Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-139-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-139-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
16 Jan 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 16 Jan 2020

Machine dependence and reproducibility for coupled climate simulations: the HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP Preindustrial simulation

Maria-Vittoria Guarino, Louise C. Sime, David Schroeder, Grenville M. S. Lister, and Rosalyn Hatcher

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Maria Vittoria Guarino on behalf of the Authors (08 Aug 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Aug 2019) by Sophie Valcke
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (15 Oct 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (28 Oct 2019)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (06 Nov 2019) by Sophie Valcke
AR by Maria Vittoria Guarino on behalf of the Authors (29 Nov 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (04 Dec 2019) by Sophie Valcke
Download
Short summary
When the same weather or climate simulation is run on different high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, model outputs may not be identical for a given initial condition. Here, we investigate the behaviour of the Preindustrial simulation prepared by the UK Met Office for the forthcoming CMIP6 under different computing environments. Discrepancies between the means of key climate variables were analysed at different timescales, from decadal to centennial.