Articles | Volume 8, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015
Development and technical paper
 | 
19 Nov 2015
Development and technical paper |  | 19 Nov 2015

Updating sea spray aerosol emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2

B. Gantt, J. T. Kelly, and J. O. Bash

Related authors

Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor
Karoline K. Barkjohn, Brett Gantt, and Andrea L. Clements
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of halogen chemistry on summertime air quality in coastal and continental Europe: application of the CMAQ model and implications for regulation
Qinyi Li, Rafael Borge, Golam Sarwar, David de la Paz, Brett Gantt, Jessica Domingo, Carlos A. Cuevas, and Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15321–15337, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15321-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15321-2019, 2019
Short summary
Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1
K. Wyat Appel, Sergey L. Napelenok, Kristen M. Foley, Havala O. T. Pye, Christian Hogrefe, Deborah J. Luecken, Jesse O. Bash, Shawn J. Roselle, Jonathan E. Pleim, Hosein Foroutan, William T. Hutzell, George A. Pouliot, Golam Sarwar, Kathleen M. Fahey, Brett Gantt, Robert C. Gilliam, Nicholas K. Heath, Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Donna B. Schwede, Tanya L. Spero, David C. Wong, and Jeffrey O. Young
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1703–1732, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017, 2017
Short summary
Implementing marine organic aerosols into the GEOS-Chem model
B. Gantt, M. S. Johnson, M. Crippa, A. S. H. Prévôt, and N. Meskhidze
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 619–629, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-619-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-619-2015, 2015
Incorporation of advanced aerosol activation treatments into CESM/CAM5: model evaluation and impacts on aerosol indirect effects
B. Gantt, J. He, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and A. Nenes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7485–7497, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7485-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7485-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modeling below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles in GEM-MACHv3.1
Roya Ghahreman, Wanmin Gong, Paul A. Makar, Alexandru Lupu, Amanda Cole, Kulbir Banwait, Colin Lee, and Ayodeji Akingunola
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 685–707, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution
Daisuke Goto, Tatsuya Seiki, Kentaroh Suzuki, Hisashi Yashiro, and Toshihiko Takemura
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 651–684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of air quality model responses to emission changes: comparison of results based on four EU inventories through FAIRMODE benchmarking methodology
Alexander de Meij, Cornelis Cuvelier, Philippe Thunis, Enrico Pisoni, and Bertrand Bessagnet
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 587–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-587-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-587-2024, 2024
Short summary
A simple and realistic aerosol emission approach for use in the Thompson–Eidhammer microphysics scheme in the NOAA UFS Weather Model (version GSL global-24Feb2022)
Haiqin Li, Georg A. Grell, Ravan Ahmadov, Li Zhang, Shan Sun, Jordan Schnell, and Ning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 607–619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-607-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-607-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the formation of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in chemical transport models: an evaluation of the WRF-CHIMERE (v2020r2) model with a focus over the Finnish boreal forest
Giancarlo Ciarelli, Sara Tahvonen, Arineh Cholakian, Manuel Bettineschi, Bruno Vitali, Tuukka Petäjä, and Federico Bianchi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 545–565, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-545-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-545-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreas, L. E.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 ms−1 , J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184, 1998.
Archer-Nicholls, S., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., Allan, J., Zaveri, R. A., Fast, J. D., Hodnebrog, Ø., Denier van der Gon, H., and McFiggans, G.: Gaseous chemistry and aerosol mechanism developments for version 3.5.1 of the online regional model, WRF-Chem, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2557–2579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014, 2014.
Arnold, J. R., Hartsell, B. E., Luke, W. T., Ullah, S. M. R., Dasgupta, P. K., Huey, L. G., and Tate, P.: Field test of four methods for gas-phase ambient nitric acid, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4210–4226, 2007.
Atkeson, T., Greening, H., and Poor, N.: Bay Region Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE), Atmos. Environ., 41, 4163–4164, 2007.
Baker, K. R., Misenis, C., Obland, M. D., Ferrare, R. A., Scarino, A. J., and Kelly, J. T.: Evaluation of surface and upper air fine scale WRF meteorological modeling of the May and June 2010 CalNex period in California, Atmos. Environ., 80, 299–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.006, 2013.
Download