Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year
    4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore
    4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 51 Scimago H
    index 51
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 343-362, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-343-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: The Norwegian Earth System Model: NorESM; basic development,...

Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 343-362, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-343-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 21 Jan 2019

Model description paper | 21 Jan 2019

Description and evaluation of NorESM1-F: a fast version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM)

Chuncheng Guo et al.
Related authors  
Equilibrium simulations of Marine Isotope Stage 3 climate
Chuncheng Guo, Kerim H. Nisancioglu, Mats Bentsen, Ingo Bethke, and Zhongshi Zhang
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-165,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-165, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for CP
Short summary
Instability of Northeast Siberian ice sheet during glacials
Zhongshi Zhang, Qing Yan, Elizabeth J. Farmer, Camille Li, Gilles Ramstein, Terence Hughes, Martin Jakobsson, Matt O'Regan, Ran Zhang, Ning Tan, Camille Contoux, Christophe Dumas, and Chuncheng Guo
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-79,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-79, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Related subject area  
Climate and Earth System Modeling
The Monash Simple Climate Model experiments (MSCM-DB v1.0): an interactive database of mean climate, climate change, and scenario simulations
Dietmar Dommenget, Kerry Nice, Tobias Bayr, Dieter Kasang, Christian Stassen, and Michael Rezny
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2155-2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2155-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2155-2019, 2019
Short summary
Evaluation of the WRF lake module (v1.0) and its improvements at a deep reservoir
Fushan Wang, Guangheng Ni, William J. Riley, Jinyun Tang, Dejun Zhu, and Ting Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2119-2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2119-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2119-2019, 2019
Short summary
Calculating the turbulent fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with neural networks
Lukas Hubert Leufen and Gerd Schädler
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2033-2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2033-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2033-2019, 2019
Short summary
BARRA v1.0: the Bureau of Meteorology Atmospheric high-resolution Regional Reanalysis for Australia
Chun-Hsu Su, Nathan Eizenberg, Peter Steinle, Dörte Jakob, Paul Fox-Hughes, Christopher J. White, Susan Rennie, Charmaine Franklin, Imtiaz Dharssi, and Hongyan Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2049-2068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2049-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2049-2019, 2019
Short summary
ATTILA 4.0: Lagrangian advective and convective transport of passive tracers within the ECHAM5/MESSy (2.53.0) chemistry–climate model
Sabine Brinkop and Patrick Jöckel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1991-2008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607, 2012. a, b
Assmann, K. M., Bentsen, M., Segschneider, J., and Heinze, C.: An isopycnic ocean carbon cycle model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-143-2010, 2010. a
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P. G.: Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0001, 1997. a, b
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Bethke, I., Outten, S., Otterå, O. H., Hawkins, E., Wagner, S., Sigl, M., and Thorne, P.: Potential volcanic impacts on future climate variability, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 799–805, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3394, 2017. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we describe and evaluate a new variant of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM). It is a computationally efficient model that is designed for experiments such as paleoclimate, carbon cycle, and large ensemble simulations. The model, with various recent code updates, shows improved climate performance compared to the CMIP5 version of NorESM, while the model resolution remains similar.
In this paper, we describe and evaluate a new variant of the Norwegian Earth System Model...
Citation