Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 01 Feb 2019

Model description paper | 01 Feb 2019

Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation

J. Christopher Kaiser et al.
Related authors  
Global simulation of semivolatile organic compounds – development and evaluation of the MESSy submodel SVOC (v1.0)
Mega Octaviani, Holger Tost, and Gerhard Lammel
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3585–3607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3585-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3585-2019, 2019
Short summary
Clear-sky ultraviolet radiation modelling using output from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative
Kévin Lamy, Thierry Portafaix, Béatrice Josse, Colette Brogniez, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Hassan Bencherif, Laura Revell, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Slimane Bekki, Michaela I. Hegglin, Patrick Jöckel, Oliver Kirner, Ben Liley, Virginie Marecal, Olaf Morgenstern, Andrea Stenke, Guang Zeng, N. Luke Abraham, Alexander T. Archibald, Neil Butchart, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Glauco Di Genova, Makoto Deushi, Sandip S. Dhomse, Rong-Ming Hu, Douglas Kinnison, Michael Kotkamp, Richard McKenzie, Martine Michou, Fiona M. O'Connor, Luke D. Oman, Giovanni Pitari, David A. Plummer, John A. Pyle, Eugene Rozanov, David Saint-Martin, Kengo Sudo, Taichu Y. Tanaka, Daniele Visioni, and Kohei Yoshida
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10087–10110, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10087-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10087-2019, 2019
Short summary
Description and Evaluation of the Specified-Dynamics Experiment in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)
Clara Orbe, David A. Plummer, Darryn W. Waugh, Huang Yang, Patrick Jöckel, Douglas E. Kinnison, Beatrice Josse, Virginie Marecal, Makoto Deushi, Nathan Luke Abraham, Alexander T. Archibald, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Sandip Dhomse, Wuhu Feng, and Slimane Bekki
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-625,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-625, 2019
Manuscript under review for ACP
Short summary
Influence of Arctic stratospheric ozone on surface climate in CCMI models
Ohad Harari, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, Olaf Morgenstern, Guang Zeng, Simone Tilmes, Douglas Kinnison, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Andrea Pozzer, Fiona M. O'Connor, and Sean Davis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9253–9268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9253-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9253-2019, 2019
Short summary
Aerosol influences on low-level clouds in the West African monsoon
Jonathan W. Taylor, Sophie L. Haslett, Keith Bower, Michael Flynn, Ian Crawford, James Dorsey, Tom Choularton, Paul J. Connolly, Valerian Hahn, Christiane Voigt, Daniel Sauer, Régis Dupuy, Joel Brito, Alfons Schwarzenboeck, Thierry Bourriane, Cyrielle Denjean, Phil Rosenberg, Cyrille Flamant, James D. Lee, Adam R. Vaughan, Peter G. Hill, Barbara Brooks, Valéry Catoire, Peter Knippertz, and Hugh Coe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8503–8522, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8503-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8503-2019, 2019
Short summary
Related subject area  
Atmospheric Sciences
The upper-atmosphere extension of the ICON general circulation model (version: ua-icon-1.0)
Sebastian Borchert, Guidi Zhou, Michael Baldauf, Hauke Schmidt, Günther Zängl, and Daniel Reinert
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3541–3569, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019, 2019
Short summary
Revised treatment of wet scavenging processes dramatically improves GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 simulations of surface nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium over the United States
Gan Luo, Fangqun Yu, and James Schwab
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3439–3447, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessment of wavelet-based spatial verification by means of a stochastic precipitation model (wv_verif v0.1.0)
Sebastian Buschow, Jakiw Pidstrigach, and Petra Friederichs
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3401–3418, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3401-2019, 2019
Short summary
The Eulerian urban dispersion model EPISODE – Part 2: Extensions to the source dispersion and photochemistry for EPISODE–CityChem v1.2 and its application to the city of Hamburg
Matthias Karl, Sam-Erik Walker, Sverre Solberg, and Martin O. P. Ramacher
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3357–3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3357-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3357-2019, 2019
Short summary
The FireWork v2.0 air quality forecast system with biomass burning emissions from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System v2.03
Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Radenko Pavlovic, Michael D. Moran, Peter Englefield, Dan K. Thompson, Rodrigo Munoz-Alpizar, and Hugo Landry
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3283–3310, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Allen, R. J. and Landuyt, W.: The vertical distribution of black carbon in CMIP5 models: Comparison to observations and the importance of convective transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4808–4835, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021595, 2014. a, b
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, I.: Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) 2013 Annual Report, Tech. rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, available at: http://epa.gov/castnet/javaweb/docs/annual_report_2013.pdf (last access: 9 January 2019), 2015. a
Ames, R. B. and Malm, W. C.: Comparison of sulfate and nitrate particle mass concentrations measured by IMPROVE and the CDN, Atmos. Environ., 35, 905–916, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00369-1, 2001. a, b
Ansmann, A., Petzold, A., Kandler, K., Tegen, I., Wendisch, M., Müller, D., Weinzierl, B., Müller, T., and Heintzenberg, J.: Saharan Mineral Dust Experiments SAMUM-1 and SAMUM-2: what have we learned?, Tellus B, 63, 403–429, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00555.x, 2011. a
Aquila, V.: Global model studies on the distribution and composition of potential atmospheric ice nuclei, Ph.D. thesis, LMU München, Germany, available at: http://elib.dlr.de/61778/1/Aquila-diss-FINAL-20091215.pdf (last access: 9 January 2019), 2009. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The implementation of the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 into the global atmospheric chemistry model EMAC is described and evaluated against an extensive pool of observational data, focusing on aerosol mass and number concentrations, size distributions, composition, and optical properties. EMAC (MADE3) is able to reproduce main aerosol properties reasonably well, in line with the performance of other global aerosol models.
The implementation of the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 into the global atmospheric...
Citation