A spatial evaluation of high-resolution wind fields from empirical and dynamical modeling in hilly and mountainous terrain

Schlager, Christoph; Kirchengast, Gottfried; Fuchsberger, Juergen; Kann, Alexander; Truhetz, Heimo

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2855-2019

Articles | Volume 12, issue 7

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2855-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2855-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 12, issue 7

Model evaluation paper

|

11 Jul 2019

Model evaluation paper |

| 11 Jul 2019

A spatial evaluation of high-resolution wind fields from empirical and dynamical modeling in hilly and mountainous terrain

Christoph Schlager, Gottfried Kirchengast, Juergen Fuchsberger, Alexander Kann, and Heimo Truhetz

Download

Final revised paper (published on 11 Jul 2019)
Preprint (discussion started on 08 Oct 2018)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of article: "A spatial evaluation of high-resolution wind fields from empirical and dynamical modeling in hilly and mountainous terrain", by Schlager et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Nov 2018
- AC1: 'Response to Referee #1', Christoph Schlager, 22 Dec 2018
RC2: 'Review of: A spatial evaluation of high-resolution wind fields from empirical and dynamical modeling in hilly and mountainous terrain', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 May 2019
- AC2: 'Response to Referee #2', Christoph Schlager, 23 May 2019

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Christoph Schlager on behalf of the Authors (25 May 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (19 Jun 2019) by Richard Neale

Short summary

Empirical high-resolution surface wind fields from two study areas, automatically generated by a weather diagnostic application, were intercompared with wind fields of different modeling approaches. The focus is on evaluating spatial differences and displacements between the different datasets. In general, the spatial verification indicates a better statistical agreement for the first study area (hilly WegenerNet Feldbach Region), than for the second one (mountainous WegenerNet Johnsbachtal).