Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
| 
03 Aug 2018
Model experiment description paper |
| 03 Aug 2018
| 03 Aug 2018
Age of air as a diagnostic for transport timescales in global models
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the
Netherlands
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht
University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Netherlands Institute for
Space Research SRON, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Marco de Bruine
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht
University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Lars Killaars
Faculty of Science
and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Huug Ouwersloot
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Andrea Pozzer
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Yi Yin
Laboraroire de Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE),
Gif-sur-Yvette, France
now at: Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA
Frederic Chevallier
Laboraroire de Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE),
Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Philippe Bousquet
Laboraroire de Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE),
Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Prabir Patra
Japan Agency for
Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama City, Japan
Dmitry Belikov
Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Shamil Maksyutov
Center for
Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Sandip Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment,
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Wuhu Feng
National Centre for Atmospheric
Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Martyn P. Chipperfield
School of Earth and Environment,
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric
Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 4,908 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Nov 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,200 | 1,573 | 135 | 4,908 | 141 | 136 |
- HTML: 3,200
- PDF: 1,573
- XML: 135
- Total: 4,908
- BibTeX: 141
- EndNote: 136
Total article views: 3,945 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Aug 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,691 | 1,146 | 108 | 3,945 | 123 | 109 |
- HTML: 2,691
- PDF: 1,146
- XML: 108
- Total: 3,945
- BibTeX: 123
- EndNote: 109
Total article views: 963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Nov 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 509 | 427 | 27 | 963 | 18 | 27 |
- HTML: 509
- PDF: 427
- XML: 27
- Total: 963
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,908 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,518 with geography defined
and 390 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,945 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,588 with geography defined
and 357 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 930 with geography defined
and 33 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
42 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Extratropical age of air trends and causative factors in climate projection simulations P. Šácha et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7627-2019
- Influence of Atmospheric Transport on Estimates of Variability in the Global Methane Burden S. Pandey et al. 10.1029/2018GL081092
- A top-down estimation of subnational CO2 budget using a global high-resolution inverse model with data from regional surface networks L. Nayagam et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f74
- Country-level methane emissions and their sectoral trends during 2009–2020 estimated by high-resolution inversion of GOSAT and surface observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2436
- Global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inverse models converging on neutral tropical land exchange, but disagreeing on fossil fuel and atmospheric growth rate B. Gaubert et al. 10.5194/bg-16-117-2019
- The increasing atmospheric burden of the greenhouse gas sulfur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) P. Simmonds et al. 10.5194/acp-20-7271-2020
- Asymmetry and pathways of inter-hemispheric transport in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere X. Yan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021
- Opinion: Tropical cirrus – from micro-scale processes to climate-scale impacts B. Gasparini et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15413-2023
- Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH S. Naus et al. 10.5194/acp-19-407-2019
- Simulating age of air and the distribution of SF<sub>6</sub> in the stratosphere with the SILAM model R. Kouznetsov et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5837-2020
- Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years J. Xiao et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111383
- Determination of the chemical equator from GEOS-Chem model simulation: a focus on the tropical western Pacific region X. Sun et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023
- ENSO-driven reverse coupling in interannual variability of pantropical water availability and global atmospheric CO2 growth rate A. Zhang & G. Jia 10.1088/1748-9326/ab66cc
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Upper tropospheric CH<sub>4</sub> and CO affected by the South Asian summer monsoon during the Oxidation Mechanism Observations mission L. Tomsche et al. 10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019
- National CO2budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Model simulations of atmospheric methane (1997–2016) and their evaluation using NOAA and AGAGE surface and IAGOS-CARIBIC aircraft observations P. Zimmermann et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5787-2020
- Seasonal Variations of SF6, CO2, CH4, and N2O in the UT/LS Region due to Emissions, Transport, and Chemistry J. Bisht et al. 10.1029/2020JD033541
- A three-dimensional-model inversion of methyl chloroform to constrain the atmospheric oxidative capacity S. Naus et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4809-2021
- Comparison of mean age of air in five reanalyses using the BASCOE transport model S. Chabrillat et al. 10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- Reducing errors on estimates of the carbon uptake period based on time series of atmospheric CO2 T. Kariyathan et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3299-2023
- Gravitational separation of Ar∕N<sub>2</sub> and age of air in the lowermost stratosphere in airborne observations and a chemical transport model B. Birner et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12391-2020
- Investigating the differences in calculating global mean surface CO2 abundance: the impact of analysis methodologies and site selection Z. Wu et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1249-2024
- Three-dimensional simulation of stratospheric gravitational separation using the NIES global atmospheric tracer transport model D. Belikov et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5349-2019
- The interhemispheric gradient of SF6 in the upper troposphere T. Schuck et al. 10.5194/acp-24-689-2024
- On the impact of recent developments of the LMDz atmospheric general circulation model on the simulation of CO<sub>2</sub> transport M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4489-2018
- Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
- Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.3390/rs12030375
- Uncertainty in parameterized convection remains a key obstacle for estimating surface fluxes of carbon dioxide A. Schuh & A. Jacobson 10.5194/acp-23-6285-2023
- Unprecedented strength of Hadley circulation in 2015–2016 impacts on CO<sub>2</sub> interhemispheric difference J. Frederiksen & R. Francey 10.5194/acp-18-14837-2018
- Description and evaluation of a detailed gas-phase chemistry scheme in the TM5-MP global chemistry transport model (r112) S. Myriokefalitakis et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5507-2020
- The effect of atmospheric nudging on the stratospheric residual circulation in chemistry–climate models A. Chrysanthou et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11559-2019
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Meridional Propagation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Growth Rate and Flux Anomalies From the Tropics Due to ENSO C. Das et al. 10.1029/2022GL100105
- Global atmospheric monitoring of radionuclides and noble gases: Insights into the interhemispheric transport of anthropogenic emissions J. Kuśmierczyk-Michulec & J. Baré 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120304
- An Analysis of Interhemispheric Transport Pathways Based on Three‐Dimensional Methane Data by GOSAT Observations and Model Simulations D. Belikov et al. 10.1029/2021JD035688
- Evaluating Simulations of Interhemispheric Transport: Interhemispheric Exchange Time Versus SF6 Age H. Yang et al. 10.1029/2018GL080960
- Application of a Nudged General Circulation Model to the Interpretation of the Mean Age of Air Derived from Stratospheric Samples in the Tropics T. NGUYEN et al. 10.2151/jmsj.2021-056
- Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates A. Schuh et al. 10.1029/2018GB006086
- Improved Chemical Tracer Simulation by MIROC4.0-based Atmospheric Chemistry-Transport Model (MIROC4-ACTM) P. Patra et al. 10.2151/sola.2018-016
- Age of martian air: Time scales for martian atmospheric transport D. Waugh et al. 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.002
40 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Extratropical age of air trends and causative factors in climate projection simulations P. Šácha et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7627-2019
- Influence of Atmospheric Transport on Estimates of Variability in the Global Methane Burden S. Pandey et al. 10.1029/2018GL081092
- A top-down estimation of subnational CO2 budget using a global high-resolution inverse model with data from regional surface networks L. Nayagam et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f74
- Country-level methane emissions and their sectoral trends during 2009–2020 estimated by high-resolution inversion of GOSAT and surface observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2436
- Global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inverse models converging on neutral tropical land exchange, but disagreeing on fossil fuel and atmospheric growth rate B. Gaubert et al. 10.5194/bg-16-117-2019
- The increasing atmospheric burden of the greenhouse gas sulfur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) P. Simmonds et al. 10.5194/acp-20-7271-2020
- Asymmetry and pathways of inter-hemispheric transport in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere X. Yan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021
- Opinion: Tropical cirrus – from micro-scale processes to climate-scale impacts B. Gasparini et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15413-2023
- Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH S. Naus et al. 10.5194/acp-19-407-2019
- Simulating age of air and the distribution of SF<sub>6</sub> in the stratosphere with the SILAM model R. Kouznetsov et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5837-2020
- Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years J. Xiao et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111383
- Determination of the chemical equator from GEOS-Chem model simulation: a focus on the tropical western Pacific region X. Sun et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023
- ENSO-driven reverse coupling in interannual variability of pantropical water availability and global atmospheric CO2 growth rate A. Zhang & G. Jia 10.1088/1748-9326/ab66cc
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Upper tropospheric CH<sub>4</sub> and CO affected by the South Asian summer monsoon during the Oxidation Mechanism Observations mission L. Tomsche et al. 10.5194/acp-19-1915-2019
- National CO2budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Model simulations of atmospheric methane (1997–2016) and their evaluation using NOAA and AGAGE surface and IAGOS-CARIBIC aircraft observations P. Zimmermann et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5787-2020
- Seasonal Variations of SF6, CO2, CH4, and N2O in the UT/LS Region due to Emissions, Transport, and Chemistry J. Bisht et al. 10.1029/2020JD033541
- A three-dimensional-model inversion of methyl chloroform to constrain the atmospheric oxidative capacity S. Naus et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4809-2021
- Comparison of mean age of air in five reanalyses using the BASCOE transport model S. Chabrillat et al. 10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- Reducing errors on estimates of the carbon uptake period based on time series of atmospheric CO2 T. Kariyathan et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3299-2023
- Gravitational separation of Ar∕N<sub>2</sub> and age of air in the lowermost stratosphere in airborne observations and a chemical transport model B. Birner et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12391-2020
- Investigating the differences in calculating global mean surface CO2 abundance: the impact of analysis methodologies and site selection Z. Wu et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1249-2024
- Three-dimensional simulation of stratospheric gravitational separation using the NIES global atmospheric tracer transport model D. Belikov et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5349-2019
- The interhemispheric gradient of SF6 in the upper troposphere T. Schuck et al. 10.5194/acp-24-689-2024
- On the impact of recent developments of the LMDz atmospheric general circulation model on the simulation of CO<sub>2</sub> transport M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4489-2018
- Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
- Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.3390/rs12030375
- Uncertainty in parameterized convection remains a key obstacle for estimating surface fluxes of carbon dioxide A. Schuh & A. Jacobson 10.5194/acp-23-6285-2023
- Unprecedented strength of Hadley circulation in 2015–2016 impacts on CO<sub>2</sub> interhemispheric difference J. Frederiksen & R. Francey 10.5194/acp-18-14837-2018
- Description and evaluation of a detailed gas-phase chemistry scheme in the TM5-MP global chemistry transport model (r112) S. Myriokefalitakis et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5507-2020
- The effect of atmospheric nudging on the stratospheric residual circulation in chemistry–climate models A. Chrysanthou et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11559-2019
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Meridional Propagation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Growth Rate and Flux Anomalies From the Tropics Due to ENSO C. Das et al. 10.1029/2022GL100105
- Global atmospheric monitoring of radionuclides and noble gases: Insights into the interhemispheric transport of anthropogenic emissions J. Kuśmierczyk-Michulec & J. Baré 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120304
- An Analysis of Interhemispheric Transport Pathways Based on Three‐Dimensional Methane Data by GOSAT Observations and Model Simulations D. Belikov et al. 10.1029/2021JD035688
- Evaluating Simulations of Interhemispheric Transport: Interhemispheric Exchange Time Versus SF6 Age H. Yang et al. 10.1029/2018GL080960
- Application of a Nudged General Circulation Model to the Interpretation of the Mean Age of Air Derived from Stratospheric Samples in the Tropics T. NGUYEN et al. 10.2151/jmsj.2021-056
- Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates A. Schuh et al. 10.1029/2018GB006086
Latest update: 19 Apr 2024
Short summary
The TransCom inter-comparison project regularly carries out studies to quantify errors in simulated atmospheric transport. This paper presents the first results of an age of air (AoA) inter-comparison of six global transport models. Following a protocol, six models simulated five tracers from which atmospheric transport times can easily be deduced. Results highlight that inter-model differences associated with atmospheric transport are still large and require further analysis.
The TransCom inter-comparison project regularly carries out studies to quantify errors in...
