Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 6, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 429-443, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-429-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: The community version of the Weather Research and Forecasting...

Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 429-443, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-429-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 03 Apr 2013

Model evaluation paper | 03 Apr 2013

Evaluating a lightning parameterization based on cloud-top height for mesoscale numerical model simulations

J. Wong1, M. C. Barth2, and D. Noone1 J. Wong et al.
  • 1Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0216, USA
  • 2Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA

Abstract. The Price and Rind lightning parameterization based on cloud-top height is a commonly used method for predicting flash rate in global chemistry models. As mesoscale simulations begin to implement flash rate predictions at resolutions that partially resolve convection, it is necessary to validate and understand the behavior of this method within such a regime. In this study, we tested the flash rate parameterization, intra-cloud/cloud-to-ground (IC:CG) partitioning parameterization, and the associated resolution dependency "calibration factor" by Price and Rind using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model running at 36 km, 12 km, and 4 km grid spacings within the continental United States. Our results show that while the integrated flash count is consistent with observations when model biases in convection are taken into account, an erroneous frequency distribution is simulated. When the spectral characteristics of lightning flash rate are a concern, we recommend the use of prescribed IC:CG values. In addition, using cloud-top from convective parameterization, the "calibration factor" is also shown to be insufficient in reconciling the resolution dependency at the tested grid spacing used in this study. We recommend scaling by areal ratio relative to a base-case grid spacing determined by convective core density.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share