Articles | Volume 12, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
24 Apr 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 24 Apr 2019

The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation

Ina Tegen, David Neubauer, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Colombe Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Isabelle Bey, Nick Schutgens, Philip Stier, Duncan Watson-Parris, Tanja Stanelle, Hauke Schmidt, Sebastian Rast, Harri Kokkola, Martin Schultz, Sabine Schroeder, Nikos Daskalakis, Stefan Barthel, Bernd Heinold, and Ulrike Lohmann

Data sets

EUSAAR size distribution analysis database Ari Asmi, Alfred Wiedensohler, Paolo Laj, Ann-Mari Fjaeraa, Karine Sellegri, Wolfram Birmili, Ernst Weingartner, Urs Baltensperger, Vladimir Zdimal, Nadezda Zikova, Jean-Philippe Putaud, Angela Marinoni, Peter Tunved, Hans-Christen Hansson, Markus Fiebig, Niku Kivekäs, Heikki Lihavainen, Eija Asmi, V. Ulevicius, Pasi Aalto, Erik Swietlicki, Adam Kristensson, Nikos Mihalopoulos, N. Kalivitis, Ivo Kalapov, Guyla Kiss, Gerrit de Leeuw, Bas Henzing, Roy M. Harrison, David Beddows, Colin O'Dowd, Gerald S. Jennings, Harald Flentje, K> Weinhold, F. Meinhardt, L. Ries, and Markku Kulmala https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.861856

Short summary
We describe a new version of the aerosol–climate model ECHAM–HAM and show tests of the model performance by comparing different aspects of the aerosol distribution with different datasets. The updated version of HAM contains improved descriptions of aerosol processes, including updated emission fields and cloud processes. While there are regional deviations between the model and observations, the model performs well overall.