Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year
    4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore
    4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 51 Scimago H
    index 51
Volume 8, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975-1003, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Monitoring atmospheric composition and climate, research in...

Special issue: Coupled chemistry–meteorology modelling: status and...

Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975-1003, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model description paper 07 Apr 2015

Model description paper | 07 Apr 2015

Tropospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF

J. Flemming et al.
Related authors  
Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 45R1) of ECMWF
Samuel Rémy, Zak Kipling, Johannes Flemming, Olivier Boucher, Pierre Nabat, Martine Michou, Alessio Bozzo, Melanie Ades, Vincent Huijnen, Angela Benedetti, Richard Engelen, Vincent-Henri Peuch, and Jean-Jacques Morcrette
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-142,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-142, 2019
Manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign
Sebastian Donner, Jonas Kuhn, Michel Van Roozendael, Alkiviadis Bais, Steffen Beirle, Tim Bösch, Kristof Bognar, Ilya Bruchkousky, Ka Lok Chan, Theano Drosoglou, Caroline Fayt, Udo Frieß, François Hendrick, Christian Hermans, Junli Jin, Ang Li, Jianzhong Ma, Enno Peters, Gaia Pinardi, Andreas Richter, Stefan F. Schreier, André Seyler, Kimberly Strong, Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Yang Wang, Pinhua Xie, Jin Xu, Xiaoyi Zhao, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-115,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-115, 2019
Manuscript under review for AMT
Short summary
Modelling CO2 weather – why horizontal resolution matters
Anna Agustí-Panareda, Michail Diamantakis, Sébastien Massart, Frédéric Chevallier, Joaquín Muñoz-Sabater, Jérôme Barré, Roger Curcoll, Richard Engelen, Bavo Langerock, Rachel M. Law, Zoë Loh, Josep Anton Morguí, Mark Parrington, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Michel Ramonet, Coleen Roehl, Alex T. Vermeulen, Thorsten Warneke, and Debra Wunch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7347-7376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019, 2019
Short summary
First high-resolution BrO column retrievals from TROPOMI
Sora Seo, Andreas Richter, Anne-Marlene Blechschmidt, Ilias Bougoudis, and John Philip Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2913-2932, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2913-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2913-2019, 2019
Short summary
Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV-Visible spectrometers during the CINDI-2 campaign
Karin Kreher, Michel Van Roozendael, Francois Hendrick, Arnoud Apituley, Ermioni Dimitropoulou, Udo Frieß, Andreas Richter, Thomas Wagner, Nader Abuhassan, Li Ang, Monica Anguas, Alkis Bais, Nuria Benavent, Tim Bösch, Kristof Bognar, Alexander Borovski, Ilya Bruchkouski, Alexander Cede, Ka L. Chan, Sebastian Donner, Theano Drosoglou, Caroline Fayt, Henning Finkenzeller, David Garcia-Nieto, Clio Gielen, Laura Gómez-Martín, Nan Hao, Jay R. Herman, Christian Hermans, Syedul Hoque, Hitoshi Irie, Junli Jin, Paul Johnston, Junaid Khayyam Butt, Fahim Khokhar, Theodore K. Koenig, Jonas Kuhn, Vinod Kumar, Johannes Lampel, Cheng Liu, Jianzhong Ma, Alexis Merlaud, Abhishek K. Mishra, Moritz Müller, Monica Navarro-Comas, Mareike Ostendorf, Andrea Pazmino, Enno Peters, Gaia Pinardi, Manuel Pinharanda, Ankie Piters, Ulrich Platt, Oleg Postylyakov, Cristina Prados-Roman, Olga Puentedura, Richard Querel, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Anja Schönhardt, Stefan F. Schreier, Andre Seyler, Vinayak Sinha, Elena Spinei, Kimberly Strong, Frederik Tack, Xin Tian, Martin Tiefengraber, Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Jeron van Gent, Rainer Volkamer, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Shanshan Wang, Zhuoru Wang, Mark Wenig, Folkard Wittrock, Pinhua H. Xie, Jin Xu, Margarita Yela, Chengxin Zhang, and Xiaoyi Zhao
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-157,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-157, 2019
Manuscript under review for AMT
Short summary
Related subject area  
Atmospheric Sciences
Chemistry and deposition in the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTE v1.1) – Part 1: Chemical mechanism
Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, and Jozef Peeters
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2307-2356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019, 2019
Short summary
The Matsuno baroclinic wave test case
Ofer Shamir, Itamar Yacoby, Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, and Nathan Paldor
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2181-2193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2181-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2181-2019, 2019
Short summary
Development and evaluation of pollen source methodologies for the Victorian Grass Pollen Emissions Module VGPEM1.0
Kathryn M. Emmerson, Jeremy D. Silver, Edward Newbigin, Edwin R. Lampugnani, Cenk Suphioglu, Alan Wain, and Elizabeth Ebert
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2195-2214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2195-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2195-2019, 2019
Short summary
Convective response to large-scale forcing in the tropical western Pacific simulated by spCAM5 and CanAM4.3
Toni Mitovski, Jason N. S. Cole, Norman A. McFarlane, Knut von Salzen, and Guang J. Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2107-2117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2107-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2107-2019, 2019
Short summary
Atmospheric boundary layer dynamics from balloon soundings worldwide: CLASS4GL v1.0
Hendrik Wouters, Irina Y. Petrova, Chiel C. van Heerwaarden, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Adriaan J. Teuling, Vicky Meulenberg, Joseph A. Santanello, and Diego G. Miralles
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2139-2153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2139-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2139-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Archibald, A. T., Cooke, M. C., Utembe, S. R., Shallcross, D. E., Derwent, R. G., and Jenkin, M. E.: Impacts of mechanistic changes on HOx formation and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8097–8118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8097-2010, 2010.
Arnold, S. R., Emmons, L. K., Monks, S. A., Law, K. S., Ridley, D. A., Turquety, S., Tilmes, S., Thomas, J. L., Bouarar, I., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Mao, J., Duncan, B. N., Steenrod, S., Yoshida, Y., Langner, J., and Long, Y.: Biomass burning influence on high latitude tropospheric ozone and reactive nitrogen in summer 2008: a multi-model analysis based on POLMIP simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 24573–24621, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-24573-2014, 2014.
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I – gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1461–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004, 2004.
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II – gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006, 2006.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We describe modules for atmospheric chemistry, wet and dry deposition and lightning NO production, which have been newly introduced in ECMWF's weather forecasting model. With that model, we want to forecast global air pollution as part of the European Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service. We show that the new model results compare as well or better with in situ and satellite observations of ozone, CO, NO2, SO2 and formaldehyde as the previous model.
We describe modules for atmospheric chemistry, wet and dry deposition and lightning NO...
Citation