Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
Development and technical paper
 | 
17 Nov 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 17 Nov 2017

Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling

Mikko Auvinen, Leena Järvi, Antti Hellsten, Üllar Rannik, and Timo Vesala

Related authors

Sensitivity analysis of the PALM model system 6.0 in the urban environment
Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Björn Maronga, Matthias Sühring, Mona Kurppa, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Vladimír Fuka, Kryštof Eben, Nina Benešová, and Mikko Auvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4443–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4443-2021, 2021
Short summary
A nested multi-scale system implemented in the large-eddy simulation model PALM model system 6.0
Antti Hellsten, Klaus Ketelsen, Matthias Sühring, Mikko Auvinen, Björn Maronga, Christoph Knigge, Fotios Barmpas, Georgios Tsegas, Nicolas Moussiopoulos, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3185–3214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Implementation of the sectional aerosol module SALSA2.0 into the PALM model system 6.0: model development and first evaluation
Mona Kurppa, Antti Hellsten, Pontus Roldin, Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Mikko Auvinen, Christoph Kent, Prashant Kumar, Björn Maronga, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1403–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019, 2019
Short summary
Sensitivity analysis of the meteorological preprocessor MPP-FMI 3.0 using algorithmic differentiation
John Backman, Curtis R. Wood, Mikko Auvinen, Leena Kangas, Hanna Hannuniemi, Ari Karppinen, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3793–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017, 2017
Short summary
EXTRACTING URBAN MORPHOLOGY FOR ATMOSPHERIC MODELING FROM MULTISPECTRAL AND SAR SATELLITE IMAGERY
S. Wittke, K. Karila, E. Puttonen, A. Hellsten, M. Auvinen, and M. Karjalainen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1-W1, 425–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-425-2017, 2017

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modelling wind farm effects in HARMONIE–AROME (cycle 43.2.2) – Part 1: Implementation and evaluation
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for dry and moist baroclinic waves in the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (CY43R3)
Clément Bouvier, Daan van den Broek, Madeleine Ekblom, and Victoria A. Sinclair
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2961–2986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Challenges of constructing and selecting the “perfect” boundary conditions for the large-eddy simulation model PALM
Jelena Radović, Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Kryštof Eben, Martin Bureš, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Hynek Řezníček, and Vladimír Fuka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2901–2927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024, 2024
Short summary
A machine learning approach for evaluating Southern Ocean cloud radiative biases in a global atmosphere model
Sonya L. Fiddes, Marc D. Mallet, Alain Protat, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Simon P. Alexander, and Kalli Furtado
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2641–2662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Decision Support System version 1.0 (DSS v1.0) for air quality management in Delhi, India
Gaurav Govardhan, Sachin D. Ghude, Rajesh Kumar, Sumit Sharma, Preeti Gunwani, Chinmay Jena, Prafull Yadav, Shubhangi Ingle, Sreyashi Debnath, Pooja Pawar, Prodip Acharja, Rajmal Jat, Gayatry Kalita, Rupal Ambulkar, Santosh Kulkarni, Akshara Kaginalkar, Vijay K. Soni, Ravi S. Nanjundiah, and Madhavan Rajeevan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2617–2640, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, W.: Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: Evidence from large-eddy simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 789, 567–588, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.744, 2016.
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy covariance. A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, 2012.
Christen, A., Coops, N., Crawford, B., Kellett, R., Liss, K., Olchovski, I., Tooke, T., van der Laan, M., and Voogt, J.: Validation of modeled carbon-dioxide emissions from an urban neighborhood with direct eddy-covariance measurements, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6057–6069, 2011.
Deardorff, J.: Stratoculumus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model, Bound-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, 1980.
Giometto, M., Christen, A., Meneveau, C., Fang, J., Krafczyk, M., and Parlange, M.: Spatial Characteristics of Roughness Sublayer Mean Flow and Turbulence Over a Realistic Urban Surface, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 160, 425–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6, 2016.
Download
Short summary
Correct spatial interpretation of a micrometeorological measurement requires the determination of its effective source area, or footprint. In urban areas the use of analytical models becomes highly questionable. This work introduces a computational methodology that enables the generation of footprints for complex urban sites. The methodology is based on conducting high-resolution flow and particle analysis on a model that features a detailed topographic description of a real city environment.