Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
01 Oct 2018
Development and technical paper |
| 01 Oct 2018
| 01 Oct 2018
A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Alf Grini
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Dirk Olivié
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Øyvind Seland
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Kari Alterskjær
CICERO Center for International Climate Research, 0349 Oslo, Norway
Department of Geosciences, Section for Meteorology and Oceanography, University of Oslo, 1022 Oslo, Norway
Matthias Hummel
Department of Geosciences, Section for Meteorology and Oceanography, University of Oslo, 1022 Oslo, Norway
Inger H. H. Karset
Department of Geosciences, Section for Meteorology and Oceanography, University of Oslo, 1022 Oslo, Norway
Anna Lewinschal
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Xiaohong Liu
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming,
Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA
Risto Makkonen
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics,
Faculty of Science, P.O. Box 64,
00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Climate System Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O.
Box 503, 00101, Helsinki, Finland
Ingo Bethke
Uni Research Climate, Bjerknes Centre for Climate
Research, P.O. Box 7810, 5020 Bergen, Norway
Jan Griesfeller
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Trond Iversen
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
CICERO Center for International Climate Research, 0349 Oslo, Norway
Viewed
Total article views: 4,986 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 May 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,253 | 1,619 | 114 | 4,986 | 116 | 84 |
- HTML: 3,253
- PDF: 1,619
- XML: 114
- Total: 4,986
- BibTeX: 116
- EndNote: 84
Total article views: 4,145 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Oct 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,823 | 1,215 | 107 | 4,145 | 107 | 74 |
- HTML: 2,823
- PDF: 1,215
- XML: 107
- Total: 4,145
- BibTeX: 107
- EndNote: 74
Total article views: 841 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 May 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 430 | 404 | 7 | 841 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 430
- PDF: 404
- XML: 7
- Total: 841
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,986 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,462 with geography defined
and 524 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,145 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,655 with geography defined
and 490 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 841 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 807 with geography defined
and 34 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
43 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The influence of Antarctic sea‐ice loss on Northern Hemisphere cold surges and associated compound events T. Su et al. 10.1002/joc.8354
- Fast responses on pre-industrial climate from present-day aerosols in a CMIP6 multi-model study P. Zanis et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8381-2020
- The Regional Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (RAMIP) L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-4451-2023
- BVOC–aerosol–climate feedbacks investigated using NorESM M. Sporre et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4763-2019
- Constraining global transport of perfluoroalkyl acids on sea spray aerosol using field measurements B. Sha et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl1026
- Evaluation of aerosol and cloud properties in three climate models using MODIS observations and its corresponding COSP simulator, as well as their application in aerosol–cloud interactions G. Saponaro et al. 10.5194/acp-20-1607-2020
- An aerosol classification scheme for global simulations using the K-means machine learning method J. Li et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-509-2022
- Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations Ø. Seland et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020
- Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021
- Arctic amplification under global warming of 1.5 and 2 °C in NorESM1-Happi L. Graff et al. 10.5194/esd-10-569-2019
- AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations J. Gliß et al. 10.5194/acp-21-87-2021
- Absorbing aerosols over Asia – an inter-model and model-observation comparison study using CAM5.3-Oslo L. Frey et al. 10.1080/16000889.2021.1909815
- An inter-comparison of the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in CMIP6 models A. Keen et al. 10.5194/tc-15-951-2021
- Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last 2 decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis A. Mortier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-13355-2020
- The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics H. Ahsan et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
- Using Satellite Observations to Evaluate Model Microphysical Representation of Arctic Mixed‐Phase Clouds J. Shaw et al. 10.1029/2021GL096191
- Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation G. Fanourgakis et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8591-2019
- Present-Day PM2.5 over Asia: Simulation and Uncertainty in CMIP6 ESMs X. Su et al. 10.1007/s13351-022-1202-7
- Process-evaluation of forest aerosol-cloud-climate feedback shows clear evidence from observations and large uncertainty in models S. Blichner et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-45001-y
- The projected future degradation in air quality is caused by more abundant natural aerosols in a warmer world J. Gomez et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00688-7
- An Implicit Air Quality Bias Due to the State of Pristine Aerosol X. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021EF001979
- Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11955-2020
- Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model M. Righi et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020
- Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models M. Sporre et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020
- Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models S. Turnock et al. 10.5194/acp-20-14547-2020
- Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): mineral dust R. Checa-Garcia et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10295-2021
- Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols Q. Zhong et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adi3568
- Evaluation and Projection of Surface PM2.5 and Its Exposure on Population in Asia Based on the CMIP6 GCMs Y. Xu et al. 10.3390/ijerph191912092
- Implementing a sectional scheme for early aerosol growth from new particle formation in the Norwegian Earth System Model v2: comparison to observations and climate impacts S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021
- A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity M. Burgos et al. 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020
- Reduced effective radiative forcing from cloud–aerosol interactions (ERF<sub>aci</sub>) with improved treatment of early aerosol growth in an Earth system model S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021
- Exploring Impacts of Size‐Dependent Evaporation and Entrainment in a Global Model I. Karset et al. 10.1029/2019JD031817
- Assessing Climate Change Impact on Water Balance Components Using Integrated Groundwater–Surface Water Models (Case Study: Shazand Plain, Iran) F. Soltani et al. 10.3390/w15040813
- Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models J. Bock et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
- Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
- Atmospheric nanoparticle growth D. Stolzenburg et al. 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045002
- Can global warming bring more dust? Y. Zhou et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06706-w
- Comparison of particle number size distribution trends in ground measurements and climate models V. Leinonen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12873-2022
- Detection and attribution of aerosol–cloud interactions in large-domain large-eddy simulations with the ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic model M. Costa-Surós et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5657-2020
- Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme H. Wan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024
- Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes I. Karset et al. 10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018
42 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The influence of Antarctic sea‐ice loss on Northern Hemisphere cold surges and associated compound events T. Su et al. 10.1002/joc.8354
- Fast responses on pre-industrial climate from present-day aerosols in a CMIP6 multi-model study P. Zanis et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8381-2020
- The Regional Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (RAMIP) L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-4451-2023
- BVOC–aerosol–climate feedbacks investigated using NorESM M. Sporre et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4763-2019
- Constraining global transport of perfluoroalkyl acids on sea spray aerosol using field measurements B. Sha et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl1026
- Evaluation of aerosol and cloud properties in three climate models using MODIS observations and its corresponding COSP simulator, as well as their application in aerosol–cloud interactions G. Saponaro et al. 10.5194/acp-20-1607-2020
- An aerosol classification scheme for global simulations using the K-means machine learning method J. Li et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-509-2022
- Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations Ø. Seland et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020
- Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021
- Arctic amplification under global warming of 1.5 and 2 °C in NorESM1-Happi L. Graff et al. 10.5194/esd-10-569-2019
- AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations J. Gliß et al. 10.5194/acp-21-87-2021
- Absorbing aerosols over Asia – an inter-model and model-observation comparison study using CAM5.3-Oslo L. Frey et al. 10.1080/16000889.2021.1909815
- An inter-comparison of the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in CMIP6 models A. Keen et al. 10.5194/tc-15-951-2021
- Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last 2 decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis A. Mortier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-13355-2020
- The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics H. Ahsan et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
- Using Satellite Observations to Evaluate Model Microphysical Representation of Arctic Mixed‐Phase Clouds J. Shaw et al. 10.1029/2021GL096191
- Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation G. Fanourgakis et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8591-2019
- Present-Day PM2.5 over Asia: Simulation and Uncertainty in CMIP6 ESMs X. Su et al. 10.1007/s13351-022-1202-7
- Process-evaluation of forest aerosol-cloud-climate feedback shows clear evidence from observations and large uncertainty in models S. Blichner et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-45001-y
- The projected future degradation in air quality is caused by more abundant natural aerosols in a warmer world J. Gomez et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00688-7
- An Implicit Air Quality Bias Due to the State of Pristine Aerosol X. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021EF001979
- Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11955-2020
- Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model M. Righi et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020
- Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models M. Sporre et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020
- Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models S. Turnock et al. 10.5194/acp-20-14547-2020
- Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): mineral dust R. Checa-Garcia et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10295-2021
- Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols Q. Zhong et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adi3568
- Evaluation and Projection of Surface PM2.5 and Its Exposure on Population in Asia Based on the CMIP6 GCMs Y. Xu et al. 10.3390/ijerph191912092
- Implementing a sectional scheme for early aerosol growth from new particle formation in the Norwegian Earth System Model v2: comparison to observations and climate impacts S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021
- A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity M. Burgos et al. 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020
- Reduced effective radiative forcing from cloud–aerosol interactions (ERF<sub>aci</sub>) with improved treatment of early aerosol growth in an Earth system model S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021
- Exploring Impacts of Size‐Dependent Evaporation and Entrainment in a Global Model I. Karset et al. 10.1029/2019JD031817
- Assessing Climate Change Impact on Water Balance Components Using Integrated Groundwater–Surface Water Models (Case Study: Shazand Plain, Iran) F. Soltani et al. 10.3390/w15040813
- Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models J. Bock et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
- Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
- Atmospheric nanoparticle growth D. Stolzenburg et al. 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045002
- Can global warming bring more dust? Y. Zhou et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06706-w
- Comparison of particle number size distribution trends in ground measurements and climate models V. Leinonen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12873-2022
- Detection and attribution of aerosol–cloud interactions in large-domain large-eddy simulations with the ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic model M. Costa-Surós et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5657-2020
- Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme H. Wan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 17 Apr 2024
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(6489 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
A new aerosol treatment is described and tested in a global climate model. With updated emissions, aerosol chemistry, and microphysics compared to its predecessor, black carbon (BC) mass concentrations aloft better fit observations, surface concentrations of BC and sea salt are less biased, and sulfate and mineral dust slightly more, while the results for organics are inconclusive. Man-made aerosols now yield a stronger cooling effect on climate that is strong compared to results from IPCC.
A new aerosol treatment is described and tested in a global climate model. With updated...
