Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
GMD | Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 879–892, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 879–892, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 05 Mar 2019

Methods for assessment of models | 05 Mar 2019

DCMIP2016: the splitting supercell test case

Colin M. Zarzycki et al.
Related authors  
Regional grid refinement in an Earth system model: impacts on the simulated Greenland surface mass balance
Leonardus van Kampenhout, Alan M. Rhoades, Adam R. Herrington, Colin M. Zarzycki, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, William J. Sacks, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
The Cryosphere, 13, 1547–1564, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1547-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1547-2019, 2019
Short summary
DCMIP2016: a review of non-hydrostatic dynamical core design and intercomparison of participating models
Paul A. Ullrich, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Kevin A. Reed, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Joseph Klemp, Sang-Hun Park, William Skamarock, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Robert Walko, Alex Reinecke, and Kevin Viner
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4477–4509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017, 2017
Short summary
TempestExtremes: a framework for scale-insensitive pointwise feature tracking on unstructured grids
Paul A. Ullrich and Colin M. Zarzycki
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1069–1090, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1069-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1069-2017, 2017
Short summary
Impact of surface coupling grids on tropical cyclone extremes in high-resolution atmospheric simulations
Colin M. Zarzycki, Kevin A. Reed, Julio T. Bacmeister, Anthony P. Craig, Susan C. Bates, and Nan A. Rosenbloom
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 779–788, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-779-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-779-2016, 2016
Short summary
Related subject area  
Numerical Methods
Evaluation of lossless and lossy algorithms for the compression of scientific datasets in netCDF-4 or HDF5 files
Xavier Delaunay, Aurélie Courtois, and Flavien Gouillon
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4099–4113, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4099-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4099-2019, 2019
Short summary
A Model of Black Sea Circulation with Strait Exchange (2008–2018)
Murat Gunduz, Emin Özsoy, and Robinson Hordoir
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-163,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-163, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling for 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success
Richard Scalzo, David Kohn, Hugo Olierook, Gregory Houseman, Rohitash Chandra, Mark Girolami, and Sally Cripps
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2941–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019, 2019
Short summary
LSCE-FFNN-v1: a two-step neural network model for the reconstruction of surface ocean pCO2 over the global ocean
Anna Denvil-Sommer, Marion Gehlen, Mathieu Vrac, and Carlos Mejia
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2091–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2091-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2091-2019, 2019
Short summary
Slate: extending Firedrake's domain-specific abstraction to hybridized solvers for geoscience and beyond
Thomas H. Gibson, Lawrence Mitchell, David A. Ham, and Colin J. Cotter
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-86,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-86, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Cited articles  
Browning, K. A.: Airflow and Precipitation Trajectories Within Severe Local Storms Which Travel to the Right of the Winds, J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 634–639, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO;2, 1964. a
Doswell, C. A. and Burgess, D. W.: Tornadoes and toraadic storms: A review of conceptual models, The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union, 161–172, 1993. a
Gallus, W. A. and Bresch, J. F.: Comparison of Impacts of WRF Dynamic Core, Physics Package, and Initial Conditions on Warm Season Rainfall Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2632–2641, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3198.1, 2006. a, b
Gross, M., Wan, H., Rasch, P. J., Caldwell, P. M., Williamson, D. L., Klocke, D., Jablonowski, C., Thatcher, D. R., Wood, N., Cullen, M., Beare, B., Willett, M., Lemarié, F., Blayo, E., Malardel, S., Termonia, P., Gassmann, A., Lauritzen, P. H., Johansen, H., Zarzycki, C. M., Sakaguchi, K., and Leung, R.: Physics–Dynamics Coupling in Weather, Climate, and Earth System Models: Challenges and Recent Progress, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 3505–3544, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-17-0345.1, 2018. a
Guimond, S. R., Reisner, J. M., Marras, S., and Giraldo, F. X.: The Impacts of Dry Dynamic Cores on Asymmetric Hurricane Intensification, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4661–4684, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0055.1, 2016. a, b
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
We summarize the results of the Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project's idealized supercell test case. Supercells are storm-scale weather phenomena that are a key target for next-generation, non-hydrostatic weather prediction models. We show that the dynamical cores of most global numerical models converge between approximately 1 and 0.5 km grid spacing for this test, although differences in final solution exist, particularly due to differing grid discretizations and numerical diffusion.
We summarize the results of the Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project's idealized...
Citation