Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Volume 9, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3569-3588, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3569-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Data assimilation in carbon/biogeochemical cycles: consistent...

Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3569-3588, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3569-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 04 Oct 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 04 Oct 2016

Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data assimilation system

Natasha MacBean et al.
Related authors  
Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)
Vladislav Bastrikov, Natasha MacBean, Cédric Bacour, Diego Santaren, Sylvain Kuppel, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4739-4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, 2018
Short summary
Gross and net land cover changes in the main plant functional types derived from the annual ESA CCI land cover maps (1992–2015)
Wei Li, Natasha MacBean, Philippe Ciais, Pierre Defourny, Céline Lamarche, Sophie Bontemps, Richard A. Houghton, and Shushi Peng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 219-234, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-219-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-219-2018, 2018
Short summary
Evaluating the effect of alternative carbon allocation schemes in a land surface model (CLM4.5) on carbon fluxes, pools, and turnover in temperate forests
Francesc Montané, Andrew M. Fox, Avelino F. Arellano, Natasha MacBean, M. Ross Alexander, Alex Dye, Daniel A. Bishop, Valerie Trouet, Flurin Babst, Amy E. Hessl, Neil Pederson, Peter D. Blanken, Gil Bohrer, Christopher M. Gough, Marcy E. Litvak, Kimberly A. Novick, Richard P. Phillips, Jeffrey D. Wood, and David J. P. Moore
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3499-3517, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3499-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3499-2017, 2017
Short summary
Using satellite data to improve the leaf phenology of a global terrestrial biosphere model
N. MacBean, F. Maignan, P. Peylin, C. Bacour, F.-M. Bréon, and P. Ciais
Biogeosciences, 12, 7185-7208, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7185-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7185-2015, 2015
Short summary
Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change Initiative
B. Poulter, N. MacBean, A. Hartley, I. Khlystova, O. Arino, R. Betts, S. Bontemps, M. Boettcher, C. Brockmann, P. Defourny, S. Hagemann, M. Herold, G. Kirches, C. Lamarche, D. Lederer, C. Ottlé, M. Peters, and P. Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315-2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, 2015
Short summary
Related subject area  
Biogeosciences
Representation of fire, land-use change and vegetation dynamics in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator vn4.9 (JULES)
Chantelle Burton, Richard Betts, Manoel Cardoso, Ted R. Feldpausch, Anna Harper, Chris D. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 179-193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-179-2019, 2019
Short summary
Analysis fire patterns and drivers with a global SEVER-FIRE v1.0 model incorporated into dynamic global vegetation model and satellite and on-ground observations
Sergey Venevsky, Yannick Le Page, José M. C. Pereira, and Chao Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 89-110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-89-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-89-2019, 2019
Short summary
A generic pixel-to-point comparison for simulated large-scale ecosystem properties and ground-based observations: an example from the Amazon region
Anja Rammig, Jens Heinke, Florian Hofhansl, Hans Verbeeck, Timothy R. Baker, Bradley Christoffersen, Philippe Ciais, Hannes De Deurwaerder, Katrin Fleischer, David Galbraith, Matthieu Guimberteau, Andreas Huth, Michelle Johnson, Bart Krujit, Fanny Langerwisch, Patrick Meir, Phillip Papastefanou, Gilvan Sampaio, Kirsten Thonicke, Celso von Randow, Christian Zang, and Edna Rödig
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5203-5215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5203-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5203-2018, 2018
Short summary
Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)
Vladislav Bastrikov, Natasha MacBean, Cédric Bacour, Diego Santaren, Sylvain Kuppel, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4739-4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, 2018
Short summary
Modeling the effects of litter stoichiometry and soil mineral N availability on soil organic matter formation using CENTURY-CUE (v1.0)
Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Stefano Manzoni, Philippe Ciais, Bertrand Guenet, and Yuanyuan Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4779-4796, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4779-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4779-2018, 2018
Short summary
Cited articles  
Alton, P. B.: From site-level to global simulation: Reconciling carbon, water and energy fluxes over different spatial scales using a process-based ecophysiological land-surface model, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 176, 111–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.010, 2013.
Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Kidston, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Jones, C., Jung, M., Myneni, R., and Zhu, Z.: Evaluating the land and ocean components of the global carbon cycle in the CMIP5 earth system models, J. Climate, 26, 6801–6843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1, 2013.
Bacour, C., Peylin, P., MacBean, N., Rayner, P. J., Delage, F., Chevallier, F., Weiss, M., Demarty, J., Santaren, D., Baret, F., Berveiller, D., Dufrêne, E., and Prunet, P.: Joint assimilation of eddy covariance flux measurements and FAPAR products over temperate forests within a process-oriented biosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1839–1857, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG002966, 2015.
Barrett, D. J., Hill, M. J., Hutley, L. B., Beringer, J., Xu, J. H., Cook, G. D., and Williams, R. J.: Prospects for improving savanna biophysical models by using multiple-constraints model-data assimilation methods, Aust. J. Botany, 53, 689–714, 2005.
Bloom, A. A. and Williams, M.: Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a data-limited world: integrating ecological “common sense” in a model-data fusion framework, Biogeosciences, 12, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015, 2015.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
Model projections of the response of the terrestrial biosphere to anthropogenic emissions are uncertain, in part due to unknown fixed parameters in a model. Data assimilation can address this by using observations to optimise these parameter values. Using multiple types of data is beneficial for constraining different model processes, but it can also pose challenges in a DA context. This paper demonstrates and discusses the issues involved using toy models and examples from existing literature.
Model projections of the response of the terrestrial biosphere to anthropogenic emissions are...
Citation
Share