Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 343–362, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-343-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: The Norwegian Earth System Model: NorESM; basic development,...

Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 343–362, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-343-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 21 Jan 2019

Model description paper | 21 Jan 2019

Description and evaluation of NorESM1-F: a fast version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM)

Chuncheng Guo et al.
Related authors  
Equilibrium simulations of Marine Isotope Stage 3 climate
Chuncheng Guo, Kerim H. Nisancioglu, Mats Bentsen, Ingo Bethke, and Zhongshi Zhang
Clim. Past, 15, 1133–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1133-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1133-2019, 2019
Short summary
Instability of Northeast Siberian ice sheet during glacials
Zhongshi Zhang, Qing Yan, Elizabeth J. Farmer, Camille Li, Gilles Ramstein, Terence Hughes, Martin Jakobsson, Matt O'Regan, Ran Zhang, Ning Tan, Camille Contoux, Christophe Dumas, and Chuncheng Guo
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-79,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-79, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Related subject area  
Climate and Earth System Modeling
The road weather model RoadSurf (v6.60b) driven by the regional climate model HCLIM38: evaluation over Finland
Erika Toivonen, Marjo Hippi, Hannele Korhonen, Ari Laaksonen, Markku Kangas, and Joni-Pekka Pietikäinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3481–3501, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3481-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3481-2019, 2019
Short summary
Climate projections of a multivariate heat stress index: the role of downscaling and bias correction
Ana Casanueva, Sven Kotlarski, Sixto Herrera, Andreas M. Fischer, Tord Kjellstrom, and Cornelia Schwierz
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3419–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3419-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3419-2019, 2019
Short summary
PatCC1: an efficient parallel triangulation algorithm for spherical and planar grids with commonality and parallel consistency
Haoyu Yang, Li Liu, Cheng Zhang, Ruizhe Li, Chao Sun, Xinzhu Yu, Hao Yu, Zhiyuan Zhang, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3311–3328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3311-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3311-2019, 2019
Short summary
How can the First ISLSCP Field Experiment contribute to present-day efforts to evaluate water stress in JULESv5.0?
Karina E. Williams, Anna B. Harper, Chris Huntingford, Lina M. Mercado, Camilla T. Mathison, Pete D. Falloon, Peter M. Cox, and Joon Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3207–3240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3207-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3207-2019, 2019
Short summary
Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) for the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)
Oliver Gutjahr, Dian Putrasahan, Katja Lohmann, Johann H. Jungclaus, Jin-Song von Storch, Nils Brüggemann, Helmuth Haak, and Achim Stössel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3241–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607, 2012. a, b
Assmann, K. M., Bentsen, M., Segschneider, J., and Heinze, C.: An isopycnic ocean carbon cycle model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-143-2010, 2010. a
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P. G.: Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0001, 1997. a, b
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Bethke, I., Outten, S., Otterå, O. H., Hawkins, E., Wagner, S., Sigl, M., and Thorne, P.: Potential volcanic impacts on future climate variability, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 799–805, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3394, 2017. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we describe and evaluate a new variant of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM). It is a computationally efficient model that is designed for experiments such as paleoclimate, carbon cycle, and large ensemble simulations. The model, with various recent code updates, shows improved climate performance compared to the CMIP5 version of NorESM, while the model resolution remains similar.
In this paper, we describe and evaluate a new variant of the Norwegian Earth System Model...
Citation