estimating CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions: there is little consensus on model structure or
complexity due to knowledge gaps, different aims of the models, and the range
of temporal and spatial resolutions of the models.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Evaluation of a near-global eddy-resolving ocean model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/591/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Evaluation of a near-global eddy-resolving ocean model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 591-615, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): P. R. Oke, D. A. Griffin, A. Schiller, R. J. Matear, R. Fiedler, J. Mansbridge, A. Lenton, M. Cahill, M. A. Chamberlain, and K. Ridgway&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Analysis of the variability of the last 18 yr (1993–2012) of a 32 yr run
of a new near-global, eddy-resolving ocean general circulation model coupled
with biogeochemistry is presented. Comparisons between modelled and observed
mean sea level (MSL), mixed layer depth (MLD), sea level anomaly (SLA), sea
surface temperature (SST), and {\chla} indicate that the model variability is
realistic. We find some systematic errors in the modelled MLD, with the model
generally deeper than observations, which results in errors in the {\chla},
owing to the strong biophysical coupling. We evaluate several other metrics
in the model, including the zonally averaged seasonal cycle of SST,
meridional overturning, volume transports through key straits and passages,
zonally averaged temperature and salinity, and El Niño-related SST
indices. We find that the modelled seasonal cycle in SST is
0.5–1.5 °C weaker than observed; volume transports of the Antarctic
Circumpolar Current, the East Australian Current, and Indonesian Throughflow
are in good agreement with observational estimates; and the correlation
between the modelled and observed NINO SST indices exceeds 0.91. Most aspects
of the model circulation are realistic. We conclude that the model output is
suitable for broader analysis to better understand upper ocean dynamics and
ocean variability at mid- and low latitudes. The new model is intended to
underpin a future version of Australia's operational short-range ocean
forecasting system.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Improving computational efficiency in large linear inverse problems: an example from carbon dioxide flux estimation</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/583/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Improving computational efficiency in large linear inverse problems: an example from carbon dioxide flux estimation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 583-590, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): V. Yadav and A. M. Michalak&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Addressing a variety of questions within Earth science disciplines entails
the inference of the spatiotemporal distribution of parameters of interest
based on observations of related quantities. Such estimation problems often
represent inverse problems that are formulated as linear optimization
problems. Computational limitations arise when the number of observations
and/or the size of the discretized state space becomes large, especially if
the inverse problem is formulated in a probabilistic framework and therefore
aims to assess the uncertainty associated with the estimates. This work
proposes two approaches to lower the computational costs and memory
requirements for large linear space–time inverse problems, taking the
Bayesian approach for estimating carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) emissions and uptake
(a.k.a. fluxes) as a prototypical example. The first algorithm can be used
to efficiently multiply two matrices, as long as one can be expressed as a
Kronecker product of two smaller matrices, a condition that is typical when
multiplying a sensitivity matrix by a covariance matrix in the solution of
inverse problems. The second algorithm can be used to compute a posteriori uncertainties
directly at aggregated spatiotemporal scales, which are the scales of most
interest in many inverse problems. Both algorithms have significantly lower
memory requirements and computational complexity relative to direct
computation of the same quantities (O(&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2.5&lt;/sup&gt;) vs. O(&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;)). For an
examined benchmark problem, the two algorithms yielded massive savings in
floating point operations relative to direct computation of the same
quantities. Sample computer codes are provided for assessing the
computational and memory efficiency of the proposed algorithms for matrices
of different dimensions.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>ECOCLIMAP-II/Europe: a twofold database of ecosystems and surface parameters at 1 km resolution based on satellite information for use in land surface, meteorological and climate models</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/563/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;ECOCLIMAP-II/Europe: a twofold database of ecosystems and surface parameters at 1 km resolution based on satellite information for use in land surface, meteorological and climate models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 563-582, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): S. Faroux, A. T. Kaptué Tchuenté, J.-L. Roujean, V. Masson, E. Martin, and P. Le Moigne&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The overall objective of the present study is to introduce the new
ECOCLIMAP-II database for Europe, which is an upgrade for this region of the
former initiative, ECOCLIMAP-I, already implemented at global scale. The
ECOCLIMAP programme is a dual database at 1 km resolution that includes an
ecosystem classification and a coherent set of land surface parameters that
are primarily mandatory in meteorological modelling (notably leaf area index
and albedo). Hence, the aim of this innovative physiography is to enhance
the quality of initialisation and impose some surface attributes within the
scope of weather forecasting and climate related studies. The strategy for
implementing ECOCLIMAP-II is to depart from prevalent land cover products
such as CLC2000 (Corine Land Cover) and GLC2000 (Global Land Cover) by
splitting existing classes into new classes that possess a better regional
character by virtue of the climatic environment (latitude, proximity to the
sea, topography). The leaf area index (LAI) from MODIS and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from
SPOT/Vegetation (a global monitoring system of vegetation) yield the two proxy variables that were considered here in
order to perform a multi-year trimmed analysis between 1999 and 2005 using
the K-means method. Further, meteorological applications require each land
cover type to appear as a partition of fractions of 4 main surface types or
tiles (nature, water bodies, sea, urban areas) and, inside the nature tile,
fractions of 12 plant functional types (PFTs) representing generic
vegetation types – principally broadleaf forest, needleleaf forest, C3 and
C4 crops, grassland and bare land – as incorporated by the SVAT model ISBA
(Interactions Surface Biosphere Atmosphere) developed at Météo France. This landscape division also forms the
cornerstone of a validation exercise. The new ECOCLIMAP-II can be verified
with auxiliary land cover products at very fine and coarse resolutions by
means of versatile land occupation nomenclatures.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Simulating the mid-Pliocene Warm Period with the CCSM4 model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/549/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Simulating the mid-Pliocene Warm Period with the CCSM4 model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 549-561, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): N. A. Rosenbloom, B. L. Otto-Bliesner, E. C. Brady, and P. J. Lawrence&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper describes the experimental design and model results from a 500 yr
fully coupled Community Climate System, version 4, simulation of the
mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP) (ca. 3.3–3.0 Ma). We simulate the mPWP
using the &quot;alternate&quot; protocol prescribed by the Pliocene Model
Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) for the AOGCM simulation (Experiment 2).
Results from the CCSM4 mPWP simulation show a 1.9 °C increase in
global mean annual temperature compared to the 1850 preindustrial control,
with a polar amplification of ~3 times the global warming. Global
precipitation increases slightly by 0.09 mm day&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; and the monsoon
rainfall is enhanced, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Areal sea
ice extent decreases in both hemispheres but persists through the summers.
The model simulates a relaxation of the zonal sea surface temperature (SST)
gradient in the tropical Pacific, with the El Niño–Southern Oscillation
(Niño3.4) ~20% weaker than the preindustrial and exhibiting
extended periods of quiescence of up to 150 yr. The maximum Atlantic
meridional overturning circulation and northward Atlantic oceanic heat
transport are indistinguishable from the control. As compared to PRISM3,
CCSM4 overestimates Southern Hemisphere (SH) sea surface temperatures, but
underestimates NH warming, particularly in the North Atlantic, suggesting
that an increase in northward ocean heat transport would bring CCSM4 SSTs
into better alignment with proxy data.</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>How should sparse marine in situ measurements be compared to a continuous model: an example</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/533/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;How should sparse marine in situ measurements be compared to a continuous model: an example&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 533-548, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): L. de Mora, M. Butenschön, and J. I. Allen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This work demonstrates an example of the importance of an adequate method to
sub-sample model results when comparing with in situ measurements. A test of
model skill was performed by employing a point-to-point method to compare
a multi-decadal hindcast against a sparse, unevenly distributed historic in
situ dataset. The point-to-point method masked out all hindcast cells that
did not have a corresponding in situ measurement in order to match each in
situ measurement against its most similar cell from the model. The
application of the point-to-point method showed that the model was successful
at reproducing the inter-annual variability of the in situ datasets.
Furthermore, this success was not immediately apparent when the measurements
were aggregated to regional averages. Time series, data density and target
diagrams were employed to illustrate the impact of switching from the
regional average method to the point-to-point method. The comparison based on
regional averages gave significantly different and sometimes contradicting
results that could lead to erroneous conclusions on the model performance.
Furthermore, the point-to-point technique is a more correct method to exploit
sparse uneven in situ data while compensating for the variability of its
sampling. We therefore recommend that researchers take into account for the
limitations of the in situ datasets and process the model to resemble the
data as much as possible.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Simulations of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period using two versions of the NASA/GISS ModelE2-R Coupled Model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/517/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Simulations of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period using two versions of the NASA/GISS ModelE2-R Coupled Model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 517-531, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): M. A. Chandler, L. E. Sohl, J. A. Jonas, H. J. Dowsett, and M. Kelley&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP) bears many similarities to aspects of
future global warming as projected by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC, 2007). Both marine and terrestrial data point to high-latitude
temperature amplification, including large decreases in sea ice and land
ice, as well as expansion of warmer climate biomes into higher latitudes.
Here we present our most recent simulations of the mid-Pliocene climate
using the CMIP5 version of the NASA/GISS Earth System Model (ModelE2-R). We
describe the substantial impact associated with a recent correction made in
the implementation of the Gent-McWilliams ocean mixing scheme (GM), which
has a large effect on the simulation of ocean surface temperatures,
particularly in the North Atlantic Ocean. The effect of this correction on
the Pliocene climate results would not have been easily determined from
examining its impact on the preindustrial runs alone, a useful demonstration
of how the consequences of code improvements as seen in modern climate
control runs do not necessarily portend the impacts in extreme climates.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Both the GM-corrected and GM-uncorrected simulations were contributed to the
Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) Experiment 2. Many findings
presented here corroborate results from other PlioMIP multi-model ensemble
papers, but we also emphasise features in the ModelE2-R simulations that are
unlike the ensemble means. The corrected version yields results that more
closely resemble the ocean core data as well as the PRISM3D reconstructions
of the mid-Pliocene, especially the dramatic warming in the North Atlantic
and Greenland-Iceland-Norwegian Sea, which in the new simulation appears to
be far more realistic than previously found with older versions of the GISS
model. Our belief is that continued development of key physical routines in
the atmospheric model, along with higher resolution and recent corrections
to mixing parameterisations in the ocean model, have led to an Earth System
Model that will produce more accurate projections of future climate.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Modeling agriculture in the Community Land Model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/495/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Modeling agriculture in the Community Land Model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 495-515, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): B. Drewniak, J. Song, J. Prell, V. R. Kotamarthi, and R. Jacob&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The potential impact of climate change on agriculture is uncertain. In
addition, agriculture could influence above- and below-ground carbon
storage. Development of models that represent agriculture is necessary to
address these impacts. We have developed an approach to integrate
agriculture representations for three crop types – maize, soybean, and
spring wheat – into the coupled carbon–nitrogen version of the Community
Land Model (CLM), to help address these questions. Here we present the new
model, CLM-Crop, validated against observations from two AmeriFlux sites in
the United States, planted with maize and soybean. Seasonal carbon fluxes
compared well with field measurements for soybean, but not as well for
maize. CLM-Crop yields were comparable with observations in countries such
as the United States, Argentina, and China, although the generality of the
crop model and its lack of technology and irrigation made direct comparison
difficult. CLM-Crop was compared against the standard CLM3.5, which
simulates crops as grass. The comparison showed improvement in gross primary
productivity in regions where crops are the dominant vegetation cover. Crop
yields and productivity were negatively correlated with temperature and
positively correlated with precipitation, in agreement with other modeling
studies. In case studies with the new crop model looking at impacts of
residue management and planting date on crop yield, we found that increased
residue returned to the litter pool increased crop yield, while reduced
residue returns resulted in yield decreases. Using climate controls to
signal planting date caused different responses in different crops. Maize
and soybean had opposite reactions: when low temperature threshold resulted
in early planting, maize responded with a loss of yield, but soybean yields
increased. Our improvements in CLM demonstrate a new capability in the model
– simulating agriculture in a realistic way, complete with fertilizer and
residue management practices. Results are encouraging, with improved
representation of human influences on the land surface and the potentially
resulting climate impacts.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>MESMO 2: a mechanistic marine silica cycle and coupling to a simple terrestrial scheme</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/477/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;MESMO 2: a mechanistic marine silica cycle and coupling to a simple terrestrial scheme&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 477-494, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): K. Matsumoto, K. Tokos, A. Huston, and H. Joy-Warren&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here we describe the second version of Minnesota Earth System Model for Ocean
biogeochemistry (MESMO 2), an earth system model of intermediate complexity,
which consists of a dynamical ocean, dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice, and
energy moisture balanced atmosphere. The new version has more realistic land
ice masks and is driven by seasonal winds. A major aim in version 2 is
representing the marine silica cycle mechanistically in order to investigate
climate-carbon feedbacks involving diatoms, a critically important class of
phytoplankton in terms of carbon export production. This is achieved in part
by including iron, on which phytoplankton uptake of silicic acid depends.
Also, MESMO 2 is coupled to an existing terrestrial model, which allows for
the exchange of carbon, water and energy between land and the atmosphere.
The coupled model, called MESMO 2E, is appropriate for more complete earth
system simulations. The new version was calibrated, with the goal of
preserving reasonable interior ocean ventilation and various biological
production rates in the ocean and land, while simulating key features of the
marine silica cycle.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>PORT, a CESM tool for the diagnosis of radiative forcing</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/469/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;PORT, a CESM tool for the diagnosis of radiative forcing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 469-476, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): A. J. Conley, J.-F. Lamarque, F. Vitt, W. D. Collins, and J. Kiehl&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parallel Offline Radiative Transfer (PORT) model is a stand-alone
tool, driven by model-generated datasets, that can be used for any radiation calculation
that the underlying radiative transfer schemes can perform, such as diagnosing radiative
forcing. In its present distribution, PORT isolates the radiation code from the Community
Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1). The current
configuration focuses on CAM4 radiation with the constituents as represented in
present-day conditions in CESM1, along with their optical properties. PORT includes an
implementation of stratospheric temperature adjustment under the assumption of fixed
dynamical heating, which is necessary to compute radiative forcing in
addition to the more straightforward instantaneous radiative forcing. PORT can be extended to use
radiative constituent distributions from other models or model simulations.  Ultimately,
PORT can be used with various radiative transfer models.
As illustrations of the use of PORT, we perform the computation of radiative forcing from
doubling of carbon dioxide, from the change of tropospheric ozone concentration from the year
1850 to 2000, and from present-day aerosols. The radiative forcing from tropospheric ozone (with
respect to 1850) generated by a collection of model simulations under the Atmospheric
Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project is found to be 0.34 (with an
intermodel standard deviation of 0.07) W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;. Present-day aerosol direct forcing
(relative to no aerosols) is found to be −1.3 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Inclusion of ash and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emissions from volcanic eruptions in WRF-Chem: development and some applications</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/457/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Inclusion of ash and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emissions from volcanic eruptions in WRF-Chem: development and some applications&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 457-468, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): M. Stuefer, S. R. Freitas, G. Grell, P. Webley, S. Peckham, S. A. McKeen, and S. D. Egan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We describe a new functionality within the Weather Research and Forecasting
(WRF) model with coupled Chemistry (WRF-Chem) that allows simulating
emission, transport, dispersion, transformation and sedimentation of
pollutants released during volcanic activities. Emissions from both an
explosive eruption case and a relatively calm degassing situation are
considered using the most recent volcanic emission databases. A preprocessor
tool provides emission fields and additional information needed to establish
the initial three-dimensional cloud umbrella/vertical distribution within the
transport model grid, as well as the timing and duration of an eruption. From
this source condition, the transport, dispersion and sedimentation of the ash
cloud can be realistically simulated by WRF-Chem using its own dynamics and
physical parameterization as well as data assimilation. Examples of model
applications include a comparison of tephra fall deposits from the 1989
eruption of Mount Redoubt (Alaska) and the dispersion of ash from the 2010
Eyjafjallajökull eruption in Iceland. Both model applications show good
coincidence between WRF-Chem and observations.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Evaluation of roadway Gaussian plume models with large-scale measurement campaigns</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/445/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Evaluation of roadway Gaussian plume models with large-scale measurement campaigns&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 445-456, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. Briant, C. Seigneur, M. Gadrat, and C. Bugajny&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gaussian models are commonly used to simulate atmospheric pollutant
  dispersion near sources because they provide an efficient compromise between
  reasonable accuracy and manageable computational time. The Gaussian
  dispersion formula provides an exact solution to the atmospheric diffusion
  equation for the dispersion of a pollutant emitted from a point
  source. However, the Gaussian dispersion formula for a line source, which is
  convenient to model emissions from on-road traffic, is exact only when the
  wind is perpendicular to the line source. A novel approach that reduces the
  error in the line source formula when the wind direction is not
  perpendicular to the road was recently developed. This model is used to
  simulate NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations in a large case study (1371 road sections
  representing about 831 km). NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, NO and O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;
  concentrations are then computed using the photostationary-state
  approximation. NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations are compared with measurements made
  at 242 locations in the domain area. Model performance is satisfactory with
  mean normalised errors of 22% (winter month) to 31% (summer
  month). Results obtained here are also compared with those obtained with a
  previous formulation and with a standard model used for regulatory
  applications, ADMS-Urban. Discrepancies among the results obtained with
  those models are discussed.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>Evaluating a lightning parameterization based on cloud-top height for mesoscale numerical model simulations</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/429/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Evaluating a lightning parameterization based on cloud-top height for mesoscale numerical model simulations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 429-443, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): J. Wong, M. C. Barth, and D. Noone&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Price and Rind lightning parameterization based on cloud-top
height is a commonly used method for predicting flash rate in global
chemistry models. As mesoscale simulations begin to implement flash rate
predictions at resolutions that partially resolve convection, it is necessary
to validate and understand the behavior of this method within such a regime. In
this study, we tested the flash rate parameterization,
intra-cloud/cloud-to-ground (IC:CG) partitioning parameterization, and
the associated resolution dependency &quot;calibration factor&quot; by
Price and Rind using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)
model running at 36 km, 12 km, and 4 km grid spacings
within the continental United States. Our results show that while the
integrated flash count is consistent with observations when model biases in
convection are taken into account, an erroneous frequency distribution is
simulated. When the spectral characteristics of lightning flash rate are a
concern, we recommend the use of prescribed IC:CG values. In addition,
using cloud-top from convective parameterization, the &quot;calibration factor&quot;
is also shown to be insufficient in reconciling the resolution dependency at
the tested grid spacing used in this study. We recommend scaling by areal
ratio relative to a base-case grid spacing determined by convective core
density.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>A new method to diagnose the contribution of anthropogenic activities to temperature: temperature tagging</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/417/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;A new method to diagnose the contribution of anthropogenic activities to temperature: temperature tagging&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 417-427, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): V. Grewe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This study presents a new methodology, called temperature tagging.
  It keeps track of the contributions of individual processes to
  temperature within a climate model simulation. As a first step and
  as a test bed, a simple box climate model is regarded.  The model
  consists of an atmosphere, which absorbs and emits radiation, and of
  a surface, which reflects, absorbs and emits radiation. The tagging
  methodology is used to investigate the impact of the atmosphere on
  surface temperature. Four processes are investigated in more
  detail and their contribution to the surface temperature quantified:
  (i) shortwave influx and shortwave atmospheric absorption (&quot;sw&quot;),
  (ii) longwave atmospheric absorption due to non-CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
  greenhouse gases (&quot;nC&quot;), (iii) due to a base case CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
  concentration (&quot;bC&quot;), and (iv) due to an enhanced CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
  concentration (&quot;eC&quot;).  The differential equation for the
  temperature in the box climate model is decomposed into four
  equations for the tagged temperatures. This method is applied to
  investigate the contribution of longwave absorption to the surface
  temperature (greenhouse effect), which is calculated to be
  68 K.  This estimate contrasts an alternative calculation of
  the greenhouse effect of slightly more than 30 K based on
  the difference of the surface temperature with and without an
  atmosphere. The difference of the two estimates is due to
  a shortwave cooling effect and a reduced contribution of the
  shortwave to the total downward flux: the shortwave absorption of the
  atmosphere results in a reduced net shortwave flux at the surface of
  192 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;, leading to a cooling of the surface by
  14 K.  Introducing an atmosphere results in a downward
  longwave flux at the surface due to atmospheric absorption of
  189 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;, which roughly equals the net shortwave flux
  of 192 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;. This longwave flux is a result of both
  the radiation due to atmospheric temperatures and its longwave
  absorption.  Hence the longwave absorption roughly accounts for
  91 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt; out of a total of 381 W m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;
  (roughly 25%) and therefore accounts for a temperature change of
  68 K.  In a second experiment, the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration
  is doubled, which leads to an increase in surface temperature of
  1.2 K, resulting from a temperature increase due to
  CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; of 1.9 K, due to non-CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; greenhouse
  gases of 0.6 K and a cooling of 1.3 K due to
  a reduced importance of the solar heating for the surface and
  atmospheric temperatures. These two experiments show the feasibility
  of temperature tagging and its potential as a diagnostic for climate
  simulations.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/389/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 389-415, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): T. Iversen, M. Bentsen, I. Bethke, J. B. Debernard, A. Kirkevåg, Ø. Seland, H. Drange, J. E. Kristjansson, I. Medhaug, M. Sand, and I. A. Seierstad&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NorESM is a generic name of the Norwegian earth system model. The first
version is named NorESM1, and has been applied with medium spatial resolution
to provide results for CMIP5
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/index.html&quot; target=_blank&gt;http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/index.html&lt;/a&gt;) without (NorESM1-M) and
with (NorESM1-ME) interactive carbon-cycling. Together with the accompanying
paper by Bentsen et al. (2012), this paper documents that the core version
NorESM1-M is a valuable global climate model for research and for providing
complementary results to the evaluation of possible anthropogenic climate
change. NorESM1-M is based on the model CCSM4 operated at NCAR, but the ocean
model is replaced by a modified version of MICOM and the atmospheric model is
extended with online calculations of aerosols, their direct effect and their
indirect effect on warm clouds. Model validation is presented in the
companion paper (Bentsen et al., 2012).  NorESM1-M  is estimated to have
equilibrium climate sensitivity of ca. 2.9 K and a transient climate
response of ca. 1.4 K. This sensitivity is in the lower range amongst the
models contributing to CMIP5. Cloud feedbacks dampen the response, and a
strong AMOC reduces the heat fraction available for increasing near-surface
temperatures, for evaporation and for melting ice. The future projections
based on RCP scenarios yield a global surface air temperature increase of
almost one standard deviation lower than a 15-model average. Summer sea-ice
is projected to decrease considerably by 2100 and disappear completely for
RCP8.5. The AMOC is projected to decrease by 12%, 15–17%, and 32%
for the RCP2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5, respectively. Precipitation is projected
to increase in the tropics, decrease in the subtropics and in southern parts
of the northern extra-tropics during summer, and otherwise increase in most
of the extra-tropics. Changes in the atmospheric water cycle indicate that
precipitation events over continents will become more intense and dry spells
more frequent. Extra-tropical storminess in the Northern Hemisphere is
projected to shift northwards. There are indications of more frequent
occurrence of spring and summer blocking in the Euro-Atlantic sector, while
the amplitude of ENSO events weakens although they tend to appear more
frequently. These indications are uncertain because of biases in the model's
representation of present-day conditions. Positive phase PNA and negative
phase NAO both appear less frequently under the RCP8.5 scenario, but also
this result is considered uncertain. Single-forcing experiments indicate that
aerosols and greenhouse gases produce similar geographical patterns of
response for near-surface temperature and precipitation. These patterns tend
to have opposite signs, although with important exceptions for precipitation
at low latitudes. The asymmetric aerosol effects between the two hemispheres
lead to a southward displacement of ITCZ. Both forcing agents, thus, tend to
reduce Northern Hemispheric subtropical precipitation.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>The OASIS3 coupler: a European climate modelling community software</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/373/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;The OASIS3 coupler: a European climate modelling community software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 373-388, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): S. Valcke&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper presents the OASIS3 coupling software used in five of the seven
European Earth System Models (ESMs) participating to the Fifth Coupled Model
Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). A short history of the coupler development
is followed by a technical description of OASIS3. The performances of a few
relatively high resolution models coupled with OASIS3 are then described. It
is shown that, although its limited field-per-field parallelism will
eventually become a bottleneck in the simulation, OASIS3 can still be
considered an appropriate tool for most of these relatively demanding coupled
configurations. Its successful use in different CMIP5 ESMs is then detailed.
A discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of the OASIS3's approach and a
presentation of planned developments conclude the paper.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Air quality modelling using the Met Office Unified Model (AQUM OS24-26): model description and initial evaluation</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/353/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Air quality modelling using the Met Office Unified Model (AQUM OS24-26): model description and initial evaluation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 353-372, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): N. H. Savage, P. Agnew, L. S. Davis, C. Ordóñez, R. Thorpe, C. E. Johnson, F. M. O'Connor, and M. Dalvi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The on-line air quality model AQUM (Air Quality in the Unified Model) is a
limited-area forecast configuration of the Met Office Unified Model which
uses the UKCA (UK Chemistry and Aerosols) sub-model. AQUM has been developed
with two aims: as an operational system to deliver regional air quality
forecasts and as a modelling system to conduct air quality studies to inform
policy decisions on emissions controls. This paper presents a description of
the model and the methods used to evaluate the performance of the forecast
system against the automated UK surface network of air quality monitors.
Results are presented of evaluation studies conducted for a year-long period
of operational forecast trials and several past cases of poor air quality
episodes. The results demonstrate that AQUM tends to over-predict ozone
(~8 μg m&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt; mean bias for the year-long forecast),
but has a good level of responsiveness to elevated ozone episode conditions
– a characteristic which is essential for forecasting poor air quality
episodes. AQUM is shown to have a negative bias for PM&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt;, while for
PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; the negative bias is much smaller in magnitude. An analysis of
speciated PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; data during an episode of elevated particulate matter
(PM) suggests that the PM bias occurs mainly in the coarse component. The
sensitivity of model predictions to lateral boundary conditions (LBCs) has
been assessed by using LBCs from two different global reanalyses and by
comparing the standard, single-nested configuration with a configuration
having an intermediate European nest. We conclude that, even with a much
larger regional domain, the LBCs remain an important source of model error
for relatively long-lived pollutants such as ozone. To place the model
performance in context we compare AQUM ozone forecasts with those of another
forecasting system, the MACC (Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate) ensemble, for a 5-month period. An analysis of
the variation of model skill with forecast lead time is presented and the
insights this provides to the relative sources of error in air quality
modelling are discussed.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Using model reduction to predict the soil-surface C&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;OO flux: an example of representing complex biogeochemical dynamics in a computationally efficient manner</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/345/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Using model reduction to predict the soil-surface C&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;OO flux: an example of representing complex biogeochemical dynamics in a computationally efficient manner&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 345-352, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): W. J. Riley&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earth system models (ESMs) must calculate large-scale interactions between
the land and atmosphere while accurately characterizing fine-scale spatial
heterogeneity in water, carbon, and other nutrient dynamics. We present here
a high-dimension model representation (HDMR) approach that allows detailed
process representation of a coupled carbon and water tracer (the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O
value of the soil-surface CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; flux (&amp;delta; &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;)) in a
computationally tractable manner. &amp;delta; &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; depends on the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O value of soil water, soil moisture and temperature, and soil
CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; production (all of which are depth dependent), and the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O value of above-surface CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. We tested the HDMR approach over
a growing season in a C&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;-dominated pasture using two vertical soil
discretizations. The difference between the HDMR approach and the full model
solution in the three-month integrated isoflux was less than 0.2%
(0.5 mol m&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt; &amp;permil;), and the approach is up to 100 times
faster than the full numerical solution. This type of model reduction
approach allows representation of complex coupled biogeochemical processes
in regional and global climate models and can be extended to characterize
subgrid-scale spatial heterogeneity.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Modeling atmospheric ammonia and ammonium using a stochastic  Lagrangian air quality model (STILT-Chem v0.7)</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/327/2013/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Modeling atmospheric ammonia and ammonium using a stochastic  Lagrangian air quality model (STILT-Chem v0.7)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 327-344, 2013&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): D. Wen, J. C. Lin, L. Zhang, R. Vet, and M. D. Moran&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new chemistry module that simulates atmospheric ammonia (NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;) and ammonium
(NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) was incorporated into a backward-in-time stochastic Lagrangian air
quality model (STILT-Chem) that was originally developed to simulate the
concentrations of a variety of gas-phase species at receptors. STILT-Chem
simulates the transport of air parcels backward in time using ensembles of
fictitious particles with stochastic motions, while accounting for emissions,
deposition and chemical transformation forward in time along trajectories
identified by the backward-in-time simulations. The incorporation of the new
chemistry module allows the model to simulate not only gaseous species, but
also multi-phase species involving NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;. The model was applied
to simulate concentrations of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and particulate NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; at six sites in
the Canadian province of Ontario for a six-month period in 2006. The
model-predicted concentrations of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and particulate NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; were
compared with observations, which show broad agreement between simulated
concentrations and observations. Since the model is based on back
trajectories, the influence of each major process such as emission,
deposition and chemical conversion on the concentration of a modeled species
at a receptor can be determined for every upstream location at each time
step. This makes it possible to quantitatively investigate the upstream
processes affecting receptor concentrations. The modeled results suggest that
the concentrations of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; at those sites were significantly and frequently
affected by Ohio, Iowa, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, southwestern Ontario and nearby areas. NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; is
mainly contributed by emission sources whereas particulate NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; is mainly
contributed by the gas-to-aerosol chemical conversion of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;. Dry
deposition is the largest removal process for both NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and particulate
NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;. This study revealed the contrast between agricultural versus forest
sites. Not only were emissions of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; higher, but removal mechanisms
(especially chemical loss for NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and dry deposition for NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) were
less efficient for agricultural sites. This combination explains the
significantly higher concentrations of NH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and particulate NH&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;
observed at agricultural sites.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>