Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1029–1066, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1029-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1029–1066, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1029-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Development and technical paper 22 Mar 2019

Development and technical paper | 22 Mar 2019

CORDEX-WRF v1.3: development of a module for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to support the CORDEX community

Lluís Fita et al.

Related authors

ORCHIDEE-ROUTING: revising the river routing scheme using a high-resolution hydrological database
Trung Nguyen-Quang, Jan Polcher, Agnès Ducharne, Thomas Arsouze, Xudong Zhou, Ana Schneider, and Lluís Fita
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4965–4985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4965-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4965-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth System Modeling
Development of a sequential tool, LMDZ-NEMO-med-V1, to conduct global-to-regional past climate simulation for the Mediterranean basin: an Early Holocene case study
Tristan Vadsaria, Laurent Li, Gilles Ramstein, and Jean-Claude Dutay
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2337–2354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2337-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2337-2020, 2020
Short summary
The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0)
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Juraj Balkovic, Philippe Ciais, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, Munir Hoffmann, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Nikolay Khabarov, Marian Koch, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Xuhui Wang, Karina Williams, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2315–2336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020, 2020
Short summary
Assessing the performance of climate change simulation results from BESM-OA2.5 compared with a CMIP5 model ensemble
Vinicius Buscioli Capistrano, Paulo Nobre, Sandro F. Veiga, Renata Tedeschi, Josiane Silva, Marcus Bottino, Manoel Baptista da Silva Jr., Otacílio Leandro Menezes Neto, Silvio Nilo Figueroa, José Paulo Bonatti, Paulo Yoshio Kubota, Julio Pablo Reyes Fernandez, Emanuel Giarolla, Jessica Vial, and Carlos A. Nobre
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2277–2296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks
Tomohiro Hajima, Michio Watanabe, Akitomo Yamamoto, Hiroaki Tatebe, Maki A. Noguchi, Manabu Abe, Rumi Ohgaito, Akinori Ito, Dai Yamazaki, Hideki Okajima, Akihiko Ito, Kumiko Takata, Koji Ogochi, Shingo Watanabe, and Michio Kawamiya
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2197–2244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020, 2020
Short summary
Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6)
Charlotte Pascoe, Bryan N. Lawrence, Eric Guilyardi, Martin Juckes, and Karl E. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2149–2167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Barella-Ortiz, A., Polcher, J., Tuzet, A., and Laval, K.: Potential evaporation estimation through an unstressed surface-energy balance and its sensitivity to climate change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4625–4639, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4625-2013, 2013. a
Benjamin, S. G. and Miller, P. A.: An Alternative Sea Level Pressure Reduction and a Statistical Comparison of Geostrophic Wind Estimates with Observed Surface Winds, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 2099–2116, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<2099:AASLPR>2.0.CO;2, 1990. a, b
Bergot, T., Terradellas, E., Cuxart, J., Mira, A., Liechti, O., Mueller, M., and Nielsen, N. W.: Intercomparison of Single-Column Numerical Models for the Prediction of Radiation Fog, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 504–521, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2475.1, 2007. a
Brasseur, O.: Development and Application of a Physical Approach to Estimating Wind Gusts, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 5–25, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0005:DAAOAP>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a, b
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 181–189, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO;2, 1971. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Regional climate experiments coordinated throughout CORDEX aim to study and provide high-quality climate data over a given region. The data are used in climate change mitigation and adaptation policy studies and by stakeholders. CORDEX requires a list of variables, most of which are not provided by atmospheric models. Aiming to help the community and to maximize the use of CORDEX exercises, we create a new module for WRF models to directly produce them by adding generic and additional ones.
Regional climate experiments coordinated throughout CORDEX aim to study and provide high-quality...
Citation