Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
05 Aug 2019
Methods for assessment of models |  | 05 Aug 2019

Assessment of wavelet-based spatial verification by means of a stochastic precipitation model (wv_verif v0.1.0)

Sebastian Buschow, Jakiw Pidstrigach, and Petra Friederichs

Related authors

Verification of boundary layer wind patterns in COSMO-REA2 using clear-air radar echoes
Sebastian Buschow and Petra Friederichs
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6765–6780, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6765-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6765-2021, 2021
Short summary
Using wavelets to verify the scale structure of precipitation forecasts
Sebastian Buschow and Petra Friederichs
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 13–30, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-13-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-13-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
GAN-argcPredNet v2.0: a radar echo extrapolation model based on spatiotemporal process enhancement
Kun Zheng, Qiya Tan, Huihua Ruan, Jinbiao Zhang, Cong Luo, Siyu Tang, Yunlei Yi, Yugang Tian, and Jianmei Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 399–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-399-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-399-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of the GEFS-Aerosols annual budget to better understand aerosol predictions simulated in the model
Li Pan, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Li Zhang, Raffaele Montuoro, Barry Baker, Jeff McQueen, Georg A. Grell, Stuart A. McKeen, Shobha Kondragunta, Xiaoyang Zhang, Gregory J. Frost, Fanglin Yang, and Ivanka Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 431–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-431-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-431-2024, 2024
Short summary
A model for rapid PM2.5 exposure estimates in wildfire conditions using routinely available data: rapidfire v0.1.3
Sean Raffuse, Susan O'Neill, and Rebecca Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 381–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-381-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-381-2024, 2024
Short summary
BoundaryLayerDynamics.jl v1.0: a modern codebase for atmospheric boundary-layer simulations
Manuel F. Schmid, Marco G. Giometto, Gregory A. Lawrence, and Marc B. Parlange
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 321–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024, 2024
Short summary
The wave-age-dependent stress parameterisation (WASP) for momentum and heat turbulent fluxes at sea in SURFEX v8.1
Marie-Noëlle Bouin, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Sylvie Malardel, Aurore Voldoire, and César Sauvage
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 117–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Addison, P. S.: The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance, CRC press, 2017. a
Ahijevych, D., Gilleland, E., Brown, B. G., and Ebert, E. E.: Application of spatial verification methods to idealized and NWP-gridded precipitation forecasts, Weather Forecast., 24, 1485–1497, 2009. a, b
Bachmaier, M. and Backes, M.: Variogram or semivariogram? Variance or semivariance? Allan variance or introducing a new term?, Math. Geosci., 43, 735–740, 2011. a
Brune, S., Kapp, F., and Friederichs, P.: A wavelet-based analysis of convective organization in ICON large-eddy simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2812–2829, 2018. a
Buschow, S.: wv_verif (Version 0.1.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3257511, 2019. a
Download
Short summary
Highly resolved forecasts of precipitation fields are difficult to evaluate since individual rain features are typically not placed precisely at the right location. Instead of comparing forecasts and observations pixel by pixel, we base our verification on the fields' wavelet transforms which compactly summarize the overall structure. The methodology is rigorously tested using randomly generated rain fields for which that structure can be determined at will.