Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 843-859, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 843-859, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 06 Mar 2018

Model description paper | 06 Mar 2018

Isca, v1.0: a framework for the global modelling of the atmospheres of Earth and other planets at varying levels of complexity

Geoffrey K. Vallis et al.
Related authors  
Quantifying the variability of the annular modes: reanalysis uncertainty vs. sampling uncertainty
Edwin P. Gerber and Patrick Martineau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17099-17117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17099-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17099-2018, 2018
Short summary
Volume and temperature transports through the main Arctic Gateways: A comparative study between an ocean reanalysis and mooring-derived data
Marianne Pietschnig, Michael Mayer, Takamasa Tsubouchi, Andrea Storto, Sebastian Stichelberger, and Leopold Haimberger
Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2017-98,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2017-98, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems
Masatomo Fujiwara, Jonathon S. Wright, Gloria L. Manney, Lesley J. Gray, James Anstey, Thomas Birner, Sean Davis, Edwin P. Gerber, V. Lynn Harvey, Michaela I. Hegglin, Cameron R. Homeyer, John A. Knox, Kirstin Krüger, Alyn Lambert, Craig S. Long, Patrick Martineau, Andrea Molod, Beatriz M. Monge-Sanz, Michelle L. Santee, Susann Tegtmeier, Simon Chabrillat, David G. H. Tan, David R. Jackson, Saroja Polavarapu, Gilbert P. Compo, Rossana Dragani, Wesley Ebisuzaki, Yayoi Harada, Chiaki Kobayashi, Will McCarty, Kazutoshi Onogi, Steven Pawson, Adrian Simmons, Krzysztof Wargan, Jeffrey S. Whitaker, and Cheng-Zhi Zou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1417-1452, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017, 2017
Short summary
A comparison of Loon balloon observations and stratospheric reanalysis products
Leon S. Friedrich, Adrian J. McDonald, Gregory E. Bodeker, Kathy E. Cooper, Jared Lewis, and Alexander J. Paterson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 855-866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017, 2017
Short summary
The Dynamics and Variability Model Intercomparison Project (DynVarMIP) for CMIP6: assessing the stratosphere–troposphere system
Edwin P. Gerber and Elisa Manzini
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3413-3425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016, 2016
Short summary
Related subject area  
Atmospheric Sciences
Quantifying uncertainties due to chemistry modelling – evaluation of tropospheric composition simulations in the CAMS model (cycle 43R1)
Vincent Huijnen, Andrea Pozzer, Joaquim Arteta, Guy Brasseur, Idir Bouarar, Simon Chabrillat, Yves Christophe, Thierno Doumbia, Johannes Flemming, Jonathan Guth, Béatrice Josse, Vlassis A. Karydis, Virginie Marécal, and Sophie Pelletier
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1725-1752, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1725-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1725-2019, 2019
Short summary
Evaluating the Met Office Unified Model land surface temperature in Global Atmosphere/Land 3.1 (GA/L3.1), Global Atmosphere/Land 6.1 (GA/L6.1) and limited area 2.2 km configurations
Jennifer K. Brooke, R. Chawn Harlow, Russell L. Scott, Martin J. Best, John M. Edwards, Jean-Claude Thelen, and Mark Weeks
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1703-1724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1703-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1703-2019, 2019
Short summary
The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation
Ina Tegen, David Neubauer, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Colombe Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Isabelle Bey, Nick Schutgens, Philip Stier, Duncan Watson-Parris, Tanja Stanelle, Hauke Schmidt, Sebastian Rast, Harri Kokkola, Martin Schultz, Sabine Schroeder, Nikos Daskalakis, Stefan Barthel, Bernd Heinold, and Ulrike Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1643-1677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019, 2019
Short summary
Scalable diagnostics for global atmospheric chemistry using Ristretto library (version 1.0)
Meghana Velegar, N. Benjamin Erichson, Christoph A. Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1525-1539, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1525-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1525-2019, 2019
Short summary
Implementation of the sectional aerosol module SALSA2.0 into the PALM model system 6.0: model development and first evaluation
Mona Kurppa, Antti Hellsten, Pontus Roldin, Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Mikko Auvinen, Christoph Kent, Prashant Kumar, Björn Maronga, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1403-1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Betts, A. K.: A new convective adjustment scheme, Part I: Observational and theoretical basis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677–691, 1986. a
Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme, Part II: Single column test using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and Arctic air mass data sets, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709, 1986. a
Blackburn, M. and Hoskins, B. J.: Context and aims of the Aqua-Planet Experiment, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 91, 1–15, 2013. 
Bourke, W.: A multilevel spectral model, I. Formulation and hemispheric integrations, Mon. Weather Rev., 102, 687–701, 1974. a
Boutle, I. A., Mayne, N. J., Drummond, B., Manners, J., Goyal, J., Lambert, F. H., Acreman, D. M., and Earnshaw, P. D.: Exploring the climate of Proxima B with the Met Office Unified Model, Astron. Astrophys., 601, A120, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630020, 2017. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The models that are used to describe the atmospheres of Earth and other planets are often very complicated. Although this is necessary for such things as weather prediction, it does not help in understanding. Furthermore, when studying other planets, there are insufficient data to warrant the use of complicated models. We have developed a framework that allows the construction of models of appropriate complexity for the problem at hand, and thus helps to actually model these atmospheres.
The models that are used to describe the atmospheres of Earth and other planets are often very...
Citation