Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 11, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1133–1160, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1133–1160, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model experiment description paper 29 Mar 2018

Model experiment description paper | 29 Mar 2018

The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6

David P. Keller et al.
Related authors  
Meeting climate targets by direct CO2 injections: what price would the ocean have to pay?
Fabian Reith, Wolfgang Koeve, David P. Keller, Julia Getzlaff, and Andreas Oschlies
Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 711–727, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-711-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-711-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessing carbon dioxide removal through global and regional ocean alkalinization under high and low emission pathways
Andrew Lenton, Richard J. Matear, David P. Keller, Vivian Scott, and Naomi E. Vaughan
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 339–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-339-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-339-2018, 2018
Short summary
Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) – a bottom–up, science-led approach to identifying indicators
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, and Andreas Oschlies
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-15-2018, 2018
Short summary
Revisiting ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection: a global carbon budget perspective
Fabian Reith, David P. Keller, and Andreas Oschlies
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 797–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-797-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-797-2016, 2016
A dynamic marine iron cycle module coupled to the University of Victoria Earth System Model: the Kiel Marine Biogeochemical Model 2 for UVic 2.9
L. Nickelsen, D. P. Keller, and A. Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1357–1381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1357-2015, 2015
Short summary
Related subject area  
Climate and Earth System Modeling
Update and evaluation of the ozone dry deposition in Oslo CTM3 v1.0
Stefanie Falk and Amund Søvde Haslerud
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4705–4728, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4705-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4705-2019, 2019
Short summary
GlobSim (v1.0): deriving meteorological time series for point locations from multiple global reanalyses
Bin Cao, Xiaojing Quan, Nicholas Brown, Emilie Stewart-Jones, and Stephan Gruber
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4661–4679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4661-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4661-2019, 2019
Short summary
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
Zhiqiang Li, Yulun Zhou, Bingcheng Wan, Hopun Chung, Bo Huang, and Biao Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4571–4584, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019, 2019
Short summary
Developing and optimizing shrub parameters representing sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems in the northern Great Basin using the Ecosystem Demography (EDv2.2) model
Karun Pandit, Hamid Dashti, Nancy F. Glenn, Alejandro N. Flores, Kaitlin C. Maguire, Douglas J. Shinneman, Gerald N. Flerchinger, and Aaron W. Fellows
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4585–4601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4585-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4585-2019, 2019
Short summary
Description and evaluation of the Diat-HadOCC model v1.0: the ocean biogeochemical component of HadGEM2-ES
Ian J. Totterdell
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4497–4549, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4497-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4497-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Lowe, J. A., Meinshausen, M., and Meinshausen, N.: Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne, Nature, 458, 1163–1166, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08019, 2009.
Armour, K. C., Eisenman, I., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., McCusker, K. E., and Bitz, C. M.: The reversibility of sea ice loss in a state-of-the-art climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048739, 2011.
Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: Terrestrial ecosystems response to future changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 concentration, Biogeosciences, 11, 4157–4171, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4157-2014, 2014.
Betts, R. A.: Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo, Nature, 409, 187–190, 2000.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
There is little consensus on the impacts and efficacy of proposed carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods as a potential means of mitigating climate change. To address this need, the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (or CDR-MIP) has been initiated. This project brings together models of the Earth system in a common framework to explore the potential, impacts, and challenges of CDR. Here, we describe the first set of CDR-MIP experiments.
There is little consensus on the impacts and efficacy of proposed carbon dioxide removal (CDR)...
Citation