Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 10, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 19–34, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental...

Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 19–34, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 02 Jan 2017

Methods for assessment of models | 02 Jan 2017

CPMIP: measurements of real computational performance of Earth system models in CMIP6

Venkatramani Balaji et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 2,639 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,623 897 119 2,639 140 136
  • HTML: 1,623
  • PDF: 897
  • XML: 119
  • Total: 2,639
  • BibTeX: 140
  • EndNote: 136
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 2,546 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,525 with geography defined and 21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
Latest update: 21 Sep 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the world. We present a set of measures of computational performance that can be used to compare models that are independent of underlying hardware and the model formulation. They are easy to collect and reflect performance actually achieved in practice. We are preparing a systematic effort to collect these metrics for the world's climate models during CMIP6, the next Climate Model Intercomparison Project.
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the...
Citation