Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 10, issue 9 | Copyright
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3591-3608, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3591-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 28 Sep 2017

Methods for assessment of models | 28 Sep 2017

Ellipsoids (v1.0): 3-D magnetic modelling of ellipsoidal bodies

Diego Takahashi and Vanderlei C. Oliveira Jr.
Related authors
Estimation of the total magnetization direction of approximately spherical bodies
V. C. Oliveira Jr., D. P. Sales, V. C. F. Barbosa, and L. Uieda
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 22, 215-232, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-215-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-215-2015, 2015
Related subject area
Solid Earth
Bayesian inference of earthquake rupture models using polynomial chaos expansion
Hugo Cruz-Jiménez, Guotu Li, Paul Martin Mai, Ibrahim Hoteit, and Omar M. Knio
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3071-3088, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3071-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3071-2018, 2018
Geodynamic diagnostics, scientific visualisation and StagLab 3.0
Fabio Crameri
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2541-2562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018, 2018
SaLEM (v1.0) – the Soil and Landscape Evolution Model (SaLEM) for simulation of regolith depth in periglacial environments
Michael Bock, Olaf Conrad, Andreas Günther, Ernst Gehrt, Rainer Baritz, and Jürgen Böhner
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1641-1652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1641-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1641-2018, 2018
SILLi 1.0: a 1-D numerical tool quantifying the thermal effects of sill intrusions
Karthik Iyer, Henrik Svensen, and Daniel W. Schmid
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 43-60, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-43-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-43-2018, 2018
The SPACE 1.0 model: a Landlab component for 2-D calculation of sediment transport, bedrock erosion, and landscape evolution
Charles M. Shobe, Gregory E. Tucker, and Katherine R. Barnhart
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4577-4604, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4577-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4577-2017, 2017
Cited articles
Allmendinger, R., Cardozo, N., and Fisher, D. M.: Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors and Tensors, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Austin, J., Geuna, S., Clark, D., and Hillan, D.: Remanence, self-demagnetization and their ramifications for magnetic modelling of iron oxide copper-gold deposits: An example from Candelaria, Chile, J. Appl. Geophys., 109, 242–255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.08.002, 2014.
Blakely, R. J.: Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Chang, H.: Fields external to open-structure magnetic devices represented by ellipsoid or spheroid, British Journal of Applied Physics, 12, 160–163, https://doi.org/10.1088/0508-3443/12/4/308, 1961.
Clark, D.: Self-Demagnetisation in Practice: the Osborne Cu-Au Deposit, Preview (Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists), 31–36, 2000.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Ellipsoids are the only bodies for which the self-demagnetization can be treated analytically. This property is useful for modelling compact orebodies having high susceptibility. We present a review of the magnetic modelling of ellipsoids, propose a way of determining the isotropic susceptibility above which the self-demagnetization must be considered, and discuss the ambiguity between confocal ellipsoids, as well as provide a set of routines to model the magnetic field produced by ellipsoids.
Ellipsoids are the only bodies for which the self-demagnetization can be treated analytically....
Citation
Share