Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 10, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1009-1031, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1009-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean - NEMO

Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1009-1031, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1009-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 03 Mar 2017

Model evaluation paper | 03 Mar 2017

Comparing sea ice, hydrography and circulation between NEMO3.6 LIM3 and LIM2

Petteri Uotila et al.
Data sets

NEMO version 3.6 NEMO website http://www.nemo-ocean.eu/

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
We performed ocean model simulations with new and old sea-ice components. Sea ice improved in the new model compared to the earlier one due to better model physics. In the ocean, the largest differences are confined close to the surface within and near the sea-ice zone. The global ocean circulation slowly deviates between the simulations due to dissimilar sea ice in the deep water formation regions, such as the North Atlantic and Antarctic.
We performed ocean model simulations with new and old sea-ice components. Sea ice improved in...
Citation
Share