Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 9, issue 5 | Copyright

Special issue: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental...

Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937-1958, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model experiment description paper 26 May 2016

Model experiment description paper | 26 May 2016

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

Veronika Eyring et al.
Related authors
Dynamics and composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone
Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, Hans Schlager, Robert Baumann, Duy Sinh Cai, Veronika Eyring, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, Tina Jurkat-Witschas, Christiane Voigt, Andreas Zahn, and Helmut Ziereis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5655-5675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5655-2018, 2018
Process-level improvements in CMIP5 models and their impact on tropical variability, the Southern Ocean, and monsoons
Axel Lauer, Colin Jones, Veronika Eyring, Martin Evaldsson, Stefan Hagemann, Jarmo Mäkelä, Gill Martin, Romain Roehrig, and Shiyu Wang
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 33-67, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-33-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-33-2018, 2018
Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: a case study based on aircraft observations and model simulations
Klaus-D. Gottschaldt, Hans Schlager, Robert Baumann, Heiko Bozem, Veronika Eyring, Peter Hoor, Patrick Jöckel, Tina Jurkat, Christiane Voigt, Andreas Zahn, and Helmut Ziereis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6091-6111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017, 2017
AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6
William J. Collins, Jean-François Lamarque, Michael Schulz, Olivier Boucher, Veronika Eyring, Michaela I. Hegglin, Amanda Maycock, Gunnar Myhre, Michael Prather, Drew Shindell, and Steven J. Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585-607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017, 2017
Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP
Veronika Eyring, Peter J. Gleckler, Christoph Heinze, Ronald J. Stouffer, Karl E. Taylor, V. Balaji, Eric Guilyardi, Sylvie Joussaume, Stephan Kindermann, Bryan N. Lawrence, Gerald A. Meehl, Mattia Righi, and Dean N. Williams
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 813-830, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-813-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-813-2016, 2016
Related subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
sympl (v. 0.4.0) and climt (v. 0.15.3) – towards a flexible framework for building model hierarchies in Python
Joy Merwin Monteiro, Jeremy McGibbon, and Rodrigo Caballero
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3781-3794, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3781-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3781-2018, 2018
Requirements for a global data infrastructure in support of CMIP6
Venkatramani Balaji, Karl E. Taylor, Martin Juckes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Paul J. Durack, Michael Lautenschlager, Chris Blanton, Luca Cinquini, Sébastien Denvil, Mark Elkington, Francesca Guglielmo, Eric Guilyardi, David Hassell, Slava Kharin, Stefan Kindermann, Sergey Nikonov, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Martina Stockhause, Tobias Weigel, and Dean Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3659-3680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018, 2018
Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP
Christopher D. Roberts, Retish Senan, Franco Molteni, Souhail Boussetta, Michael Mayer, and Sarah P. E. Keeley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3681-3712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018, 2018
Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above
Nathan Luke Abraham, Alexander T. Archibald, Paul Cresswell, Sam Cusworth, Mohit Dalvi, David Matthews, Steven Wardle, and Stuart Whitehouse
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3647-3657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018, 2018
FAME (v1.0): a simple module to simulate the effect of planktonic foraminifer species-specific habitat on their oxygen isotopic content
Didier M. Roche, Claire Waelbroeck, Brett Metcalfe, and Thibaut Caley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3587-3603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3587-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3587-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Bony, S., Bellon, G., Klocke, D., Sherwood, S., Fermepin, S., and Denvil, S.: Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 447–451, 2013.
Brasseur, G. and Carlson, D.: Future directions for the World Climate Research Programme, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 96, https://doi.org/10.1029/2015EO033577, 2015.
CMIP Panel: WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), available at: http://www.wcrp-climate.org/index.php/wgcm-cmip/about-cmip, 2016.
Crowley, T. J.: Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years, Science, 289, 270–277, 2000.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
The objective of CMIP is to better understand past, present, and future climate change in a multi-model context. CMIP's increasing importance and scope is a tremendous success story, but the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. In response to these challenges, we have adopted a more federated structure for the sixth phase of CMIP (i.e. CMIP6) and subsequent phases.
The objective of CMIP is to better understand past, present, and future climate change in a...
Citation
Share