Articles | Volume 12, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5251-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5251-2019
Model description paper
 | 
13 Dec 2019
Model description paper |  | 13 Dec 2019

TOPMELT 1.0: a topography-based distribution function approach to snowmelt simulation for hydrological modelling at basin scale

Mattia Zaramella, Marco Borga, Davide Zoccatelli, and Luca Carturan

Related authors

Spring-water temperature suggests widespread occurrence of Alpine permafrost in pseudo-relict rock glaciers
Luca Carturan, Giulia Zuecco, Angela Andreotti, Jacopo Boaga, Costanza Morino, Mirko Pavoni, Roberto Seppi, Monica Tolotti, Thomas Zanoner, and Matteo Zumiani
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2689,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2689, 2024
Short summary
Modern air, englacial and permafrost temperatures at high altitude on Mt Ortles (3905 m a.s.l.), in the eastern European Alps
Luca Carturan, Fabrizio De Blasi, Roberto Dinale, Gianfranco Dragà, Paolo Gabrielli, Volkmar Mair, Roberto Seppi, David Tonidandel, Thomas Zanoner, Tiziana Lazzarina Zendrini, and Giancarlo Dalla Fontana
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4661–4688, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4661-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4661-2023, 2023
Short summary
Brief communication: Mountain permafrost acts as an aquitard during an infiltration experiment monitored with electrical resistivity tomography time-lapse measurements
Mirko Pavoni, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Giulia Zuecco, Luca Carturan, and Matteo Zumiani
The Cryosphere, 17, 1601–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023, 2023
Short summary
How well does a convection-permitting regional climate model represent the reverse orographic effect of extreme hourly precipitation?
Eleonora Dallan, Francesco Marra, Giorgia Fosser, Marco Marani, Giuseppe Formetta, Christoph Schär, and Marco Borga
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1133–1149, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comparative study of plant water extraction methods for isotopic analyses: Scholander-type pressure chamber vs. cryogenic vacuum distillation
Giulia Zuecco, Anam Amin, Jay Frentress, Michael Engel, Chiara Marchina, Tommaso Anfodillo, Marco Borga, Vinicio Carraro, Francesca Scandellari, Massimo Tagliavini, Damiano Zanotelli, Francesco Comiti, and Daniele Penna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3673–3689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3673-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3673-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
mesas.py v1.0: a flexible Python package for modeling solute transport and transit times using StorAge Selection functions
Ciaran J. Harman and Esther Xu Fei
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 477–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, 2024
Short summary
rSHUD v2.0: advancing the Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains and unstructured hydrological modeling in the R environment
Lele Shu, Paul Ullrich, Xianhong Meng, Christopher Duffy, Hao Chen, and Zhaoguo Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 497–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abudu, S., Sheng, Z., Cui, C., Saydi, M., Sabzi, H.-Z., and King, J. P.: Integration of aspect and slope in snowmelt runoff modeling in a mountain watershed, Water Sci. Eng., 9, 265–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WSE.2016.07.002, 2016. a
Anderson, E. A.: A Point Energy And Mass Balance Model of a Snow Cover. Silver Spring, Md.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, 1976. a, b
Anslow, F. S., Hostetler, S., Bidlake, W. R., and Clark, P. U.: Distributed energy balance modeling of South Cascade Glacier, Washington and assessment of model uncertainty, J. Geophys. Res., 113, F02019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000850, 2008. a
Armstrong, R. L., Richard, L., and Brun, E.: Snow and climate: physical processes, surface energy exchange and modeling, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 9780521 854542, 2008. a
Avanzi, F., De Michele, C., Morin, S., Carmagnola, C. M., Ghezzi, A. and Lejeune, Y.: Model complexity and data requirements in snow hydrology: seeking a balance in practical applications, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2106–2118, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10782, 2016. a
Download
Short summary
This paper presents TOPMELT, a parsimonious snowpack simulation model integrated into a basin-scale hydrological model. TOPMELT implements the full spatial distribution of clear-sky potential solar radiation by means of a statistical representation: this approach reduces computational burden, which is a key potential advantage when parameter sensitivity and uncertainty estimation procedures are carried out. The model is assessed by examining different resolutions of its domain.