Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1729-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1729-2015
Model experiment description paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
11 Jun 2015
Model experiment description paper | Highlight paper |  | 11 Jun 2015

A large-scale simulation model to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean

A. Hartmann, T. Gleeson, R. Rosolem, F. Pianosi, Y. Wada, and T. Wagener

Related authors

Performance assessment of geospatial and time series features on groundwater level forecasting with deep learning
Mariana Gomez, Maximilian Noelscher, Andreas Hartmann, and Stefan Broda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1836,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1836, 2023
Short summary
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimating karst groundwater recharge from soil moisture observations – a new method tested at the Swabian Alb, southwest Germany
Romane Berthelin, Tunde Olarinoye, Michael Rinderer, Matías Mudarra, Dominic Demand, Mirjam Scheller, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 385–400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-385-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Karst spring recession and classification: efficient, automated methods for both fast- and slow-flow components
Tunde Olarinoye, Tom Gleeson, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5431–5447, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022, 2022
Short summary
Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM(ZS) as an example
Yan Liu, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Matías Mudarra, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5341–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2877–2899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
mesas.py v1.0: a flexible Python package for modeling solute transport and transit times using StorAge Selection functions
Ciaran J. Harman and Esther Xu Fei
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 477–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allocca, V., Manna, F., and De Vita, P.: Estimating annual groundwater recharge coefficient for karst aquifers of the southern Apennines (Italy), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 803–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-803-2014, 2014.
Andreo, B., Vías, J., Durán, J., Jiménez, P., López-Geta, J., and Carrasco, F.: Methodology for groundwater recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain, Hydrogeol. J., 16, 911–925, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0274-5, 2008.
Aquilina, L., Ladouche, B., and Doerfliger, N.: Water storage and transfer in the epikarst of karstic systems during high flow periods, J. Hydrol., 327, 472–485, 2006.
Arnell, N. W.: Relative effects of multi-decadal climatic variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due to global warming?: future streamflows in Britain, J. Hydrol., 270, 195–213, 2003.
Aydin, H., Ekmekci, M., and Soylu, M. E.: Characterization and conceptualization of a relict karst aquifer (bilecik , turkey) karakterizacija in konceptualizacija reliktnega, Acta carsologica, 42, 75–92, 2013.
Download
Short summary
We present a new approach to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean. Cluster analysis is used to subdivide all karst regions into four typical karst landscapes and to simulate karst recharge with a process-based karst model. We estimate its parameters by a combination of a priori information and observations of soil moisture and evapotranspiration. Independent observations of recharge that present large-scale models significantly under-estimate karstic recharge.