Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 9, issue 8 | Copyright
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2893-2908, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2893-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 26 Aug 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 26 Aug 2016

EnKF and 4D-Var data assimilation with chemical transport model BASCOE (version 05.06)

Sergey Skachko et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 1,205 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
777 320 108 1,205 115 137
  • HTML: 777
  • PDF: 320
  • XML: 108
  • Total: 1,205
  • BibTeX: 115
  • EndNote: 137
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 May 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 May 2016)
Cited
Saved (final revised paper)
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)
Discussed (final revised paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 14 Jul 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In the present work, we performed a comparison of two broadly used data assimilation algorithms, 4D-Var and EnKF, applied to a state-of-the-art atmospheric chemistry transport model. The comparison is carried out using carefully calibrated error statistics. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method applied to real-life conditions of a numerical atmospheric chemistry data assimilation.
In the present work, we performed a comparison of two broadly used data assimilation algorithms,...
Citation
Share