Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 11, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3159–3185, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3159-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3159–3185, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3159-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 10 Aug 2018

Model description paper | 10 Aug 2018

The multi-assumption architecture and testbed (MAAT v1.0): R code for generating ensembles with dynamic model structure and analysis of epistemic uncertainty from multiple sources

Anthony P. Walker et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,352 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
959 374 19 1,352 36 34
  • HTML: 959
  • PDF: 374
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 1,352
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,322 with geography defined and 9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 17 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Large uncertainty is inherent in model predictions due to imperfect knowledge of how to describe the processes that a model is intended to represent. Yet methods to quantify and evaluate this model hypothesis uncertainty are limited. To address this, the multi-assumption architecture and testbed (MAAT) automates the generation of all possible models by combining multiple representations of multiple processes. MAAT provides a formal framework for quantification of model hypothesis uncertainty.
Large uncertainty is inherent in model predictions due to imperfect knowledge of how to describe...
Citation