Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4571–4584, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4571–4584, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 05 Nov 2019

Model evaluation paper | 05 Nov 2019

Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study

Zhiqiang Li et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,557 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,244 301 12 1,557 22 16 19
  • HTML: 1,244
  • PDF: 301
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 1,557
  • Supplement: 22
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Oct 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,295 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,291 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (discussion paper)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (discussion paper)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 22 Feb 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations and demonstrates its effectiveness with a case study in a fast-urbanizing area (Shenzhen and Hong Kong SAR, China). It is intended to (again) remind urban climate modellers of the necessity of conducting systematic model evaluations in urban-scale climatology modelling and reduce ambiguous or arbitrary modelling practices.
This article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution...
Citation