Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185-4208, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
22 Nov 2016
High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6
Reindert J. Haarsma et al.
Download
Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
SC1: 'Executive Editor Comment on a CMIP6 model experiment description paper', Astrid Kerkweg, 13 Apr 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC1: 'Response to SC1', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
SC2: 'Volcanic forcing', Klaus Wyser, 18 Apr 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC2: 'Response to SC2', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
SC3: 'GHG forcing', Klaus Wyser, 19 Apr 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC7: 'Response to SC3', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
SC4: 'Experiment names and initial condition', Malcolm J. Roberts, 06 May 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC6: 'Response to SC4', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC1: 'Formal review of manuscript', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 May 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC3: 'Response to anonymous referee #1', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC2: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 May 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC4: 'Response to anonymous referee #2', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC3: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 Jun 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
AC5: 'Response to anonymous referee #3', Reindert Haarsma, 04 Jul 2016 Printer-friendly Version 
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Reindert Haarsma on behalf of the Authors (05 Jul 2016)  Author's response  Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (23 Jul 2016) by Robert Marsh
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (03 Oct 2016)
ED: Publish as is (10 Oct 2016) by Robert Marsh  
CC BY 4.0
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Recent progress in computing power has enabled climate models to simulate more processes in detail and on a smaller scale. Here we present a common protocol for these high-resolution runs that will foster the analysis and understanding of the impact of model resolution on the simulated climate. These runs will also serve as a more reliable source for assessing climate risks that are associated with small-scale weather phenomena such as tropical cyclones.
Recent progress in computing power has enabled climate models to simulate more processes in...
Share