Journal cover
Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
EGU.eu
EGU Journals
EGU Highlight Articles
Contact
Imprint
About
Editorial board
Articles
Special issues
Highlight articles
Subscribe to alerts
Peer review
For authors
For editors and referees
User ID
Password
New user?
|
Lost login?
Follow
@EGU_GMD
Journal metrics
IF 3.458
IF 5-year
5.066
CiteScore
3.89
SNIP 1.172
SJR 2.855
IPP 3.510
h5-index 38
Abstracted/indexed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Current Contents/PCE
Scopus
ADS
Chemical Abstracts
CLOCKSS
CNKI
DOAJ
EBSCO
GBA
Gale/Cengage
GeoBase
GeoRef
GoOA (CAS)
Google Scholar
J-Gate
Portico
ProQuest
World Public Library
Volume 10, issue 12
Article
Assets
Peer review
Metrics
Related articles
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4743-4758, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4743-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Volume 10, issue 12
Article
Assets
Peer review
Metrics
Related articles
Development and technical paper
22 Dec 2017
A case study of aerosol data assimilation with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model over the contiguous United States using 3D-Var and optimal interpolation methods
Youhua Tang et al.
Related authors
Show only first author papers
Show all papers
Evaluating a fire smoke simulation algorithm in the National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) by using multiple observation data sets during the Southeast Nexus (SENEX) field campaign
(06 Nov 2017)
Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-207, in review, 2017
Multi-year downscaling application of two-way coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over east Asia for regional climate and air quality modeling: model evaluation and aerosol direct effects
(29 Jun 2017)
Chaopeng Hong, Qiang Zhang, Yang Zhang, Youhua Tang, Daniel Tong, and Kebin He
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2447-2470, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2447-2017, 2017
The implementation of NEMS GFS Aerosol Component (NGAC) Version 1.0 for global dust forecasting at NOAA/NCEP
(20 May 2016)
Cheng-Hsuan Lu, Arlindo da Silva, Jun Wang, Shrinivas Moorthi, Mian Chin, Peter Colarco, Youhua Tang, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Shen-Po Chen, Hui-Ya Chuang, Hann-Ming Henry Juang, Jeffery McQueen, and Mark Iredell
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1905-1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1905-2016, 2016
Toward enhanced capability for detecting and predicting dust events in the western United States: the Arizona case study
(12 Nov 2015)
M. Huang, D. Tong, P. Lee, L. Pan, Y. Tang, I. Stajner, R. B. Pierce, J. McQueen, and J. Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12595-12610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12595-2015, 2015
Evaluation of modeled surface ozone biases as a function of cloud cover fraction
(25 Sep 2015)
H. C. Kim, P. Lee, F. Ngan, Y. Tang, H. L. Yoo, and L. Pan
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2959-2965, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2959-2015, 2015
Ozone distributions over southern Lake Michigan: comparisons between ferry-based observations, shoreline-based DOAS observations and model forecasts
(06 May 2015)
P. A. Cleary, N. Fuhrman, L. Schulz, J. Schafer, J. Fillingham, H. Bootsma, J. McQueen, Y. Tang, T. Langel, S. McKeen, E. J. Williams, and S. S. Brown
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5109-5122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5109-2015, 2015
Evaluation of the United States National Air Quality Forecast Capability experimental real-time predictions in 2010 using Air Quality System ozone and NO
2
measurements
(29 Oct 2013)
T. Chai, H.-C. Kim, P. Lee, D. Tong, L. Pan, Y. Tang, J. Huang, J. McQueen, M. Tsidulko, and I. Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1831-1850, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013, 2013
More articles (2)
The implementation of NEMS GFS Aerosol Component (NGAC) Version 2.0 for global multispecies forecasting at NOAA/NCEP: Part I Model Descriptions
(22 Dec 2017)
Jun Wang, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Vijay Tallapragada, Cheng-Hsuan Lu, Shobha Kondragunta, Arlindo da Silva, Xiaoyang Zhang, Sheng-Po Chen, Shih-Wei Wei, Anton S. Darmenov, Jeff McQueen, Pius Lee, Prabhat Koner, and Andy Harris
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-306, in review, 2017
Evaluating a fire smoke simulation algorithm in the National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) by using multiple observation data sets during the Southeast Nexus (SENEX) field campaign
(06 Nov 2017)
Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-207, in review, 2017
Regional contributions to particulate matter concentration in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea: seasonal variation and sensitivity to meteorology and emissions inventory
(04 Sep 2017)
Hyun Cheol Kim, Eunhye Kim, Changhan Bae, Jeong Hoon Cho, Byeong-Uk Kim, and Soontae Kim
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10315-10332, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10315-2017, 2017
Biogenic isoprene emissions driven by regional weather predictions using different initialization methods: case studies during the SEAC
4
RS and DISCOVER-AQ airborne campaigns
(21 Aug 2017)
Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, James H. Crawford, Armin Wisthaler, Xiwu Zhan, Christopher R. Hain, Pius Lee, and Alex B. Guenther
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3085-3104, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3085-2017, 2017
Variations in surface ozone and carbon monoxide in the Kathmandu Valley and surrounding broader regions during SusKat-ABC field campaign: Role of local and regional sources
(17 Jul 2017)
Piyush Bhardwaj, Manish Naja, Maheswar Rupakheti, Arnico K. Panday, Rajesh Kumar, Khadak Mahata, Shyam Lal, Harish C. Chandola, and Mark G. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-306, in review, 2017
Multi-year downscaling application of two-way coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over east Asia for regional climate and air quality modeling: model evaluation and aerosol direct effects
(29 Jun 2017)
Chaopeng Hong, Qiang Zhang, Yang Zhang, Youhua Tang, Daniel Tong, and Kebin He
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2447-2470, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2447-2017, 2017
Improving volcanic ash predictions with the HYSPLIT dispersion model by assimilating MODIS satellite retrievals
(24 Feb 2017)
Tianfeng Chai, Alice Crawford, Barbara Stunder, Michael J. Pavolonis, Roland Draxler, and Ariel Stein
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2865-2879, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2865-2017, 2017
Synoptic perspectives on pollutant transport patterns observed by satellites over East Asia: Case studies with a conceptual model
(09 Sep 2016)
Hyun Cheol Kim, Soontae Kim, Seok-Woo Son, Pius Lee, Chun-Sil Jin, Eunhye Kim, Byeong-Uk Kim, Fong Ngan, Changhan Bae, Chang-Keun Song, and Ariel Stein
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-673, 2016
Model development of dust emission and heterogeneous chemistry within the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system and its application over East Asia
(06 Jul 2016)
Xinyi Dong, Joshua S. Fu, Kan Huang, Daniel Tong, and Guoshun Zhuang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8157-8180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8157-2016, 2016
The implementation of NEMS GFS Aerosol Component (NGAC) Version 1.0 for global dust forecasting at NOAA/NCEP
(20 May 2016)
Cheng-Hsuan Lu, Arlindo da Silva, Jun Wang, Shrinivas Moorthi, Mian Chin, Peter Colarco, Youhua Tang, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Shen-Po Chen, Hui-Ya Chuang, Hann-Ming Henry Juang, Jeffery McQueen, and Mark Iredell
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1905-1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1905-2016, 2016
OMI NO
2
column densities over North American urban cities: the effect of satellite footprint resolution
(22 Mar 2016)
Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Laura Judd, Li Pan, and Barry Lefer
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1111-1123, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1111-2016, 2016
The impact of observation nudging on simulated meteorology and ozone concentrations during DISCOVER-AQ 2013 Texas campaign
(09 Mar 2016)
Xiangshang Li, Yunsoo Choi, Beata Czader, Anirban Roy, Hyuncheol Kim, Barry Lefer, and Shuai Pan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3127-3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3127-2016, 2016
Toward enhanced capability for detecting and predicting dust events in the western United States: the Arizona case study
(12 Nov 2015)
M. Huang, D. Tong, P. Lee, L. Pan, Y. Tang, I. Stajner, R. B. Pierce, J. McQueen, and J. Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12595-12610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12595-2015, 2015
Evaluation of modeled surface ozone biases as a function of cloud cover fraction
(25 Sep 2015)
H. C. Kim, P. Lee, F. Ngan, Y. Tang, H. L. Yoo, and L. Pan
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2959-2965, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2959-2015, 2015
Sources of black carbon aerosols in South Asia and surrounding regions during the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, Gases and Radiation Budget (ICARB)
(19 May 2015)
R. Kumar, M. C. Barth, V. S. Nair, G. G. Pfister, S. Suresh Babu, S. K. Satheesh, K. Krishna Moorthy, G. R. Carmichael, Z. Lu, and D. G. Streets
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5415-5428, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5415-2015, 2015
Data assimilation in atmospheric chemistry models: current status and future prospects for coupled chemistry meteorology models
(18 May 2015)
M. Bocquet, H. Elbern, H. Eskes, M. Hirtl, R. Žabkar, G. R. Carmichael, J. Flemming, A. Inness, M. Pagowski, J. L. Pérez Camaño, P. E. Saide, R. San Jose, M. Sofiev, J. Vira, A. Baklanov, C. Carnevale, G. Grell, and C. Seigneur
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5325-5358, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5325-2015, 2015
Ozone distributions over southern Lake Michigan: comparisons between ferry-based observations, shoreline-based DOAS observations and model forecasts
(06 May 2015)
P. A. Cleary, N. Fuhrman, L. Schulz, J. Schafer, J. Fillingham, H. Bootsma, J. McQueen, Y. Tang, T. Langel, S. McKeen, E. J. Williams, and S. S. Brown
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5109-5122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5109-2015, 2015
Implementation of aerosol assimilation in Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (v. 3.2) and WRF-Chem (v. 3.4.1)
(13 Aug 2014)
M. Pagowski, Z. Liu, G. A. Grell, M. Hu, H.-C. Lin, and C. S. Schwartz
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1621-1627, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1621-2014, 2014
Effects of dust aerosols on tropospheric chemistry during a typical pre-monsoon season dust storm in northern India
(04 Jul 2014)
R. Kumar, M. C. Barth, S. Madronich, M. Naja, G. R. Carmichael, G. G. Pfister, C. Knote, G. P. Brasseur, N. Ojha, and T. Sarangi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6813-6834, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6813-2014, 2014
Comparison of the economic impact of different wind power forecast systems for producers
(19 May 2014)
S. Alessandrini, F. Davò, S. Sperati, M. Benini, and L. Delle Monache
Adv. Sci. Res., 11, 49-53, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-11-49-2014, 2014
WRF-Chem simulations of a typical pre-monsoon dust storm in northern India: influences on aerosol optical properties and radiation budget
(10 Mar 2014)
R. Kumar, M. C. Barth, G. G. Pfister, M. Naja, and G. P. Brasseur
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2431-2446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2431-2014, 2014
Evaluation of the United States National Air Quality Forecast Capability experimental real-time predictions in 2010 using Air Quality System ozone and NO
2
measurements
(29 Oct 2013)
T. Chai, H.-C. Kim, P. Lee, D. Tong, L. Pan, Y. Tang, J. Huang, J. McQueen, M. Tsidulko, and I. Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1831-1850, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013, 2013
Impacts of transported background pollutants on summertime western US air quality: model evaluation, sensitivity analysis and data assimilation
(14 Jan 2013)
M. Huang, G. R. Carmichael, T. Chai, R. B. Pierce, S. J. Oltmans, D. A. Jaffe, K. W. Bowman, A. Kaduwela, C. Cai, S. N. Spak, A. J. Weinheimer, L. G. Huey, and G. S. Diskin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 359-391, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-359-2013, 2013
More articles (18)
Related subject area
Atmospheric Sciences
Estimating criteria pollutant emissions using the California Regional Multisector Air Quality Emissions (CA-REMARQUE) model v1.0
(11 Apr 2018)
Christina B. Zapata, Chris Yang, Sonia Yeh, Joan Ogden, and Michael J. Kleeman
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1293-1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1293-2018, 2018
Polar boundary layer bromine explosion and ozone depletion events in the chemistry–climate model EMAC v2.52: implementation and evaluation of AirSnow algorithm
(28 Mar 2018)
Stefanie Falk and Björn-Martin Sinnhuber
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1115-1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1115-2018, 2018
Optimizing UV Index determination from broadband irradiances
(27 Mar 2018)
Keith A. Tereszchuk, Yves J. Rochon, Chris A. McLinden, and Paul A. Vaillancourt
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1093-1113, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1093-2018, 2018
Global high-resolution simulations of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide using CHASER V4.0
(16 Mar 2018)
Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Koji Ogochi, Kengo Sudo, and Masayuki Takigawa
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 959-988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-959-2018, 2018
Overview of experiment design and comparison of models participating in phase 1 of the SPARC Quasi-Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi)
(16 Mar 2018)
Neal Butchart, James A. Anstey, Kevin Hamilton, Scott Osprey, Charles McLandress, Andrew C. Bushell, Yoshio Kawatani, Young-Ha Kim, Francois Lott, John Scinocca, Timothy N. Stockdale, Martin Andrews, Omar Bellprat, Peter Braesicke, Chiara Cagnazzo, Chih-Chieh Chen, Hye-Yeong Chun, Mikhail Dobrynin, Rolando R. Garcia, Javier Garcia-Serrano, Lesley J. Gray, Laura Holt, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Hiroaki Naoe, Holger Pohlmann, Jadwiga H. Richter, Adam A. Scaife, Verena Schenzinger, Federico Serva, Stefan Versick, Shingo Watanabe, Kohei Yoshida, and Seiji Yukimoto
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1009-1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1009-2018, 2018
Isca, v1.0: a framework for the global modelling of the atmospheres of Earth and other planets at varying levels of complexity
(06 Mar 2018)
Geoffrey K. Vallis, Greg Colyer, Ruth Geen, Edwin Gerber, Martin Jucker, Penelope Maher, Alexander Paterson, Marianne Pietschnig, James Penn, and Stephen I. Thomson
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 843-859, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018, 2018
Radiative–convective equilibrium model intercomparison project
(02 Mar 2018)
Allison A. Wing, Kevin A. Reed, Masaki Satoh, Bjorn Stevens, Sandrine Bony, and Tomoki Ohno
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 793-813, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-793-2018, 2018
The Extrapolar SWIFT model (version 1.0): fast stratospheric ozone chemistry for global climate models
(01 Mar 2018)
Daniel Kreyling, Ingo Wohltmann, Ralph Lehmann, and Markus Rex
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 753-769, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-753-2018, 2018
The dynamical core of the Aeolus 1.0 statistical–dynamical atmosphere model: validation and parameter optimization
(22 Feb 2018)
Sonja Totz, Alexey V. Eliseev, Stefan Petri, Michael Flechsig, Levke Caesar, Vladimir Petoukhov, and Dim Coumou
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 665-679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-665-2018, 2018
Multi-scale modeling of urban air pollution: development and application of a Street-in-Grid model (v1.0) by coupling MUNICH (v1.0) and Polair3D (v1.8.1)
(15 Feb 2018)
Youngseob Kim, You Wu, Christian Seigneur, and Yelva Roustan
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 611-629, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-611-2018, 2018
BEATBOX v1.0: Background Error Analysis Testbed with Box Models
(08 Feb 2018)
Christoph Knote, Jérôme Barré, and Max Eckl
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 561-573, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-561-2018, 2018
Parametric decadal climate forecast recalibration (DeFoReSt 1.0)
(25 Jan 2018)
Alexander Pasternack, Jonas Bhend, Mark A. Liniger, Henning W. Rust, Wolfgang A. Müller, and Uwe Ulbrich
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 351-368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-351-2018, 2018
Errors and improvements in the use of archived meteorological data for chemical transport modeling: an analysis using GEOS-Chem v11-01 driven by GEOS-5 meteorology
(23 Jan 2018)
Karen Yu, Christoph A. Keller, Daniel J. Jacob, Andrea M. Molod, Sebastian D. Eastham, and Michael S. Long
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 305-319, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-305-2018, 2018
The ALADIN System and its canonical model configurations AROME CY41T1 and ALARO CY40T1
(18 Jan 2018)
Piet Termonia, Claude Fischer, Eric Bazile, François Bouyssel, Radmila Brožková, Pierre Bénard, Bogdan Bochenek, Daan Degrauwe, Mariá Derková, Ryad El Khatib, Rafiq Hamdi, Ján Mašek, Patricia Pottier, Neva Pristov, Yann Seity, Petra Smolíková, Oldřich Španiel, Martina Tudor, Yong Wang, Christoph Wittmann, and Alain Joly
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 257-281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-257-2018, 2018
Development of an inorganic and organic aerosol model (CHIMERE 2017
β
v1.0): seasonal and spatial evaluation over Europe
(15 Jan 2018)
Florian Couvidat, Bertrand Bessagnet, Marta Garcia-Vivanco, Elsa Real, Laurent Menut, and Augustin Colette
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 165-194, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-165-2018, 2018
Lagrangian condensation microphysics with Twomey CCN activation
(12 Jan 2018)
Wojciech W. Grabowski, Piotr Dziekan, and Hanna Pawlowska
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 103-120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-103-2018, 2018
Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of an atmospheric chemistry transport model: the FRAME model (v. 9.15.0) as a case study
(12 Jan 2018)
Ksenia Aleksankina, Mathew R. Heal, Anthony J. Dore, Marcel Van Oijen, and Stefan Reis
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-302, in review, 2018
The UKC2 regional coupled environmental prediction system
(03 Jan 2018)
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Jennifer Graham, Andrew Saulter, Jorge Bornemann, Alex Arnold, Joachim Fallmann, Chris Harris, David Pearson, Steven Ramsdale, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, Lucy Bricheno, Eleanor Blyth, Victoria A. Bell, Helen Davies, Toby R. Marthews, Clare O'Neill, Heather Rumbold, Enda O'Dea, Ashley Brereton, Karen Guihou, Adrian Hines, Momme Butenschon, Simon J. Dadson, Tamzin Palmer, Jason Holt, Nick Reynard, Martin Best, John Edwards, and John Siddorn
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1-2018, 2018
Source–receptor matrix calculation for deposited mass with the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART v10.2 in backward mode
(18 Dec 2017)
Sabine Eckhardt, Massimo Cassiani, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Espen Sollum, Ignacio Pisso, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4605-4618, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4605-2017, 2017
The
ABC model
: a non-hydrostatic toy model for use in convective-scale data assimilation investigations
(05 Dec 2017)
Ruth Elizabeth Petrie, Ross Noel Bannister, and Michael John Priestley Cullen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4419-4441, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4419-2017, 2017
Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes
(24 Nov 2017)
Alain Clappier, Claudio A. Belis, Denise Pernigotti, and Philippe Thunis
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4245-4256, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017, 2017
Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data
(23 Nov 2017)
Joseph C. Y. Lee and Julie K. Lundquist
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4229-4244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017, 2017
Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling
(17 Nov 2017)
Mikko Auvinen, Leena Järvi, Antti Hellsten, Üllar Rannik, and Timo Vesala
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4187-4205, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017, 2017
Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model
(16 Nov 2017)
Astrid M. M. Manders, Peter J. H. Builtjes, Lyana Curier, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Carlijn Hendriks, Sander Jonkers, Richard Kranenburg, Jeroen J. P. Kuenen, Arjo J. Segers, Renske M. A. Timmermans, Antoon J. H. Visschedijk, Roy J. Wichink Kruit, W. Addo J. van Pul, Ferd J. Sauter, Eric van der Swaluw, Daan P. J. Swart, John Douros, Henk Eskes, Erik van Meijgaard, Bert van Ulft, Peter van Velthoven, Sabine Banzhaf, Andrea C. Mues, Rainer Stern, Guangliang Fu, Sha Lu, Arnold Heemink, Nils van Velzen, and Martijn Schaap
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4145-4173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4145-2017, 2017
Improved method for linear carbon monoxide simulation and source attribution in atmospheric chemistry models illustrated using GEOS-Chem v9
(15 Nov 2017)
Jenny A. Fisher, Lee T. Murray, Dylan B. A. Jones, and Nicholas M. Deutscher
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4129-4144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4129-2017, 2017
On the Effect of Model Parameters on Forecast Objects
(13 Nov 2017)
Caren Marzban, Corinne Jones, Ning Li, and Scott Sandgathe
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-273, in review, 2017
A single-column particle-resolved model for simulating the vertical distribution of aerosol mixing state: WRF-PartMC-MOSAIC-SCM v1.0
(09 Nov 2017)
Jeffrey H. Curtis, Nicole Riemer, and Matthew West
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4057-4079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4057-2017, 2017
The Palaeoclimate and Terrestrial Exoplanet Radiative Transfer Model Intercomparison Project (PALAEOTRIP): experimental design and protocols
(01 Nov 2017)
Colin Goldblatt, Lucas Kavanagh, and Maura Dewey
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3931-3940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3931-2017, 2017
A description and evaluation of an air quality model nested within global and regional composition-climate models using MetUM
(01 Nov 2017)
Lucy S. Neal, Mohit Dalvi, Gerd Folberth, Rachel N. McInnes, Paul Agnew, Fiona M. O'Connor, Nicholas H. Savage, and Marie Tilbee
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3941-3962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3941-2017, 2017
Evaluation of five dry particle deposition parameterizations for incorporation into atmospheric transport models
(25 Oct 2017)
Tanvir R. Khan and Judith A. Perlinger
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3861-3888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3861-2017, 2017
Sensitivity analysis of the meteorological preprocessor MPP-FMI 3.0 using algorithmic differentiation
(17 Oct 2017)
John Backman, Curtis R. Wood, Mikko Auvinen, Leena Kangas, Hanna Hannuniemi, Ari Karppinen, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3793-3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3793-2017, 2017
ARTS, the atmospheric radiative transfer simulator – version 2.2, the planetary toolbox edition
(11 Oct 2017)
Stefan A. Buehler, Jana Mendrok, Patrick Eriksson, Agnès Perrin, Richard Larsson, and Oliver Lemke
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-229, in review, 2017
Atmospheric inverse modeling via sparse reconstruction
(10 Oct 2017)
Nils Hase, Scot M. Miller, Peter Maaß, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, and Thorsten Warneke
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3695-3713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3695-2017, 2017
PALM-USM v1.0: A new urban surface model integrated into the PALM large-eddy simulation model
(09 Oct 2017)
Jaroslav Resler, Pavel Krč, Michal Belda, Pavel Juruš, Nina Benešová, Jan Lopata, Ondřej Vlček, Daša Damašková, Kryštof Eben, Přemysl Derbek, Björn Maronga, and Farah Kanani-Sühring
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3635-3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3635-2017, 2017
Improvements to the WRF-Chem 3.5.1 model for quasi-hemispheric simulations of aerosols and ozone in the Arctic
(09 Oct 2017)
Louis Marelle, Jean-Christophe Raut, Kathy S. Law, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Richard C. Easter, Manish Shrivastava, and Jennie L. Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3661-3677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3661-2017, 2017
Analysis of errors introduced by geographic coordinate systems on weather numeric prediction modeling
(19 Sep 2017)
Yanni Cao, Guido Cervone, Zachary Barkley, Thomas Lauvaux, Aijun Deng, and Alan Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3425-3440, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3425-2017, 2017
Evaluation of high-resolution GRAMM–GRAL (v15.12/v14.8) NO
x
simulations over the city of Zürich, Switzerland
(19 Sep 2017)
Antoine Berchet, Katrin Zink, Dietmar Oettl, Jürg Brunner, Lukas Emmenegger, and Dominik Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3441-3459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3441-2017, 2017
Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015)
(11 Sep 2017)
Margreet J. E. van Marle, Silvia Kloster, Brian I. Magi, Jennifer R. Marlon, Anne-Laure Daniau, Robert D. Field, Almut Arneth, Matthew Forrest, Stijn Hantson, Natalie M. Kehrwald, Wolfgang Knorr, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, Stéphane Mangeon, Chao Yue, Johannes W. Kaiser, and Guido R. van der Werf
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3329-3357, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017, 2017
EURODELTA-Trends, a multi-model experiment of air quality hindcast in Europe over 1990–2010
(05 Sep 2017)
Augustin Colette, Camilla Andersson, Astrid Manders, Kathleen Mar, Mihaela Mircea, Maria-Teresa Pay, Valentin Raffort, Svetlana Tsyro, Cornelius Cuvelier, Mario Adani, Bertrand Bessagnet, Robert Bergström, Gino Briganti, Tim Butler, Andrea Cappelletti, Florian Couvidat, Massimo D'Isidoro, Thierno Doumbia, Hilde Fagerli, Claire Granier, Chris Heyes, Zig Klimont, Narendra Ojha, Noelia Otero, Martijn Schaap, Katarina Sindelarova, Annemiek I. Stegehuis, Yelva Roustan, Robert Vautard, Erik van Meijgaard, Marta Garcia Vivanco, and Peter Wind
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3255-3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3255-2017, 2017
JRAero: the Japanese Reanalysis for Aerosol v1.0
(04 Sep 2017)
Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Y. Tanaka, Naga Oshima, and Takashi Maki
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3225-3253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3225-2017, 2017
eddy4R 0.2.0: a DevOps model for community-extensible processing and analysis of eddy-covariance data based on R, Git, Docker, and HDF5
(31 Aug 2017)
Stefan Metzger, David Durden, Cove Sturtevant, Hongyan Luo, Natchaya Pingintha-Durden, Torsten Sachs, Andrei Serafimovich, Jörg Hartmann, Jiahong Li, Ke Xu, and Ankur R. Desai
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3189-3206, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3189-2017, 2017
MicroHH 1.0: a computational fluid dynamics code for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flows
(28 Aug 2017)
Chiel C. van Heerwaarden, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Thijs Heus, Jeremy A. Gibbs, Evgeni Fedorovich, and Juan Pedro Mellado
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3145-3165, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3145-2017, 2017
Biogenic isoprene emissions driven by regional weather predictions using different initialization methods: case studies during the SEAC
4
RS and DISCOVER-AQ airborne campaigns
(21 Aug 2017)
Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, James H. Crawford, Armin Wisthaler, Xiwu Zhan, Christopher R. Hain, Pius Lee, and Alex B. Guenther
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3085-3104, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3085-2017, 2017
The TOMCAT global chemical transport model v1.6: description of chemical mechanism and model evaluation
(17 Aug 2017)
Sarah A. Monks, Stephen R. Arnold, Michael J. Hollaway, Richard J. Pope, Chris Wilson, Wuhu Feng, Kathryn M. Emmerson, Brian J. Kerridge, Barry L. Latter, Georgina M. Miles, Richard Siddans, and Martyn P. Chipperfield
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3025-3057, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3025-2017, 2017
Prognostic parameterization of cloud ice with a single category in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM(v6.3.0)-HAM(v2.3)
(14 Aug 2017)
Remo Dietlicher, David Neubauer, and Ulrike Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-164, in review, 2017
Enviro-HIRLAM online integrated meteorology–chemistry modelling system: strategy, methodology, developments and applications (v7.2)
(08 Aug 2017)
Alexander Baklanov, Ulrik Smith Korsholm, Roman Nuterman, Alexander Mahura, Kristian Pagh Nielsen, Bent Hansen Sass, Alix Rasmussen, Ashraf Zakey, Eigil Kaas, Alexander Kurganskiy, Brian Sørensen, and Iratxe González-Aparicio
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2971-2999, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2971-2017, 2017
Sensitivity of the WRF-Chem (V3.6.1) model to different dust emission parametrisation: assessment in the broader Mediterranean region
(04 Aug 2017)
Emmanouil Flaounas, Vassiliki Kotroni, Konstantinos Lagouvardos, Martina Klose, Cyrille Flamant, and Theodore M. Giannaros
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2925-2945, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2925-2017, 2017
GNAQPMS v1.1: accelerating the Global Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (GNAQPMS) on Intel Xeon Phi processors
(01 Aug 2017)
Hui Wang, Huansheng Chen, Qizhong Wu, Junmin Lin, Xueshun Chen, Xinwei Xie, Rongrong Wang, Xiao Tang, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2891-2904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2891-2017, 2017
REDCAPP (v1.0): parameterizing valley inversions in air temperature data downscaled from reanalyses
(01 Aug 2017)
Bin Cao, Stephan Gruber, and Tingjun Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2905-2923, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2905-2017, 2017
The Analytical Objective Hysteresis Model (AnOHM v1.0): methodology to determine bulk storage heat flux coefficients
(27 Jul 2017)
Ting Sun, Zhi-Hua Wang, Walter C. Oechel, and Sue Grimmond
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2875-2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2875-2017, 2017
More articles (45)
Cited articles
Adhikary, B., Kulkarni, S., Dallura, A., Tang, Y., Chai, T., Leung, L. R., Qian, Y., Chung, C. E., Ramanathan, V., and Carmichael, G. R.
: A regional scale chemical transport modeling of Asian aerosols with data assimilation of AOD observations using optimal interpolation technique, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8600–8615, 2008.
Appel, K. W., Roselle, S. J., Gilliam, R. C., and Pleim, J. E.
: Sensitivity of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v4.7 results for the eastern United States to MM5 and WRF meteorological drivers, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 169–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-169-2010, 2010.
Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.
: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component: 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4183, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409, 2003.
Bocquet, M., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Hirtl, M., Žabkar, R., Carmichael, G. R., Flemming, J., Inness, A., Pagowski, M., Pérez Camaño, J. L., Saide, P. E., San Jose, R., Sofiev, M., Vira, J., Baklanov, A., Carnevale, C., Grell, G., and Seigneur, C.
: Data assimilation in atmospheric chemistry models: current status and future prospects for coupled chemistry meteorology models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5325–5358, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5325-2015, 2015.
Chai, T., Carmichael, G. R., Sandu, A., Tang, Y., and Daescu, D. N.
: Chemical data assimilation of Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) aircraft measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D02301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005883, 2006.
Chai, T., Kim, H. C., Pan, L., Lee, P., and Tong, D.
: Impact of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and AirNow PM
2.5
assimilation on Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) aerosol predictions over the contiguous United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 5399–5415, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026295, 2017.
Chin, M., Rood, R. B., Lin, S.-J., Muller, J.-F., and Thompson, A. M.
: Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24671–24687, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900384, 2000.
Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., and Higurashi, A.
: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and Sun photometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, 2002.
Descombes, G., Auligné, T., Vandenberghe, F., Barker, D. M., and Barré, J.
: Generalized background error covariance matrix model (GEN_BE v2.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 669–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-669-2015, 2015.
Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.
: A 4D-Var chemistry data assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modelling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 18583–18598, 1999.
Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.
: Ozone episode analysis by four dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 3569–3590, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900448, 2001.
Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., and Ebel, A.
: Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modelling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 15967–15985, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01213, 1997.
Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., Talagrand, O., and Ebel, A.
: 4D-variational data assimilation with an adjoint air quality model for emission analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 539–548, 2000.
Elbern, H., Strunk, A., Schmidt, H., and Talagrand, O.
: Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749–3769, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007, 2007.
Han, Y., van Delst, P., Liu, Q., Weng, F., Yan, B., Treadon, R., and Derber, J.
: JCSDA Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) – Version 1, NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 122, 33 pp., NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 2006.
Jiang, W., Smyth, S., Giroux, E., Roth, H., and Yin, D.
: Differences between CMAQ fine mode particle and PM
2.5
concentrations and their impact on model performance evaluation in the lower Fraser valley, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4973–4985, 2006.
Lee, P., McQueen, J., Stajner, I., Huang, J., Pan, L., Tong, D., Kim, H., Tang, Y., Kondragunta, S., Ruminski, M., and Lu, S.
: NAQFC developmental forecast guidance for fine particulate matter (PM
2.5
), Weather Forecast., 32, 343–360, 2017.
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., and Kaufman, Y. J.
: Algorithm for remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over dark targetsfrom MODIS: Collections 005 and 051, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, available at: https://modis-images.gsfc.nasa.gov/_docs/ATBD_MOD04_C005_rev2.pdf (last access: 20 December 2017), revision2, 2009.
Liu, J., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Kathmann, S. M., Wise, M., Caylor, R., Imholt, F., Selimovic, V., and Shilling, J. E.
: Optical properties and aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12815–12827, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016, 2016.
Liu, Q. and Weng, F.
: Advanced doubling-adding method for radiative transfer in planetary atmospheres, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3459–3465, 2006.
Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Lin, H.-C., Schwartz, C. S., Lee, Y.-H., and Wang, T.
: Three-dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth: implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D22306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016159, 2011.
Lu, C.-H., da Silva, A., Wang, J., Moorthi, S., Chin, M., Colarco, P., Tang, Y., Bhattacharjee, P. S., Chen, S.-P., Chuang, H.-Y., Juang, H.-M. H., McQueen, J., and Iredell, M.
: The implementation of NEMS GFS Aerosol Component (NGAC) Version 1.0 for global dust forecasting at NOAA/NCEP, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1905–1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1905-2016, 2016.
Malm, W. C., J. F. Sisler, D. Huffman, R. A. Eldred, and Cahill, T. A.
: Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, 1994.
Pagowski, M., Liu, Z., Grell, G. A., Hu, M., Lin, H.-C., and Schwartz, C. S.
: Implementation of aerosol assimilation in Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (v. 3.2) and WRF-Chem (v. 3.4.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1621–1627, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1621-2014, 2014.
Pan, L., Tong, D. Q., Lee, P., Kim, H., and Chai, T.
: Assessment of NO
x
and O
3
forecasting performances in the US National Air Quality Forecasting Capability before and after the 2012 major emissions updates, Atmos. Environ., 95, 610–619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.020, 2014.
Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C.
: The National Meteorological Center spectral statistical interpolation analysis system, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747–1763, 1992.
Purser, R. J., Wu, W.-S., Parrish, A. F., and Roberts, N. M.
: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatially homogeneous Gaussian covariances, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1524–1535, 2003a.
Purser, R. J., Wu, W.-S., Parrish, A. F., and Roberts, N. M.
: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part II: Spatially inhomogeneous and anisotropic general covariances, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1536–1549, 2003b.
Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins, J. V., Li, R. R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., and Eck, T. F.
: The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, 2005.
Roy, B., Mathur, R., Gilliland, A. B., and Howard, S. C.
: A comparison of CMAQ-based aerosol properties with IMPROVE, MODIS, and AERONET data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D14301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008085, 2007.
Sonntag, D. B., Baldauf, R. W., Yanca, C. A., and Fulper, C. R.
: Particulate matter speciation profiles for light-duty gasoline vehicles in the United States, J. Air Waste Manage., 64, 529–545, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.870096, 2014.
Tang, Y., Lee, P., Tsidulko, M., Huang, H.-C., McQueen, J. T., DiMego, G. J., Emmons, L. K., Pierce, R. B., Thompson, A. M., Lin, H.-M., Kang, D., Tong, D., Yu, S.-C., Mathur, R., Pleim, J. E., Otte, T. L., Pouliot, G., Young, J. O., Schere, K. L., Davidson, P. M., and Stajner, I.
: The Impact of chemical lateral boundary conditions on CMAQ predictions of tropospheric ozone over the Continental United States, Environ. Fluid Mech., 9, 43–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9092-5, 2008.
Tang, Y., Chai, T., Pan, L., Lee, P., Tong, D., Kim, H., and Chen, W.
: Using optimal interpolation to assimilate surface measurements and satellite AOD for ozone and PM
2.5
: a case study for July 2011, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1062439, 2015.
Whitby, E. R. and McMurry, P. H.
: Modal aerosol dynamics modeling, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 27, 673–688, 1997.
Wu, W.-S., Purser, R. J., and Parrish, D. F.
: Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 2905–2916, 2002.
More articles (30)
Search articles
Author
Title
Abstract
Full text
Download
Short summary
In order to evaluate the data assimilation tools for regional real-time PM
2.5
forecasts, we applied a 3D-Var assimilation tool to adjust the aerosol initial condition by assimilating satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth and surface PM
2.5
observations for a regional air quality model, which is compared to another assimilation method, optimal interpolation. We discuss the pros and cons of these two assimilation methods based on the comparison of their 1-month four-cycles-per-day runs.
In order to evaluate the data assimilation tools for regional real-time PM
2.5
forecasts, we...
Read more
Citation
BibTeX
EndNote
Share