Articles | Volume 8, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2329-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2329-2015
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
31 Jul 2015
Methods for assessment of models |  | 31 Jul 2015

Three-dimensional visualization of ensemble weather forecasts – Part 1: The visualization tool Met.3D (version 1.0)

M. Rautenhaus, M. Kern, A. Schäfler, and R. Westermann

Related authors

The effect of lossy compression of numerical weather prediction data on data analysis: a case study using enstools-compression 2023.11
Oriol Tintó Prims, Robert Redl, Mark Rautenhaus, Tobias Selz, Takumi Matsunobu, Kameswar Rao Modali, and George Craig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753, 2024
Short summary
An objective identification technique for potential vorticity structures associated with African Easterly Waves
Christoph Fischer, Andreas H. Fink, Elmar Schömer, Marc Rautenhaus, and Michael Riemer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-218,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-218, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Visual analysis of model parameter sensitivities along warm conveyor belt trajectories using Met.3D (1.6.0-multivar1)
Christoph Neuhauser, Maicon Hieronymus, Michael Kern, Marc Rautenhaus, Annika Oertel, and Rüdiger Westermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4617–4638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023, 2023
Short summary
The three-dimensional structure of fronts in mid-latitude weather systems in numerical weather prediction models
Andreas A. Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Tim Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4427–4450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, 2023
Short summary
The three-dimensional structure of fronts in mid-latitude weather systems as represented by numerical weather prediction models
Andreas Alexander Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Timothy Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modelling wind farm effects in HARMONIE–AROME (cycle 43.2.2) – Part 1: Implementation and evaluation
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for dry and moist baroclinic waves in the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (CY43R3)
Clément Bouvier, Daan van den Broek, Madeleine Ekblom, and Victoria A. Sinclair
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2961–2986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Challenges of constructing and selecting the “perfect” boundary conditions for the large-eddy simulation model PALM
Jelena Radović, Michal Belda, Jaroslav Resler, Kryštof Eben, Martin Bureš, Jan Geletič, Pavel Krč, Hynek Řezníček, and Vladimír Fuka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2901–2927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2901-2024, 2024
Short summary
A machine learning approach for evaluating Southern Ocean cloud radiative biases in a global atmosphere model
Sonya L. Fiddes, Marc D. Mallet, Alain Protat, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Simon P. Alexander, and Kalli Furtado
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2641–2662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Decision Support System version 1.0 (DSS v1.0) for air quality management in Delhi, India
Gaurav Govardhan, Sachin D. Ghude, Rajesh Kumar, Sumit Sharma, Preeti Gunwani, Chinmay Jena, Prafull Yadav, Shubhangi Ingle, Sreyashi Debnath, Pooja Pawar, Prodip Acharja, Rajmal Jat, Gayatry Kalita, Rupal Ambulkar, Santosh Kulkarni, Akshara Kaginalkar, Vijay K. Soni, Ravi S. Nanjundiah, and Madhavan Rajeevan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2617–2640, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2617-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abram, G. and Treinish, L.: An Extended Data-Flow Architecture for Data Analysis and Visualization, in: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Visualization '95, VIS '95, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
Alpert, J. C.: 3-dimensional animated displays for sifting out medium range weather events, in: 19th Conference on IIPS, 9–13 February 2003, Long Beach, California, 2003.
Bailey, M.: Using GPU shaders for visualization, IEEE Comput. Graph., 29, 96–100, 2009.
Bailey, M.: Using GPU shaders for visualization, Part 2, IEEE Comput. Graph., 31, 67–73, 2011.
Bailey, M.: Using GPU shaders for visualization, Part 3, IEEE Comput. Graph., 33, 5–11, 2013.
Short summary
This article presents "Met.3D", a new open-source tool for the interactive 3D visualization of numerical ensemble weather predictions. Met.3D builds a bridge from proven 2D visualization methods commonly used in meteorology to 3D visualization and implements approaches to using the ensemble to allow the user to assess forecast uncertainty. The article is the first part of a two-paper study discussing how 3D and ensemble visualization can be used in a meaningful way suited to weather forecasting.