Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year
    4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore
    4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 51 Scimago H
    index 51
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
Volume 10, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3207-3223, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3207-3223, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Review and perspective paper 01 Sep 2017

Review and perspective paper | 01 Sep 2017

Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six US modeling centers

Gavin A. Schmidt et al.
Related authors  
ESD Reviews: Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing
Gab Abramowitz, Nadja Herger, Ethan Gutmann, Dorit Hammerling, Reto Knutti, Martin Leduc, Ruth Lorenz, Robert Pincus, and Gavin A. Schmidt
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 91-105, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-91-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-91-2019, 2019
Short summary
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan
Masa Kageyama, Pascale Braconnot, Sandy P. Harrison, Alan M. Haywood, Johann H. Jungclaus, Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Jean-Yves Peterschmitt, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Samuel Albani, Patrick J. Bartlein, Chris Brierley, Michel Crucifix, Aisling Dolan, Laura Fernandez-Donado, Hubertus Fischer, Peter O. Hopcroft, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Fabrice Lambert, Daniel J. Lunt, Natalie M. Mahowald, W. Richard Peltier, Steven J. Phipps, Didier M. Roche, Gavin A. Schmidt, Lev Tarasov, Paul J. Valdes, Qiong Zhang, and Tianjun Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1033-1057, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018, 2018
Short summary
Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era
PAGES Hydro2k Consortium
Clim. Past, 13, 1851-1900, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1851-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1851-2017, 2017
Short summary
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: The last millennium, scientific objective, and experimental design for the PMIP4 past1000 simulations
Johann H. Jungclaus, Edouard Bard, Mélanie Baroni, Pascale Braconnot, Jian Cao, Louise P. Chini, Tania Egorova, Michael Evans, J. Fidel González-Rouco, Hugues Goosse, George C. Hurtt, Fortunat Joos, Jed O. Kaplan, Myriam Khodri, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Natalie Krivova, Allegra N. LeGrande, Stephan J. Lorenz, Jürg Luterbacher, Wenmin Man, Amanda C. Maycock, Malte Meinshausen, Anders Moberg, Raimund Muscheler, Christoph Nehrbass-Ahles, Bette I. Otto-Bliesner, Steven J. Phipps, Julia Pongratz, Eugene Rozanov, Gavin A. Schmidt, Hauke Schmidt, Werner Schmutz, Andrew Schurer, Alexander I. Shapiro, Michael Sigl, Jason E. Smerdon, Sami K. Solanki, Claudia Timmreck, Matthew Toohey, Ilya G. Usoskin, Sebastian Wagner, Chi-Ju Wu, Kok Leng Yeo, Davide Zanchettin, Qiong Zhang, and Eduardo Zorita
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4005-4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4005-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4005-2017, 2017
Short summary
A system of conservative regridding for ice–atmosphere coupling in a General Circulation Model (GCM)
R. Fischer, S. Nowicki, M. Kelley, and G. A. Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 883-907, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-883-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-883-2014, 2014
Related subject area  
Climate and Earth System Modeling
The Monash Simple Climate Model experiments (MSCM-DB v1.0): an interactive database of mean climate, climate change, and scenario simulations
Dietmar Dommenget, Kerry Nice, Tobias Bayr, Dieter Kasang, Christian Stassen, and Michael Rezny
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2155-2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2155-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2155-2019, 2019
Short summary
Evaluation of the WRF lake module (v1.0) and its improvements at a deep reservoir
Fushan Wang, Guangheng Ni, William J. Riley, Jinyun Tang, Dejun Zhu, and Ting Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2119-2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2119-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2119-2019, 2019
Short summary
Calculating the turbulent fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with neural networks
Lukas Hubert Leufen and Gerd Schädler
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2033-2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2033-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2033-2019, 2019
Short summary
BARRA v1.0: the Bureau of Meteorology Atmospheric high-resolution Regional Reanalysis for Australia
Chun-Hsu Su, Nathan Eizenberg, Peter Steinle, Dörte Jakob, Paul Fox-Hughes, Christopher J. White, Susan Rennie, Charmaine Franklin, Imtiaz Dharssi, and Hongyan Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2049-2068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2049-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2049-2019, 2019
Short summary
ATTILA 4.0: Lagrangian advective and convective transport of passive tracers within the ECHAM5/MESSy (2.53.0) chemistry–climate model
Sabine Brinkop and Patrick Jöckel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1991-2008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Alexander, M. and Dunkerton, T.: A spectral parameterization of mean-flow forcing due to breaking gravity waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 4167–4182, 1999.
Allan, R. P., Liu, C., Loeb, N. G., Palmer, M. D., Roberts, M., Smith, D., and Vidale, P.-L.: Changes in global net radiative imbalance 1985–2012, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5588–5597, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060962, 2014.
Annan, J. D. and Hargreaves, J. C.: On the meaning of independence in climate science, Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 211–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-211-2017, 2017.
Benedict, J., Maloney, E., Sobel, A., Frierson, D., and Donner, L.: Tropical intraseasonal variability in Version 3 of the GFDL atmosphere model, J. Climate, 26, 426–449, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00103.1, 2013.
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
The development of coupled ocean atmosphere climate models is a complex process that inevitably includes multiple calibration steps (sometimes called tuning). Tuning uses degrees of freedom allowed by uncertainties in model approximations to modify parameters to make the simulation better align with some selected observed target(s). We describe how these tuning targets, parameters, and philosophy vary across six US modeling centers in order to increase the transparency of the practice.
The development of coupled ocean atmosphere climate models is a complex process that inevitably...
Citation