Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2455–2474, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2455-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2455–2474, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2455-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 20 Jun 2018

Methods for assessment of models | 20 Jun 2018

Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): project goals and experimental design

Christine A. Shields et al.
Related authors  
Permian Megamonsoon Sensitivity to Paleo-Tethys Warm Pool: Model Simulations using CCSM3
Christine A. Shields and Jeffrey T. Kiehl
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2017-42,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2017-42, 2017
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
The DeepMIP contribution to PMIP4: experimental design for model simulations of the EECO, PETM, and pre-PETM (version 1.0)
Daniel J. Lunt, Matthew Huber, Eleni Anagnostou, Michiel L. J. Baatsen, Rodrigo Caballero, Rob DeConto, Henk A. Dijkstra, Yannick Donnadieu, David Evans, Ran Feng, Gavin L. Foster, Ed Gasson, Anna S. von der Heydt, Chris J. Hollis, Gordon N. Inglis, Stephen M. Jones, Jeff Kiehl, Sandy Kirtland Turner, Robert L. Korty, Reinhardt Kozdon, Srinath Krishnan, Jean-Baptiste Ladant, Petra Langebroek, Caroline H. Lear, Allegra N. LeGrande, Kate Littler, Paul Markwick, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Paul Pearson, Christopher J. Poulsen, Ulrich Salzmann, Christine Shields, Kathryn Snell, Michael Stärz, James Super, Clay Tabor, Jessica E. Tierney, Gregory J. L. Tourte, Aradhna Tripati, Garland R. Upchurch, Bridget S. Wade, Scott L. Wing, Arne M. E. Winguth, Nicky M. Wright, James C. Zachos, and Richard E. Zeebe
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 889–901, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-889-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-889-2017, 2017
Short summary
Related subject area  
Atmospheric Sciences
The upper-atmosphere extension of the ICON general circulation model (version: ua-icon-1.0)
Sebastian Borchert, Guidi Zhou, Michael Baldauf, Hauke Schmidt, Günther Zängl, and Daniel Reinert
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3541–3569, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019, 2019
Short summary
Revised treatment of wet scavenging processes dramatically improves GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 simulations of surface nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium over the United States
Gan Luo, Fangqun Yu, and James Schwab
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3439–3447, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessment of wavelet-based spatial verification by means of a stochastic precipitation model (wv_verif v0.1.0)
Sebastian Buschow, Jakiw Pidstrigach, and Petra Friederichs
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3401–3418, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019, 2019
Short summary
The Eulerian urban dispersion model EPISODE – Part 2: Extensions to the source dispersion and photochemistry for EPISODE–CityChem v1.2 and its application to the city of Hamburg
Matthias Karl, Sam-Erik Walker, Sverre Solberg, and Martin O. P. Ramacher
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3357–3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3357-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3357-2019, 2019
Short summary
The FireWork v2.0 air quality forecast system with biomass burning emissions from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System v2.03
Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Radenko Pavlovic, Michael D. Moran, Peter Englefield, Dan K. Thompson, Rodrigo Munoz-Alpizar, and Hugo Landry
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3283–3310, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
American Meteorological Society: Atmospheric River, Glossary of Meteorology, available at: http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/atmospheric river (last access: 15 June 2018), 2017. 
Baggett, C. F., Barnes, E. A., Maloney, E. D., and Mundhenk, B. D.: Advancing atmospheric river forecasts into subseasonal-to-seasonal time scales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 7528–7536, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074434, 2017. 
Barnes, E. A. and Polvani, L.: Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 26, 7117–7135, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00536.1, 2013. 
Bonne, J., Steen-Larsen, H. C., Risi, C., Werner, M., Sodemann, H., Lacour, J. Fettweis, X., Cesana, G., Delmotte, M., Cattani, O., Vallelonga, P., Kjær, H. A., Clerbaux, C., Sveinbjörnsdóttir, A. E., and Masson-Delmotte, V.: The summer 2012 Greenland heat wave: In situ and remote sensing observations of water vapor isotopic composition during an atmospheric river event, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2970–2989, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022602, 2015. 
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
ARTMIP (Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project) is a community effort with the explicit goal of understanding the uncertainties, and the implications of those uncertainties, in atmospheric river science solely due to detection algorithm. ARTMIP strives to quantify these differences and provide guidance on appropriate algorithmic choices for the science question posed. Project goals, experimental design, and preliminary results are provided.
ARTMIP (Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project) is a community effort with...
Citation