Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2925-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2925-2016
Model evaluation paper
 | 
31 Aug 2016
Model evaluation paper |  | 31 Aug 2016

Large-eddy simulation and stochastic modeling of Lagrangian particles for footprint determination in the stable boundary layer

Andrey Glazunov, Üllar Rannik, Victor Stepanenko, Vasily Lykosov, Mikko Auvinen, Timo Vesala, and Ivan Mammarella

Related authors

On dissipation time scales of the basic second-order moments: the effect on the Energy and Flux-Budget (EFB) turbulence closure for stably stratified turbulence
Evgeny Kadantsev, Evgeny Mortikov, Andrey Glazunov, Nathan Kleeorin, and Igor Rogachevskii
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3164,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3164, 2024
Short summary
Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy in stably stratified sheared flows
Sergej Zilitinkevich, Oleg Druzhinin, Andrey Glazunov, Evgeny Kadantsev, Evgeny Mortikov, Iryna Repina, and Yulia Troitskaya
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2489–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2489-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2489-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Diagnosing drivers of PM2.5 simulation biases in China from meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources using an efficient machine learning method
Shuai Wang, Mengyuan Zhang, Yueqi Gao, Peng Wang, Qingyan Fu, and Hongliang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3617–3629, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation and analysis of the Polair3D v1.11 chemical transport model over Quebec
Shoma Yamanouchi, Shayamilla Mahagammulla Gamage, Sara Torbatian, Jad Zalzal, Laura Minet, Audrey Smargiassi, Ying Liu, Ling Liu, Forood Azargoshasbi, Jinwoong Kim, Youngseob Kim, Daniel Yazgi, and Marianne Hatzopoulou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3579–3597, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assimilation of GNSS tropospheric gradients into the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.4.1
Rohith Thundathil, Florian Zus, Galina Dick, and Jens Wickert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3599–3616, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3599-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3599-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identifying atmospheric rivers and their poleward latent heat transport with generalizable neural networks: ARCNNv1
Ankur Mahesh, Travis A. O'Brien, Burlen Loring, Abdelrahman Elbashandy, William Boos, and William D. Collins
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3533-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3533-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing acetone for the GISS ModelE2.1 Earth system model
Alexandra Rivera, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gregory Faluvegi, and Drew Shindell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3487–3505, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3487-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3487-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, P. S.: Measurement of Prandtl number as a function of Richardson number avoiding self-correlation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 131, 345–362, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9376-4, 2009.
Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., and Brewer, W. A.: Turbulent Velocity-Variance Profiles in the Stable Boundary Layer Generated by a Nocturnal Low-Level Jet, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 700–2719, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3776.1, 2006.
Barad, M.: Project Prairie Grass, a field program in diffusion, vol 2. Technical Report Geophysical Research Papers No. 59, TR-58-235(II)m Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Bedford, 209 pp., http://www.jsirwin.com/PGrassVolumeII.pdf, 1958.
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C.: Improved subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulation, Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut., paper 80-1357, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1357, 1980.
Basu, S. and Porté-Agel, F.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence: A Scale-Dependent Dynamic Modeling Approach, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2074–2091, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3734.1, 2006.
Download
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation (LES) and Lagrangian stochastic modeling of passive particle dispersion were applied to the scalar flux footprint determination in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. The footprint functions obtained in LES were compared with the functions calculated with the use of first-order single-particle Lagrangian stochastic models (LSMs) and zeroth-order Lagrangian stochastic models - the random displacement models (RDMs).