Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 9, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1219-1241, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1219-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1219-1241, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1219-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model description paper 01 Apr 2016

Model description paper | 01 Apr 2016

Discrete-Element bonded-particle Sea Ice model DESIgn, version 1.3a – model description and implementation

Agnieszka Herman
Related authors  
Floe-size distributions in laboratory ice broken by waves
Agnieszka Herman, Karl-Ulrich Evers, and Nils Reimer
The Cryosphere, 12, 685-699, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-685-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-685-2018, 2018
Short summary
Wave-induced stress and breaking of sea ice in a coupled hydrodynamic discrete-element wave–ice model
Agnieszka Herman
The Cryosphere, 11, 2711-2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2711-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2711-2017, 2017
Short summary
Variability of sea ice deformation rates in the Arctic and their relationship with basin-scale wind forcing
A. Herman and O. Glowacki
The Cryosphere, 6, 1553-1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1553-2012,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1553-2012, 2012
Related subject area  
Cryosphere
ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks
Gerhard Krinner, Chris Derksen, Richard Essery, Mark Flanner, Stefan Hagemann, Martyn Clark, Alex Hall, Helmut Rott, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Hyungjun Kim, Cécile B. Ménard, Lawrence Mudryk, Chad Thackeray, Libo Wang, Gabriele Arduini, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Paul Bartlett, Julia Boike, Aaron Boone, Frédérique Chéruy, Jeanne Colin, Matthias Cuntz, Yongjiu Dai, Bertrand Decharme, Jeff Derry, Agnès Ducharne, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Charles Fierz, Josephine Ghattas, Yeugeniy Gusev, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Matthieu Lafaysse, Rachel Law, Dave Lawrence, Weiping Li, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Martin Ménégoz, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, Masashi Niwano, John Pomeroy, Mark S. Raleigh, Gerd Schaedler, Vladimir Semenov, Tanya G. Smirnova, Tobias Stacke, Ulrich Strasser, Sean Svenson, Dmitry Turkov, Tao Wang, Nander Wever, Hua Yuan, Wenyan Zhou, and Dan Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5027-5049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018, 2018
Short summary
The GRISLI ice sheet model (version 2.0): calibration and validation for multi-millennial changes of the Antarctic ice sheet
Aurélien Quiquet, Christophe Dumas, Catherine Ritz, Vincent Peyaud, and Didier M. Roche
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5003-5025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5003-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5003-2018, 2018
Short summary
CVPM 1.1: a flexible heat-transfer modeling system for permafrost
Gary D. Clow
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4889-4908, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4889-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4889-2018, 2018
Short summary
Dynamically coupling full Stokes and shallow shelf approximation for marine ice sheet flow using Elmer/Ice (v8.3)
Eef C. H. van Dongen, Nina Kirchner, Martin B. van Gijzen, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Thomas Zwinger, Gong Cheng, Per Lötstedt, and Lina von Sydow
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4563-4576, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4563-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4563-2018, 2018
Short summary
The NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM) v1.0: initial model development and analysis
Alek A. Petty, Melinda Webster, Linette Boisvert, and Thorsten Markus
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4577-4602, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4577-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4577-2018, 2018
Cited articles  
Asadi, M., Rasouli, V., and Barla, G.: A bonded particle model simulation of shear strength and asperity degradation for rough rock fractures, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 45, 649–675, 2012.
Asplin, M., Galley, R., Barber, D., and Prinsenberg, S.: Fracture of summer perennial sea ice by ocean swell as a result of Arctic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C06025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007221, 2012.
Asplin, M., Scharien, R., Else, B., Howell, S., Barber, D., Papakyriakou, T., and Prinsenberg, S.: Implications of fractured Arctic perennial ice cover on thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice processes, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 2327–2343, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009557, 2014.
Åström, J. A., Riikilä, T. I., Tallinen, T., Zwinger, T., Benn, D., Moore, J. C., and Timonen, J.: A particle based simulation model for glacier dynamics, The Cryosphere, 7, 1591–1602, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1591-2013, 2013.
Bahaaddini, M., Sharrock, G., and Hebblewhite, B.: Numerical investigation of the effect of joint geometrical parameters on the mechanical properties of a non-persistent jointed rock mass under uniaxial compression, Comput. Geotech., 49, 206–225, 2013.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Recent developments in observational and modeling techniques allow us to analyze sea ice with increasingly higher resolution. Instead of a continuous ice cover we observe a complex, constantly changing medium composed of interacting floes. Understanding these aspects of sea ice behavior requires new modeling methods, like the Discrete-Element Sea Ice model (DESIgn) in which sea ice is treated as an assemblage of grains that freeze together or break apart in response to wind and ocean currents.
Recent developments in observational and modeling techniques allow us to analyze sea ice with...
Citation
Share