Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4069-4084, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4069-4084, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4069-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 10 Oct 2018

Model evaluation paper | 10 Oct 2018

Comparison of dealiasing schemes in large-eddy simulation of neutrally stratified atmospheric flows

Fabien Margairaz et al.
Related subject area  
Atmospheric Sciences
The AFWA dust emission scheme for the GOCART aerosol model in WRF-Chem v3.8.1
Sandra L. LeGrand, Chris Polashenski, Theodore W. Letcher, Glenn A. Creighton, Steven E. Peckham, and Jeffrey D. Cetola
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 131-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-131-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-131-2019, 2019
Short summary
Global tropospheric effects of aromatic chemistry with the SAPRC-11 mechanism implemented in GEOS-Chem version 9-02
Yingying Yan, David Cabrera-Perez, Jintai Lin, Andrea Pozzer, Lu Hu, Dylan B. Millet, William C. Porter, and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 111-130, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Ensemble forecasts of air quality in eastern China – Part 1: Model description and implementation of the MarcoPolo–Panda prediction system, version 1
Guy P. Brasseur, Ying Xie, Anna Katinka Petersen, Idir Bouarar, Johannes Flemming, Michael Gauss, Fei Jiang, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Richard Kranenburg, Bas Mijling, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Matthieu Pommier, Arjo Segers, Mikhail Sofiev, Renske Timmermans, Ronald van der A, Stacy Walters, Jianming Xu, and Guangqiang Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 33-67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-33-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-33-2019, 2019
Short summary
TPVTrack v1.0: a watershed segmentation and overlap correspondence method for tracking tropopause polar vortices
Nicholas Szapiro and Steven Cavallo
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5173-5187, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5173-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5173-2018, 2018
Short summary
From climatological to small-scale applications: simulating water isotopologues with ICON-ART-Iso (version 2.3)
Johannes Eckstein, Roland Ruhnke, Stephan Pfahl, Emanuel Christner, Christopher Diekmann, Christoph Dyroff, Daniel Reinert, Daniel Rieger, Matthias Schneider, Jennifer Schröter, Andreas Zahn, and Peter Braesicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5113-5133, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5113-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5113-2018, 2018
Short summary
Cited articles  
Abkar, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Mean and turbulent kinetic energy budgets inside and above very large wind farms under conventionally-neutral condition, Renew. Energ., 70, 142–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.050, 2014. a
Albertson, J. D.: Large Eddy Simulation of Land-Atmosphere Interaction, Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Davis, Hydrol. Sci., an optional note, 1996. a
Albertson, J. D. and Parlange, M. B.: Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00011-1, 1999. a, b
Albertson, J. D., Parlange, M. B., Katul, G. G., Chu, C.- R., Stricker, H., and Tyler, S.: Sensible Heat Flux From Arid Regions: A Simple Flux-Variance Method, Water Resour. Res., 31, 969973, https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02978, 1995. a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Boundary-layer development and gravity waves in conventionally neutral wind farms, J. Fluid Mechan., 814, 95–130, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.11, 2017. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this project, we compare three different approaches to integrate the fluid-motion equations when applied to solve atmospheric flow dynamics. Differences between the three methods reside in accuracy as well as computational cost. The results illustrate that there is an intermediate solution that performs well in terms of computational cost while at the same time producing good enough results, as long one is not interested in the smallest turbulent scales.
In this project, we compare three different approaches to integrate the fluid-motion equations...
Citation
Share