Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1831-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1831-2015
Development and technical paper
 | 
22 Jun 2015
Development and technical paper |  | 22 Jun 2015

Verifications of the high-resolution numerical model and polarization relations of atmospheric acoustic-gravity waves

N. M. Gavrilov, S. P. Kshevetskii, and A. V. Koval

Related authors

Numerical modelling of relative contribution of planetary waves to the atmospheric circulation
Andrey V. Koval, Olga N. Toptunova, Maxim A. Motsakov, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, and Eugene V. Rozanov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4105–4114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Decay times of atmospheric acoustic–gravity waves after deactivation of wave forcing
Nikolai M. Gavrilov, Sergey P. Kshevetskii, and Andrey V. Koval
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13713–13724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13713-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13713-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modelling the residual mean meridional circulation at different stages of sudden stratospheric warming events
Andrey V. Koval, Wen Chen, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, Alexander I. Pogoreltsev, Olga N. Toptunova, Ke Wei, Anna N. Yarusova, and Anton S. Zarubin
Ann. Geophys., 39, 357–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-357-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-357-2021, 2021
Short summary
Correct boundary conditions for DNS models of nonlinear acoustic-gravity waves forced by atmospheric pressure variations
Yuliya Kurdyaeva, Sergey Kshevetskii, Nikolay Gavrilov, and Sergey Kulichkov
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-76,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-76, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Comparisons of CH4 ground-based FTIR measurements near Saint Petersburg with GOSAT observations
N. M. Gavrilov, M. V. Makarova, A. V. Poberovskii, and Yu. M. Timofeyev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1003–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1003-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1003-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Estimation of CH4 emission based on an advanced 4D-LETKF assimilation system
Jagat S. H. Bisht, Prabir K. Patra, Masayuki Takigawa, Takashi Sekiya, Yugo Kanaya, Naoko Saitoh, and Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1823–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Accelerated estimation of sea-spray-mediated heat flux using Gaussian quadrature: case studies with a coupled CFSv2.0-WW3 system
Ruizi Shi and Fanghua Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1839–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1839-2023, 2023
Short summary
AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation
Forwood Wiser, Bryan K. Place, Siddhartha Sen, Havala O. T. Pye, Benjamin Yang, Daniel M. Westervelt, Daven K. Henze, Arlene M. Fiore, and V. Faye McNeill
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1801–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, 2023
Short summary
A method for generating a quasi-linear convective system suitable for observing system simulation experiments
Jonathan D. Labriola, Jeremy A. Gibbs, and Louis J. Wicker
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1779–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1779-2023, 2023
Short summary
The second Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land configuration, RAL2
Mike Bush, Ian Boutle, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Charmaine Franklin, Kirsty Hanley, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Huw Lewis, Adrian Lock, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Belinda Roux, Stuart Webster, and Mark Weeks
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1713–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreassen, O., Hvidsten, O., Fritts, D., and Arendt, S.: Vorticity dynamics in a breaking internal gravity wave. Part 1. Initial instability evolution, J. Fluid. Mech., 367, 27–46, 1998.
Baker, D. and Schubert, G.: Convectively generated internal gravity waves in the lower atmosphere of Venus. Part II: mean wind shear and wave-mean flow interaction, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 200–215, 2000.
Beer, T.: Atmospheric waves, Adam Hilder, London, 1974.
Fritts, D. C. and Alexander, M. J.: Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RG000106, 2003.
Fritts, D. C. and Garten, J. F.: Wave breaking and transition to turbulence in stratified shear flows, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1057–1085, 1996.
Download
Short summary
We performed high-resolution numerical simulations of nonlinear acoustic-gravity waves (AGWs) at altitudes 0–500km and compared them with analytical polarization relations of linear AGW theory. After some transition time, t > te, the numbers of numerically simulated and analytical pairs of AGW parameters, which are equal to confidence 95%, are larger at altitudes 30-60km and are smaller at t < te. The differences reveal circumstances where numerical simulations of waves are required.