Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2069–2089, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2069–2089, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 28 May 2019

Methods for assessment of models | 28 May 2019

The quasi-equilibrium framework revisited: analyzing long-term CO2 enrichment responses in plant–soil models

Mingkai Jiang et al.
Model code and software

The quasi-equilibrium framework analytical platform Mingkai Jiang, Sonke Zaehle, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anthony P. Walker, Silvia Caldararu, David S. Ellsworth, and Belinda E. Medlyn https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2574192

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Here we used a simple analytical framework developed by Comins and McMurtrie (1993) to investigate how different model assumptions affected plant responses to elevated CO2. This framework is useful in revealing both the consequences and the mechanisms through which different assumptions affect predictions. We therefore recommend the use of this framework to analyze the likely outcomes of new assumptions before introducing them to complex model structures.
Here we used a simple analytical framework developed by Comins and McMurtrie (1993) to...
Citation