Articles | Volume 9, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4097-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4097-2016
Model evaluation paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
17 Nov 2016
Model evaluation paper | Highlight paper |  | 17 Nov 2016

Multi-annual modes in the 20th century temperature variability in reanalyses and CMIP5 models

Heikki Järvinen, Teija Seitola, Johan Silén, and Jouni Räisänen

Related authors

Coupling a weather model directly to GNSS orbit determination – case studies with OpenIFS
Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sebastian Strasser, Lauri Tuppi, Maksym Vasiuta, Markku Poutanen, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2763–2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ensemble prediction using a new dataset of ECMWF initial states – OpenEnsemble 1.0
Pirkka Ollinaho, Glenn D. Carver, Simon T. K. Lang, Lauri Tuppi, Madeleine Ekblom, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2143–2160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Necessary conditions for algorithmic tuning of weather prediction models using OpenIFS as an example
Lauri Tuppi, Pirkka Ollinaho, Madeleine Ekblom, Vladimir Shemyakin, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5799–5812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, 2020
Short summary
Mechanisms and predictability of sudden stratospheric warming in winter 2018
Irina A. Statnaia, Alexey Y. Karpechko, and Heikki J. Järvinen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020
Short summary
Roll vortices induce new particle formation bursts in the planetary boundary layer
Janne Lampilahti, Hanna Elina Manninen, Katri Leino, Riikka Väänänen, Antti Manninen, Stephany Buenrostro Mazon, Tuomo Nieminen, Matti Leskinen, Joonas Enroth, Marja Bister, Sergej Zilitinkevich, Juha Kangasluoma, Heikki Järvinen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Tuukka Petäjä, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11841–11854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on the growth and yield of global staple crops with DSSAT v4.8.0
Jose Rafael Guarin, Jonas Jägermeyr, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Fabio A. A. Oliveira, Senthold Asseng, Kenneth Boote, Joshua Elliott, Lisa Emberson, Ian Foster, Gerrit Hoogenboom, David Kelly, Alex C. Ruane, and Katrina Sharps
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2547–2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, 2024
Short summary
A one-dimensional urban flow model with an eddy-diffusivity mass-flux (EDMF) scheme and refined turbulent transport (MLUCM v3.0)
Jiachen Lu, Negin Nazarian, Melissa Anne Hart, E. Scott Krayenhoff, and Alberto Martilli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2525–2545, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, 2024
Short summary
DCMIP2016: the tropical cyclone test case
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
Stephanie Fiedler, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Christopher J. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Ryan J. Kramer, Toshihiko Takemura, Robert J. Allen, Ulas Im, Matthew Kasoar, Angshuman Modak, Steven Turnock, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Duncan Watson-Parris, Daniel M. Westervelt, Laura J. Wilcox, Alcide Zhao, William J. Collins, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2387–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
CD-type discretization for sea ice dynamics in FESOM version 2
Sergey Danilov, Carolin Mehlmann, Dmitry Sidorenko, and Qiang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2287–2297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Achlioptas, D.: Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 66, 671–687, 2003.
Allen, M. R. and Robertson, A. W.: Distinguishing modulated oscillations from coloured noise in multivariate datasets, Clim. Dynam., 12, 775–784, 1996.
Bellenger, H., Guilyardi, E., Leloup, J., Lengaigne, M., and Vialard, J.: ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5, Clim. Dynam., 42, 1999–2018, 2014.
Bingham, E. and Mannila, H.: Random projection in dimensionality reduction: applications to image and text data, in: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD'01, ACM, New York, 245–250, 2001.
Download
Short summary
This study compares the 20th century multi-annual climate variability modes in reanalysis data sets (ERA-20C and 20CR) and 12 climate model simulations using the randomised multi-channel singular spectrum analysis. The reanalysis data sets are remarkably similar on all timescales, except that the spectral power in ERA-20C is systematically slightly higher than in 20CR. None of the climate models closely reproduce all aspects of the reanalysis spectra, although many aspects are represented well.