Journal cover
Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
- Imprint
- Data protection
- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For editors and referees
- EGU publications
- Imprint
- Data protection
Journal metrics
Journal metrics
IF 4.252
CiteScore 4.49
SNIP 1.539
SJR 2.404
h5-index 40
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexed
Volume 9, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 383-392, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-383-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-383-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 383-392, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-383-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-383-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models 29 Jan 2016
Methods for assessment of models | 29 Jan 2016
Distributed visualization of gridded geophysical data: the Carbon Data Explorer, version 0.2.3
K. A. Endsley and M. G. BillmireRelated subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
Evaluation of iterative Kalman smoother schemes for multi-decadal past climate analysis with comprehensive Earth system models
ORCHIDEE-ROUTING: revising the river routing scheme using a high-resolution hydrological database
Evaluation of the atmosphere–land–ocean–sea ice interface processes in the Regional Arctic System Model version 1 (RASM1) using local and globally gridded observations
The Indian summer monsoon in MetUM-GOML2.0: effects of air–sea coupling and resolution
Interactive ocean bathymetry and coastlines for simulating the last deglaciation with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM-v1.2)
Application of HadCM3@Bristolv1.0 simulations of paleoclimate as forcing for an ice-sheet model, ANICE2.1: set-up and benchmark experiments
Regional Climate Model Evaluation System powered by Apache Open Climate Workbench v1.3.0: an enabling tool for facilitating regional climate studies
Dynamic hydrological discharge modelling for coupled climate model simulations of the last glacial cycle: the MPI-DynamicHD model version 3.0
BGC-val: a model- and grid-independent Python toolkit to evaluate marine biogeochemical models
An EC-Earth coupled atmosphere–ocean single-column model (AOSCM.v1_EC-Earth3) for studying coupled marine and polar processes
Development and evaluation of a variably saturated flow model in the global E3SM Land Model (ELM) version 1.0
Compact Modeling Framework v3.0 for high-resolution global ocean–ice–atmosphere models
A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo
LCice 1.0 – a generalized Ice Sheet System Model coupler for LOVECLIM version 1.3: description, sensitivities, and validation with the Glacial Systems Model (GSM version D2017.aug17)
An ensemble of AMIP simulations with prescribed land surface temperatures
sympl (v. 0.4.0) and climt (v. 0.15.3) – towards a flexible framework for building model hierarchies in Python
Requirements for a global data infrastructure in support of CMIP6
Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP
Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above
FAME (v1.0): a simple module to simulate the effect of planktonic foraminifer species-specific habitat on their oxygen isotopic content
C-Coupler2: a flexible and user-friendly community coupler for model coupling and nesting
Closing the energy balance using a canopy heat capacity and storage concept – a physically based approach for the land component JSBACHv3.11
Portable multi- and many-core performance for finite-difference or finite-element codes – application to the free-surface component of NEMO (NEMOLite2D 1.0)
The microscale obstacle-resolving meteorological model MITRAS v2.0: model theory
Simulation of the performance and scalability of message passing interface (MPI) communications of atmospheric models running on exascale supercomputers
Baseline evaluation of the impact of updates to the MIT Earth System Model on its model parameter estimates
Implementing northern peatlands in a global land surface model: description and evaluation in the ORCHIDEE high-latitude version model (ORC-HL-PEAT)
Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0
UK Global Ocean GO6 and GO7: a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions
Fast sensitivity analysis methods for computationally expensive models with multi-dimensional output
The importance of considering sub-grid cloud variability when using satellite observations to evaluate the cloud and precipitation simulations in climate models
A new version of the CABLE land surface model (Subversion revision r4601) incorporating land use and land cover change, woody vegetation demography, and a novel optimisation-based approach to plant coordination of photosynthesis
The NUIST Earth System Model (NESM) version 3: description and preliminary evaluation
Vegetation distribution and terrestrial carbon cycle in a carbon cycle configuration of JULES4.6 with new plant functional types
OMEN-SED 1.0: a novel, numerically efficient organic matter sediment diagenesis module for coupling to Earth system models
Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0
Comparison of spatial downscaling methods of general circulation model results to study climate variability during the Last Glacial Maximum
The seasonal relationship between intraseasonal tropical variability and ENSO in CMIP5
A new approach for simulating the paleo-evolution of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets
TAMSAT-ALERT v1: a new framework for agricultural decision support
FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model
Computing Climate-Smart Urban Land Use with the Integrated Urban Complexity Model (IUCm 1.0)
A new region-aware bias-correction method for simulated precipitation in areas of complex orography
ORCHIDEE-MICT-BIOENERGY: an attempt to represent the production of lignocellulosic crops for bioenergy in a global vegetation model
Exploring coral reef responses to millennial-scale climatic forcings: insights from the 1-D numerical tool pyReef-Core v1.0
An advanced method of contributing emissions to short-lived chemical species (OH and HO2): the TAGGING 1.1 submodel based on the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy 2.53)
Modeling soil CO2 production and transport with dynamic source and diffusion terms: testing the steady-state assumption using DETECT v1.0
The Bern Simple Climate Model (BernSCM) v1.0: an extensible and fully documented open-source re-implementation of the Bern reduced-form model for global carbon cycle–climate simulations
Crossing the chasm: how to develop weather and climate models for next generation computers?
Interannual rainfall variability over China in the MetUM GA6 and GC2 configurations
Javier García-Pintado and André Paul
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5051-5084, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5051-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5051-2018, 2018
Short summary
Trung Nguyen-Quang, Jan Polcher, Agnès Ducharne, Thomas Arsouze, Xudong Zhou, Ana Schneider, and Lluís Fita
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4965-4985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4965-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4965-2018, 2018
Short summary
Michael A. Brunke, John J. Cassano, Nicholas Dawson, Alice K. DuVivier, William J. Gutowski Jr., Joseph Hamman, Wieslaw Maslowski, Bart Nijssen, J. E. Jack Reeves Eyre, José C. Renteria, Andrew Roberts, and Xubin Zeng
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4817-4841, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4817-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4817-2018, 2018
Short summary
Simon C. Peatman and Nicholas P. Klingaman
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4693-4709, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4693-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4693-2018, 2018
Short summary
Virna Loana Meccia and Uwe Mikolajewicz
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4677-4692, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4677-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4677-2018, 2018
Constantijn J. Berends, Bas de Boer, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4657-4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4657-2018, 2018
Short summary
Huikyo Lee, Alexander Goodman, Lewis McGibbney, Duane E. Waliser, Jinwon Kim, Paul C. Loikith, Peter B. Gibson, and Elias C. Massoud
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4435-4449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4435-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4435-2018, 2018
Short summary
Thomas Riddick, Victor Brovkin, Stefan Hagemann, and Uwe Mikolajewicz
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4291-4316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018, 2018
Short summary
Lee de Mora, Andrew Yool, Julien Palmieri, Alistair Sellar, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekaterina Popova, Colin Jones, and J. Icarus Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4215-4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4215-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4215-2018, 2018
Short summary
Kerstin Hartung, Gunilla Svensson, Hamish Struthers, Anna-Lena Deppenmeier, and Wilco Hazeleger
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4117-4137, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4117-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4117-2018, 2018
Short summary
Gautam Bisht, William J. Riley, Glenn E. Hammond, and David M. Lorenzetti
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4085-4102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4085-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4085-2018, 2018
Short summary
Vladimir V. Kalmykov, Rashit A. Ibrayev, Maxim N. Kaurkin, and Konstantin V. Ushakov
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3983-3997, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3983-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3983-2018, 2018
Short summary
Alf Kirkevåg, Alf Grini, Dirk Olivié, Øyvind Seland, Kari Alterskjær, Matthias Hummel, Inger H. H. Karset, Anna Lewinschal, Xiaohong Liu, Risto Makkonen, Ingo Bethke, Jan Griesfeller, Michael Schulz, and Trond Iversen
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3945-3982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018, 2018
Short summary
Taimaz Bahadory and Lev Tarasov
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3883-3902, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3883-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3883-2018, 2018
Short summary
Duncan Ackerley, Robin Chadwick, Dietmar Dommenget, and Paola Petrelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3865-3881, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3865-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3865-2018, 2018
Short summary
Joy Merwin Monteiro, Jeremy McGibbon, and Rodrigo Caballero
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3781-3794, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3781-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3781-2018, 2018
Short summary
Venkatramani Balaji, Karl E. Taylor, Martin Juckes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Paul J. Durack, Michael Lautenschlager, Chris Blanton, Luca Cinquini, Sébastien Denvil, Mark Elkington, Francesca Guglielmo, Eric Guilyardi, David Hassell, Slava Kharin, Stefan Kindermann, Sergey Nikonov, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Martina Stockhause, Tobias Weigel, and Dean Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3659-3680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018, 2018
Short summary
Christopher D. Roberts, Retish Senan, Franco Molteni, Souhail Boussetta, Michael Mayer, and Sarah P. E. Keeley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3681-3712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018, 2018
Short summary
Nathan Luke Abraham, Alexander T. Archibald, Paul Cresswell, Sam Cusworth, Mohit Dalvi, David Matthews, Steven Wardle, and Stuart Whitehouse
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3647-3657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018, 2018
Short summary
Didier M. Roche, Claire Waelbroeck, Brett Metcalfe, and Thibaut Caley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3587-3603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3587-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3587-2018, 2018
Short summary
Li Liu, Cheng Zhang, Ruizhe Li, Bin Wang, and Guangwen Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3557-3586, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3557-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3557-2018, 2018
Short summary
Marvin Heidkamp, Andreas Chlond, and Felix Ament
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3465-3479, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3465-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3465-2018, 2018
Short summary
Andrew R. Porter, Jeremy Appleyard, Mike Ashworth, Rupert W. Ford, Jason Holt, Hedong Liu, and Graham D. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3447-3464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3447-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3447-2018, 2018
Short summary
Mohamed H. Salim, K. Heinke Schlünzen, David Grawe, Marita Boettcher, Andrea M. U. Gierisch, and Björn H. Fock
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3427-3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3427-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3427-2018, 2018
Short summary
Yongjun Zheng and Philippe Marguinaud
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3409-3426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3409-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3409-2018, 2018
Short summary
Alex G. Libardoni, Chris E. Forest, Andrei P. Sokolov, and Erwan Monier
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3313-3325, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, 2018
Short summary
Chloé Largeron, Gerhard Krinner, Philippe Ciais, and Claire Brutel-Vuilmet
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3279-3297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3279-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3279-2018, 2018
Short summary
Scarlet Stadtler, Thomas Kühn, Sabine Schröder, Domenico Taraborrelli, Martin G. Schultz, and Harri Kokkola
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3235-3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018, 2018
Short summary
David Storkey, Adam T. Blaker, Pierre Mathiot, Alex Megann, Yevgeny Aksenov, Edward W. Blockley, Daley Calvert, Tim Graham, Helene T. Hewitt, Patrick Hyder, Till Kuhlbrodt, Jamie G. L. Rae, and Bablu Sinha
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3187-3213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3187-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3187-2018, 2018
Short summary
Edmund Ryan, Oliver Wild, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Lindsay Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3131-3146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3131-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3131-2018, 2018
Short summary
Hua Song, Zhibo Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Steven Ghan, and Minghuai Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3147-3158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3147-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3147-2018, 2018
Vanessa Haverd, Benjamin Smith, Lars Nieradzik, Peter R. Briggs, William Woodgate, Cathy M. Trudinger, Josep G. Canadell, and Matthias Cuntz
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2995-3026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018, 2018
Short summary
Jian Cao, Bin Wang, Young-Min Yang, Libin Ma, Juan Li, Bo Sun, Yan Bao, Jie He, Xiao Zhou, and Liguang Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2975-2993, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2975-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2975-2018, 2018
Short summary
Anna B. Harper, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Peter M. Cox, Pierre Friedlingstein, Chris D. Jones, Lina M. Mercado, Stephen Sitch, Karina Williams, and Carolina Duran-Rojas
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2857-2873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2857-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2857-2018, 2018
Short summary
Dominik Hülse, Sandra Arndt, Stuart Daines, Pierre Regnier, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2649-2689, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2649-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2649-2018, 2018
Short summary
Timofei Sukhodolov, Jian-Xiong Sheng, Aryeh Feinberg, Bei-Ping Luo, Thomas Peter, Laura Revell, Andrea Stenke, Debra K. Weisenstein, and Eugene Rozanov
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2633-2647, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018, 2018
Short summary
Guillaume Latombe, Ariane Burke, Mathieu Vrac, Guillaume Levavasseur, Christophe Dumas, Masa Kageyama, and Gilles Ramstein
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2563-2579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2563-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2563-2018, 2018
Short summary
Tatiana Matveeva, Daria Gushchina, and Boris Dewitte
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2373-2392, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2373-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2373-2018, 2018
Short summary
Rubén Banderas, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Alexander Robinson, and Marisa Montoya
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2299-2314, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2299-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2299-2018, 2018
Short summary
Dagmawi Asfaw, Emily Black, Matthew Brown, Kathryn Jane Nicklin, Frederick Otu-Larbi, Ewan Pinnington, Andrew Challinor, Ross Maidment, and Tristan Quaife
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2353-2371, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2353-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2353-2018, 2018
Short summary
Christopher J. Smith, Piers M. Forster, Myles Allen, Nicholas Leach, Richard J. Millar, Giovanni A. Passerello, and Leighton A. Regayre
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2273-2297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018, 2018
Short summary
Roger Cremades and Philipp Sommer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-89, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-89, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Juan José Gómez-Navarro, Christoph C. Raible, Denica Bozhinova, Olivia Martius, Juan Andrés García Valero, and Juan Pedro Montávez
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2231-2247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2231-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2231-2018, 2018
Short summary
Wei Li, Chao Yue, Philippe Ciais, Jinfeng Chang, Daniel Goll, Dan Zhu, Shushi Peng, and Albert Jornet-Puig
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2249-2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2249-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2249-2018, 2018
Short summary
Tristan Salles, Jodie Pall, Jody M. Webster, and Belinda Dechnik
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2093-2110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2093-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2093-2018, 2018
Short summary
Vanessa S. Rieger, Mariano Mertens, and Volker Grewe
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2049-2066, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2049-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2049-2018, 2018
Short summary
Edmund M. Ryan, Kiona Ogle, Heather Kropp, Kimberly E. Samuels-Crow, Yolima Carrillo, and Elise Pendall
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1909-1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1909-2018, 2018
Short summary
Kuno M. Strassmann and Fortunat Joos
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1887-1908, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018, 2018
Short summary
Bryan N. Lawrence, Michael Rezny, Reinhard Budich, Peter Bauer, Jörg Behrens, Mick Carter, Willem Deconinck, Rupert Ford, Christopher Maynard, Steven Mullerworth, Carlos Osuna, Andrew Porter, Kim Serradell, Sophie Valcke, Nils Wedi, and Simon Wilson
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1799-1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1799-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1799-2018, 2018
Short summary
Claudia Christine Stephan, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Pier Luigi Vidale, Andrew G. Turner, Marie-Estelle Demory, and Liang Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1823-1847, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1823-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1823-2018, 2018
Short summary
Cited articles
Alder, J. R. and Hostetler, S. W.: Web based visualization of large climate
data sets, Environ. Model. Softw., 68, 175–180,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.016, 2015.
Altintas, I., Berkley, C., Jaeger, E., Jones, M., Ludascher, B., and Mock,
S.: Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific
workflows, in: Proceedings 16th International Conference on Scientific and
Statistical Database Management, 423–424,
https://doi.org/10.1109/SSDM.2004.1311241, 2004.
Blower, J. D., Gemmell, A. L., Griffiths, G. H., Haines, K., Santokhee, A.,
and
Yang, X.: A Web Map Service implementation for the visualization of
multidimensional gridded environmental data, Environ. Model.
Softw., 47, 218–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.04.002, 2013.
Brewer, C. A.: Color Brewer 2.0, available at:
http://www.colorbrewer.org (last access: 24 June 2015),
2014.
Bulka, A.: Transformation Interface Design Pattern, available at:
http://www.andypatterns.com/files/74091232001410AndyBulkaTransformationInterfacePattern.pdf
(last access: 24 June 2015), 2001.
Cornillon, P., Gallagher, J., and Sgouros, T.: OPeNDAP: Accessing data in a
distributed, heterogeneous environment, Data Science Journal, 2, 164–174,
https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.2.164, 2003.
Crockford, D.: JavaScript: The Good Parts, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 1st Edn.,
https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.44.584, Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2008.
Fielding, R. T. and Taylor, R. N.: Principled design of the modern Web
architecture, in: ICSE '00: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference
on Software Engineering, 407–416, https://doi.org/10.1145/337180.337228, 2000.
Jones, E., Oliphant, T. E., and Peterson, P.: SciPy: Open source scientific
tools for Python, available at: http://www.scipy.org/ (last access: 24 June 2015),
2015.
MathWorks: Mat-File Versions, available at:
http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/import_export/mat-file-versions.html
(last access: 9 November 2015), 2015.
Meehl, G. A., Moss, R., Taylor, K. E., Eyring, V., Stouffer, R. J., Bony, S.,
and Stevens, B.: Climate Model Intercomparisons: Preparing for the Next
Phase, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 95, 77–78,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO090001, 2014.
NASA: Data Processing Levels for EOSDIS Data Products,
http://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/earth-science-data/data-processing-levels-for-eosdis-data-products/
(last access: 24 May 2015), 2010.
Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Papeschi, F., Craglia, M., and Ochiai,
O.: Big Data challenges in building the Global Earth Observation System of
Systems, Environ. Model. Softw., 68, 1–26,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.017, 2015.
OGC: Web Coverage Service, available at:
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wcs (last access:
11 January 2015), 2016.
Rood, R. B. and Edwards, P. N.: Climate Informatics: Human Experts and the
End-to-End System, available at:
http://earthzine.org/2014/05/22/climate-informatics-human-experts-and-the-end-to-end-system/
(last access: 24 June 2015), 2014.
Santos, E., Poco, J., Wei, Y., Liu, S., Cook, B., Williams, D. N., and Silva,
C. T.: UV-CDAT: Analyzing climate datasets from a user's perspective,
Comput. Sci. Eng., 15, 94–103,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2013.15, 2013.
Schmunk, R. B.: Panoply netCDF, HDF and GRIB Data Viewer, available at:
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/panoply/ (last access: 24 June 2015),
2015.
Sun, X., Shen, S., Leptoukh, G. G., Wang, P., Di, L., and Lu, M.:
Development of a Web-based visualization platform for climate research using
Google Earth, Comput. Geosci., 47, 160–168,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.010, 2012.
Tilkov, S. and Vinoski, S.: Node.js: Using JavaScript to build
high-performance network programs, IEEE Internet Computing, 14, 80–83,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2010.145, 2010.
Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy array: A
structure for efficient numerical computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37, 2011.
Williams, D. N., Ananthakrishnan, R., Bernholdt, D. E., Bharathi, S., Brown,
D., Chen, M., Chervenak, A. L., Cinquini, L., Drach, R., Foster, I. T., Fox,
P., Fraser, D., Garcia, J., Hankin, S., Jones, P., Middleton, D. E.,
Schwidder, J., Schweitzer, R., Schuler, R., Shoshani, A., Siebenlist, F.,
Sim, A., Strand, W. G., Su, M., and Wilhelmi, N.: The earth system grid:
Enabling access to multimodel climate simulation data, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 195–205, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2459.1,
2009.
Search articles