Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4155–4174, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4155-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4155–4174, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4155-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 16 Oct 2018

Model evaluation paper | 16 Oct 2018

Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry

Benjamin Brown-Steiner et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,925 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,279 620 26 1,925 143 27 36
  • HTML: 1,279
  • PDF: 620
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 1,925
  • Supplement: 143
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,853 with geography defined and 15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 08 Dec 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We conduct three simulations of atmospheric chemistry using chemical mechanisms of different levels of complexity and compare their results to observations. We explore situations in which the simplified mechanisms match the output of the most complex mechanism, as well as when they diverge. We investigate how concurrent utilization of chemical mechanisms of different complexities can further our atmospheric-chemistry understanding at various scales and give some strategies for future research.
We conduct three simulations of atmospheric chemistry using chemical mechanisms of different...
Citation